Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

 

2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

Explanation of Terms

NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.

(2) Tennessee vs. (15) Winthrop

Clear Advantage for Tennessee No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Winthrop
Tennessee FT%    
Tennessee Strength - Winthrop FT%    
Tennessee Strength - Winthrop TO rate    
  Winthrop Points Per Possession  
  Tennessee Points Per Possession  
  Tennessee 3pt FG%  
  Tennessee eFG%  
  Tennessee TO rate  
  Tennessee 2pt FG%  
  Winthrop FT Rate  
  Winthrop % Poss Blocked by Opp  
  Tennessee FT Rate  
    Winthrop 3pt FG%
    Winthrop Strength - Winthrop OREB
    Tennessee % Poss Blocked by Opp
    Winthrop 2pt FG%
    Winthrop Strength - Tennessee OREB
    Winthrop eFG%

Other Notes:  (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)

  • Winthrop will take above avg # of 3FG's
  • Winthrop will have below avg # of FG's assisted
  • Tennessee plays faster tempo than Winthrop

Back to Main Bracket

 



Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy