2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

Explanation of Terms

NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.

(5) Washington vs. (12) Utah State

Clear Advantage for Washington	No Clear Advantage	Clear Advantage for Utah State
Washington Strength - Utah State OREB
Washington TO rate
Washington Strength - Washington OREB
Utah State FT Rate
Washington Strength - Washington Points Per Possession
	Utah State TO rate
	Washington 3pt FG%
	Washington FT%
	Washington 2pt FG%
	Washington eFG%
	Utah State % Poss Blocked by Opp
	Washington % Poss Blocked by Opp
	Utah State Points Per Possession
	Utah State 3pt FG%
		Utah State Strength - Utah State eFG%
		Utah State Strength - Utah State 2pt FG%
		Utah State Strength - Washington FT Rate
		Utah State FT%

Other Notes: (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)

Washington will take below avg # of 3FG's
Utah State will take above avg # of 3FG's
Utah State will have below avg # of FG's assisted
Washington plays faster tempo than Utah State

Back to Main Bracket

Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

2006 NCAA Tournament Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

(5) Washington vs. (12) Utah State

Back to Main Bracket

Email this page to your friend

2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis