Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

 

2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

Explanation of Terms

NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.

(5) Syracuse vs. (12) Texas A&M

Clear Advantage for Syracuse No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Texas A&M
Syracuse Strength - Texas A&M % Poss Blocked by Opp    
Syracuse Strength - Syracuse OREB    
Syracuse Strength - Texas A&M 2pt FG%    
  Texas A&M FT%  
  Texas A&M eFG%  
  Syracuse FT Rate  
  Texas A&M OREB  
  Syracuse % Poss Blocked by Opp  
  Texas A&M Points Per Possession  
  Texas A&M TO rate  
  Syracuse 3pt FG%  
  Texas A&M 3pt FG%  
  Syracuse FT%  
  Syracuse Points Per Possession  
  Syracuse eFG%  
    Texas A&M Strength - Syracuse 2pt FG%
    Texas A&M Strength - Texas A&M FT Rate
    Texas A&M Strength - Syracuse TO rate

Other Notes:  (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)

  • Syracuse will take above avg # of 3FG's
  • Texas A&M will have below avg # of FG's assisted
  • Syracuse plays faster tempo than Texas A&M

Back to Main Bracket

 



Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy