Preview: Illinois at Wisconsin
January 30, 2006
Illinois at Wisconsin (Madison, WI)
| |
Illinois |
Wisconsin |
|
Talent Indicators |
|
|
| Div I Records |
19-2 |
15-5 |
| RPI |
8 |
9 |
| Sagarin Power Ranking |
6 |
25 |
| Pomeroy Power Ranking |
7
Last 5: #11 |
22
Last 5: #102 |
| Best games this season (RPI) |
vs Michigan St (#5) W60-50
vs Michigan (#17) W79-74 |
vs Michigan St (#5) W82-63
vs Iowa (#10) W66-52 |
|
Predictions |
|
|
| Vegas Oddsmakers |
|
Win by 2.5 |
| Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) |
EVEN |
EVEN |
| Pomeroy Ratings |
|
Win by 1 |
Interesting Stats
- Wisconsin games feature much higher 2nd-half scoring than they do 1st-half
scoring (15 more points total in 2nd half)
- Illinois is pitiful at the FT line (62.3%), but Wisconsin is not full of
marksmanship either (65.8%)
- Both teams have excellent AST:TO ratios while holding opponents to
extremely low ratios
- Illinois' opponents take very few 3-pointers, while Wisconsin's opponents
take slightly higher than average number
- On the road, Illinois is an entirely different team, with poor shooting,
rebounding, even worse FT's, AST:TO ratio, and relying even more heavily on
3-pt shooting
- In the last 5 games, 40% of Wisconsin's shots have come from behind the
arc
SANZ and eSANZ Ratings
Do NOT compare player ratings on one team to the ratings on another
team.
See link to "Explanation of my ratings" to the right for
description of what SANZ and eSANZ represent.
Illinois SANZ Ratings
| Position |
Player Name |
SANZ |
Min/G |
Rotation ID |
| Big |
James Augustine |
45.06 |
31.62 |
BALLER |
| Small |
Dee Brown |
24.36 |
34.76 |
BALLER |
| Small |
Jamar Smith |
14.20 |
19.14 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Warren Carter |
8.48 |
12.50 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Brian Randle |
5.72 |
25.60 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Shaun Pruitt |
4.60 |
20.00 |
BALLER |
| Small |
Rich McBride |
1.05 |
28.81 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Marcus Arnold |
-14.62 |
13.20 |
Misfiring |
| Small |
Chester Frazier |
-15.93 |
15.33 |
ROLE |
| Combo |
Calvin Brock |
-16.28 |
8.00 |
Misfiring |
Wisconsin SANZ Ratings
| Position |
Player Name |
SANZ |
Min/G |
Rotation ID |
| Big |
Brian Butch |
30.54 |
24.25 |
BALLER |
| Small |
Kammron Taylor |
23.04 |
34.30 |
BALLER |
| Small |
Michael Flowers |
13.16 |
24.30 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Greg Stiemsma |
11.70 |
11.69 |
BALLER |
| Combo |
DeAaron Williams |
3.48 |
7.88 |
BALLER |
| Combo |
Alando Tucker |
2.75 |
33.00 |
BALLER |
| Combo |
Marcus Landry |
0.12 |
15.38 |
BALLER |
| Big |
Jason Chappell |
-0.12 |
21.40 |
BALLER |
| Combo |
Ray Nixon |
-1.31 |
21.35 |
BALLER |
| Combo |
Joe Krabbenhoft |
-13.16 |
14.80 |
Misfiring |
| Combo |
Kevin Gullikson |
-13.87 |
3.90 |
Benchwarmer |
| Small |
Tanner Bronson |
-26.03 |
2.08 |
Benchwarmer |
Player Analysis:
(largely based on ratings above)
Although Taylor has contributed the most to the boxscore given his minutes,
it's Butch that has played more efficiently according to this rating
system. As a big, Butch excels in what he should, 2FG, rebounding, and
blocks. Meanwhile, he doesn't hurt the team with too many turnovers or
fouls. Taylor has helped the team the most from the freethrow line and
three-point line, but he's a team-worst in the 2FG rating category (these are
not necessarily correlated exactly with shooting percentage ... they take into
account how often a player shoots also). He also has a team-worst TO
rating.
Where does all this leave leading scorer Tucker? Well, he sure scores a
lot of points, but he does it terribly inefficiently. He is killing the
team from the freethrow line and 3-point line. He turns it over too often
and doesn't contribute much to any other category. He must be doing
something since the coach plays him 33 minutes a game. But his stats
reflect some inefficiencies there. Krabbenhoft has the worst combination
of rating combined with playing time (i.e., he's hurt the team the most this
season).
On Illinois' side, this is Augustine and Brown's team. Dee gets all the
attention, but it's really Augustine who's contributing the most. But
don't overlook Smith. He's scoring 9 points per game in only 19 minutes
per game, and he's even shooting well above 50% from behind the arc. But
this is definitely Augustine and Brown's team. They need to step up to
make sure Illinois can win on the road.
Efficiency Analysis
|
|
Illinois |
Wisconsin |
- Illinois plays at an extremely slow tempo (#242) with tremendous offense
(#29) and defense (3).
- They excel in nearly all aspects of the offense except the use of the FT
line as a weapon (#299)
- On defense, they are elite at defensive eFG% (#7) and limiting offensive
rebounds (#9)
- Illinois owns the three-point line, shooting strong (#63) and really
clamping down on opponents (#3)
- Illinois is one of the worst FT shooting teams in the country
- Illinois allows way too many blocks and only blocks a below-average number
- Illinois scores a disproportionately high percentage of its points from
the 3-pt line while scoring a very low percentage from the FT line
- Its opponents score a lot of 2-pt field goals and very few from 3-point
land
|
- Wisconsin plays at an average tempo (#131) with a very strong offense
(#35) and tremendous defense (#19)
- The biggest driver of Wisconsin's offensive efficiency is their ability to
hold onto the ball (#12), while they are only average at shooting and using
the FT line as a weapon
- On defense, their biggest weakness is not forcing their opponents into
enough turnovers, but this is not as big a deal for them because they take
such great care of the ball
- Wisconsin has a balanced offensive point distribution, while its opponents
score more 3-pointers and fewer FT's
|
| Other Efficiency Notes:
|
Game Outlook
This game could boil down to the Illini's 3-point shooting, since they score
a lot of them and Wisconsin's opponents seem to score more selectively from
there. What does that mean? Mr. Brown, McBride, and Smith must have
big games. For Wisconsin, they must make sure to watch those Illini
perimeter players. And when Illinois misses from deep, Wisconsin must do a
good job of getting defensive rebounds. Wisconsin doesn't usually beat
itself based on these numbers, so if they can make sure to do the little things
and hope Illinois doesn't get hot from the perimeter, it is probably their game
to lose.
My personal prediction: Wisconsin wins 66-62.
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For
|
|
Keys to Watch For
|
Metric
|
Result
|
Edge (Comments)
|
| Illinois must capitalize on its 3-point shooting prowess |
Illinois to make at least 10 three-pointers |
|
|
| Because Illinois will be jacking up 3's, Wisconsin must be
able to get the defensive rebounds, or it will be a long day for them |
Wisconsin to rebound at least 2/3 of available defensive
rebounds |
|
|
| Wisconsin needs to win the turnover game, since Illinois can
score in spurts, but Wisconsin has a more balanced offense relying on ball
control |
Wisconsin to have at least 4 fewer turnovers than Illinois |
|
|
|