Sports and Numbers

Newsletter

 
LS80 Power Ratings Print E-mail
Feb 9, 2010

Current Power Ratings

Thru games played Mon Feb 8, 2010

(Scroll to bottom of page to see methodology)

 

Team PR Rating       
Team LS80 Rating
Kansas 56.96  Kansas 57.28
Kansas State 54.83  Kansas State 54.46
Baylor 54.01  Baylor 53.89
Missouri 52.16  Texas 51.64
Texas 51.33  Oklahoma State 50.36
Oklahoma State 50.69  Missouri 49.35
Texas A&M 50.62  Texas A&M 48.68
Colorado 48.45  Colorado 48.34
Texas Tech 45.47  Iowa State 47.74
Oklahoma 45.23  Nebraska 47.22
Nebraska 45.10  Oklahoma 46.45
Iowa State 45.09  Texas Tech 44.52
Home Adv (%) 1.59  Home Adv (%) 1.67

 

Prediction Comparison

 

  Pure Ratio LS80
Mean of Differences Squared* 23.95 15.93
Individual Matchup Wins** 18 26
Individual Matchup Win Pct 40.9% 59.1%
*Primary metric for determining superior system.  Lower is better.
**Not the same as predicting winner of the game.  It is which system did a better job of predicting the ratio of final score.

 

 

Upcoming Games

 

Home  Road  PR Home Team % of Pts Scored  LS80 Home Team % of Pts Scored
 Oklahoma  Texas Tech
 50.71  51.80

 

 

Predictions Tracker

(not sorted chronologically - first sorted by home team, then road team)

 

Home Road Home Sc Road Sc Date PR Pred Hm% LS80 Pred Hm% Win PR Diff-sq LS80 Diff-sq
Baylor Iowa State 84 63 2/3/2010 55.89 54.67 PR 1.56 6.10
Baylor Kansas State 74 76 1/26/2010 52.48 53.08 PR 9.91 14.02
Baylor Oklahoma State 83 70 1/16/2010 55.44 53.05 PR 1.42 1.44
Colorado Baylor 78 71 1/12/2010 46.94 47.38 LS80 29.26 24.69
Colorado Kansas 60 60 2/3/2010 46.03 45.35 PR 15.75 21.64
Colorado Kansas State 81 87 1/16/2010 58.99 51.01 LS80 116.12 7.82
Colorado Missouri 66 84 2/6/2010 50.75 51.76 PR 45.53 60.22
Colorado Nebraska 72 60 1/27/2010 54.77 51.63 PR 0.05 8.49
Iowa State Colorado 64 63 1/30/2010 47.73 50.05 LS80 7.10 0.12
Iowa State Kansas 61 84 1/23/2010 44.26 45.21 PR 4.80 9.84
Iowa State Kansas State 75 79 2/6/2010 45.23 47.06 LS80 12.06 2.69
Kansas Baylor 81 75 1/20/2010 47.70 51.90 LS80 17.81 0.00
Kansas Missouri 84 65 1/25/2010 54.36 55.02 LS80 4.06 1.85
Kansas Nebraska 75 64 2/6/2010 57.69 57.15 LS80 13.97 10.22
Kansas Texas Tech 89 63 1/16/2010 55.89 63.05 PR 7.09 20.23
Kansas State Kansas 69 69 1/30/2010 48.82 46.79 PR 1.40 10.34
Kansas State Oklahoma State 69 73 1/23/2010 50.49 49.85 LS80 3.61 1.58
Kansas State Texas 71 62 1/18/2010 54.32 52.71 LS80 0.88 0.45
Kansas State Texas A&M 88 65 1/12/2010 51.30 54.22 LS80 38.64 10.87
Missouri Nebraska 70 53 1/23/2010 53.82 50.23 PR 9.56 44.63
Missouri Oklahoma State 95 80 1/30/2010 48.16 47.87 PR 37.54 41.16
Missouri Texas A&M 74 77 2/3/2010 51.88 51.08 LS80 8.27 4.31
Nebraska Iowa State 53 56 1/16/2010 40.88 51.89 LS80 59.97 10.67
Nebraska Kansas State 57 76 2/2/2010 45.69 48.03 PR 8.01 26.79
Nebraska Oklahoma 63 46 1/30/2010 48.72 51.18 LS80 82.47 43.80
Oklahoma Iowa State 89 84 1/27/2010 51.86 50.03 PR 0.17 2.02
Oklahoma Missouri 66 61 1/16/2010 53.06 51.96 LS80 1.19 0.00
Oklahoma Oklahoma State 54 54 1/11/2010 43.97 46.02 LS80 36.36 15.84
Oklahoma Texas 80 71 2/6/2010 45.96 47.28 LS80 49.32 32.45
Oklahoma State Colorado 90 78 1/20/2010 51.02 52.13 LS80 6.49 2.09
Oklahoma State Texas 60 72 2/1/2010 51.64 50.54 LS80 38.20 25.84
Oklahoma State Texas A&M 76 69 1/27/2010 54.32 53.82 LS80 3.63 1.97
Texas Baylor 64 64 1/30/2010 47.85 48.58 LS80 4.64 2.01
Texas Kansas 68 80 2/8/2010 48.00 48.00 LS80 4.24 4.24
Texas Texas A&M 60 60 1/16/2010 65.50 57.33 LS80 240.25 53.73
Texas Texas Tech 95 83 1/27/2010 53.49 55.61 PR 0.02 5.02
Texas A&M Baylor 78 71 2/6/2010 48.01 47.54 PR 18.80 23.10
Texas A&M Colorado 67 63 1/23/2010 49.05 49.70 LS80 6.20 3.37
Texas A&M Oklahoma 65 62 1/19/2010 53.63 54.91 PR 6.00 13.90
Texas A&M Texas Tech 85 70 1/30/2010 52.49 52.82 LS80 5.52 4.08
Texas Tech Iowa State 78 71 1/20/2010 46.54 44.50 PR 33.72 61.57
Texas Tech Missouri 79 79 1/13/2010 48.09 49.79 LS80 3.65 0.04
Texas Tech Oklahoma 75 65 1/23/2010 47.93 47.20 PR 31.86 40.59
Texas Tech Oklahoma State 81 74 2/6/2010 47.09 47.23 LS80 26.69 25.24

 

Methodology

 

The LS80 methodology employs the concept of knowing when a game is "statistically over."  It is based on a formula devised by Bill James.  If a team with a lead meets the criteria in the formula, that lead is 100% safe.  At Statsheet.com, each game has the "Lead Safe" metric posted in the "Flow" section of the game recap.  Next to that is a number between 0 and 100 to indicate how safe the lead is.

 

The underlying principle of the LS80 Power Ratings is that the difference in strength between two teams is directly correlated to the time left in the game when the lead is 80% safe.  I also believe it is correlated to the point at which it is 100% safe, but so many games are only over at the :01 mark or :05 mark that it doesn't provide enough heterogeneity to establish a clear ranking system.  The ratings will be a best-fit solution for the results of each game, namely the time left in the game when the winner has reached the 80% mark for "Lead Safe" according to Statsheet.com.  Usually there is no specific time point with 80%, so I will do a linear estimation of that point between two given points (i.e., if 1:40 left is lead safe 60% and 1:10 is 100%, then the halfway mark 1:25 is the 80% point I will enter as data).

 

In order to test this hypothesis a bit, I will do a simple experiment for the Big 12 regular season.  I will do a comparison between the LS80 Power Ratings and a traditional "Pure Points" style power rating (e.g. Sagarin Predictor), where the only thing that matters is the final ratio of scores in the game (as opposed to the simple margin - adjusts for the tempo this way).  The metric I will use to do the comparison is the prediction of the RATIO of the scores for each team.  I will use only Big 12 regular season data so that both systems have the same amount of information.  That is one of the reasons I'm not comparing it to KenPom.com or some other system that has several months of data already stored up.

 

Example:  If the LS80 ratings for the two teams after home advantage are 60 and 40, the prediction will be that Team A will score 60% of the points (calculated as Team A's rating divided by the sum of the two ratings).  If the "Pure Ratio" ratings for each team after home advantage are 55 and 50, the prediction will be that Team A will score 52.4% of the points in the game (same calculation method).  ACTUAL RESULT - Team A (78pts) and Team B (55pts).  So, Team A actually scored 54.5% of the points, meaning that the LS80 system was off by 5.5% and "Pure Ratio" was off by 2.1%.

 

"Pure Ratio" won this hypothetical match-up, and that will be tracked.  But for the purposes of the overall winner at the end of the season, I will look at the average of the sum of the squares of each result.  That's what you'll see in the tracker below the ratings.

 

Additional Notes:

  • Overtime games will count as 0:00 time left on clock for purposes of the LS80 ratings, and for Pure Ratio ratings they will count as 50/50.
  • Sometimes, I will not be able to update this page every time games are played.  However, when I "skip ahead" I will always be doing predictions retroactively to the data that would have been available the day a game was played.  You will see these predictions in the predictions tracker listed just as any other prediction would be.

 

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh