|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preview: North Carolina at DukeMarch 3, 2006 North Carolina at Duke (Durham, NC)
PSAN-Related Player RatingsExplanation of PSAN-related Ratings
* Played fewer than 8 minutes per game.
|
Duke Ratings
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PLAYER | cPSAN70 | cPSAN |
| Shelden Williams | 9.11 | 223.59 |
| Eric Boateng* | 5.33 | 6.33 |
| Josh McRoberts | 5.01 | 86.86 |
| J.J. Redick | 4.68 | 129.64 |
| Jordan Davidson* | 4.29 | 1.22 |
| Jamal Boykin* | 3.79 | 6.46 |
| Ross Perkins* | 3.74 | 1.16 |
| Patrick Johnson* | 3.01 | 1.71 |
| Sean Dockery | 2.89 | 66.49 |
| DeMarcus Nelson | 2.13 | 19.99 |
| Lee Melchionni | 1.78 | 28.24 |
| Joe Pagliuca* | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Greg Paulus | -0.09 | -2.26 |
| Martynas Pocius* | -0.10 | -0.45 |
*Played fewer than 8 minutes per game.
Rating not based on enough data.
Duke's tremendous success this season leads to lots of "PSAN points" to be spread around. So, naturally the talent on the floor is predicted to be much greater for Duke than for UNC. Shelden Williams and J.J. Redick alone combine for more total contributions (sum of their cPSAN scores) than the entire UNC team. And if that weren't enough, McRoberts actually has a better efficiency rating (cPSAN70) than Redick or any UNC player except Hansbrough.
One thing that strikes me is the lack of depth on both teams. Looking at cPSAN contributions, UNC has only five players in double figures on that measure, and Duke has only six despite all the ratings points they have to go around. Also interesting is that Duke has one starter that has the lowest efficiency rating on the team (Paulus).
Efficiency Analysis |
|
|
North Carolina |
Duke |
|
|
Other Efficiency Notes:
|
|
The last game went down to the wire after it looked as though Duke would run away with it. So, we know that UNC has the ability to play with the Bluedevils. But in Durham, it'll be much tougher for UNC to mount a comeback, especially in light of this being many of their players' first time playing significant minutes in Cameron Indoor. Poise will be key in determining whether UNC makes it close or lets Duke blow them out.
A few things we can be sure of. This game will be played at a fast tempo, probably with above average offensive efficiency. UNC should own the glass. Duke should win the blocking game and force UNC to take lots of outside shots. UNC will likely have more TO's than Duke and take many fewer FT's, meaning they will really have to do well in the other phases of offensive efficiency (shooting, offensive rebounding).
Sports and Numbers Prediction: Duke wins 86-75.
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For |
|||
|
Keys to Watch For |
Metric |
Result |
Edge (Comments) |
| UNC must shoot the ball extremely well, particularly from the outside | UNC to shoot at least 50 eFG% (preferably at least 38% from 3FG) | ||
| UNC must dominate the offensive rebounding game | UNC to grab at least 40% of available offensive rebounds | ||
| Redick doesn't always have the most efficient game, but in the last 5 minutes of the game, he can suddenly dominate and take over. | If the game is in contention during the last 5 minutes, Redick must shoot at least 45 eFG%, or else he could shoot Duke out of the game | ||
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
|
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy