Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

 

2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

Explanation of Terms

NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.

(1) Connecticut vs. (16) Albany

Clear Advantage for Connecticut No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Albany
Connecticut Strength - Albany % Poss Blocked by Opp    
Connecticut Strength - Connecticut Points Per Possession    
Connecticut Strength - Albany 2pt FG%    
Connecticut Strength - Connecticut FT Rate    
Connecticut Strength - Albany Points Per Possession    
  Connecticut TO rate  
Connecticut Strength - Connecticut OREB    
  Albany eFG%  
  Albany OREB  
  Albany 3pt FG%  
  Albany FT Rate  
  Connecticut 2pt FG%  
  Connecticut eFG%  
  Connecticut % Poss Blocked by Opp  
  Connecticut FT%  
  Connecticut 3pt FG%  
  Albany FT%  
    Albany TO rate

Other Notes:  (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)

  • Connecticut will take below avg # of 3FG's
  • Albany will take above avg # of 3FG's
  • Albany will have above avg % of FG's assisted
  • Connecticut plays faster tempo than Albany

Back to Main Bracket

 



Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy