| |
| Early editions of previews and recaps are often emailed to newsletter subscribers in advance. If you'd like to receive advance copies, click on "Newsletter" above or enter email on menu to the left to sign up. |
| Historical Player Ratings: Kansas Basketball 2003-04 |
|
|
| Aug 30, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In this series of articles, I'm going to rate the players from KU teams of this decade. I'll try to provide some context for the ratings. A couple of important caveats to this kind of analysis: 1) I'm using season-ending boxscores, which means that the ratings don't account for how well a player performed against specific opponents, and 2) There is really no way of knowing whether a team with a power rating of 90 one season is the same as one rated 90 in another, although from top to bottom in college basketball, there probability isn't huge variability in team strength averages from season to season.
Kansas Jayhawks Men's Basketball 2003-04Overall Record: 24-9
Season Totals(sorted by total minutes played)
Derived Statistics(sorted by points per game)
Player Ratings
Player Analysis
This season ushered in the Bill Self Era with gusto. Although the Jayhawks finished just one overtime period away from a third consecutive Final Four appearance, they lost a January game to Richmond. In Allen Fieldhouse. To be fair, the Elite 8 appearance was helped by a couple of upsets in KU's path. That's not to take away from the credit the team deserves for showing up with the goods each of those tournament games. It just means that it would be unwise to think Kansas was one of the eight best teams that season simply based on its tournament finish. There were plenty of personnel changes, even aside from coaching. The celebrated class of Collison, Gooden and Hinrich was finally gone. This was the first chance for the nucleus of Wayne Simien, Keith Langford and Aaron Miles to strut their stuff as the primary characters. They carried their own, for the most part. The incoming class led by David Padgett, JR Giddens, Omar Wilkes and Jeremy Case was supposed to provide some firepower to supplement the veterans. This was definitely Simien's team. He led the team in total contributions and efficiency, both by overwhelming margins. But Simien's efficiency rating took a significant hit from the prior season. Mind you, it's still in the range of "star player" but not "superstar" like it was the previous season. He averaged nearly 18 PTS, 9 REB on 53.5 eFG% and a team-leading FT rate and very high FT%. What probably dragged Simien's rating down more than anything, compared to the last season, was the overall team performance. Providing roughly the same kind of numbers in the context of somewhat worse team performance can affect a player's efficiency rating significantly. Expectations were sky high for Jeff Graves after his solid performance in the national championship game. But Graves' continued lack of discipline combined with the stress of all the changes in the program kept his performance from impressing too many observers. His efficiency was down about 1.50 from the prior season. Graves did shoot an impressive 62 eFG% and averaged 6 PTS, 5 REB in only 18 MIN/gm. To some, the hi-low offense seemed to operate more smoothly when he was in the game with Simien, although none of the three bigs (Simien, Padgett, Graves) were great passers. The last piece of the three-headed-monster was promising freshman David Padgett. DPad turned in a solid freshman campaign, including his biggest highlight, the game-winning shot at the buzzer against archrival Missouri in the last game at the Hearnes Center. But many labeled Padgett as too soft. After transferring at the end of the season, Padgett indicated that he wanted to play at a school where he could shoot more from the perimeter a la Dirk Nowitzki. For the season, Padgett shot a healthy 53 eFG% while averaging 6.5 PTS, 4.5 REB and 1.4 BLK in only 19 MIN/gm. In the backcourt, there were three solid (not spectacular) seasons put in by the starters. Langford shot 53 eFG% and averaged over 15 PTS, 5 REB, 3.5 AST and 1 STL. He had an all-around balanced game, failing to score in double figures in only four games all season. But Langford's efficiency rating was nearly identical to the prior season's rating. The smooth-stroking Giddens, meanwhile, tore up the nets with nearly 60 eFG% and averaged 11 PTS and 3 REB as a mere freshman. However, he had the lowest FT rate of any player in the regular rotation. Many were frustrated to see Giddens' apparent athletic abilities go to waste by becoming merely a spot-up three-point shooter, but that's what he mostly focused on. Miles had significant improvement from his freshman to sophomore season, but this time his efficiency rating was only marginally increased (about half a point). He bumped up his eFG% by about one percent while averaging 7.3 AST and a 2.7-to-1 AST:TO ratio. Miles' biggest barrier to star-like numbers was his shooting, but he played the role he was meant to play quite well. The only other players with significant minutes were Michael Lee and Jeff Hawkins. Lee had only a fair season while shooting nearly 49 eFG%. Hawkins had the worst season on the team in terms of impact. There just isn't a whole lot to be gained from shooting 35 eFG%, except maybe a starting spot the next season. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |