|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preview: Villanova vs FloridaMarch 25, 2006 Villanova (1) vs Florida (3) - NCAA Tournament 2006
PSAN-Related Player Ratings
* Played fewer than 20% of possessions.
|
Florida Ratings
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PLAYER | cPSAN70 | cPSAN |
| Joakim Noah | 8.70 | 185.16 |
| Al Horford | 6.25 | 140.31 |
| Garrett Tyler* | 4.43 | 4.30 |
| Chris Richard | 3.73 | 57.37 |
| Lee Humphrey | 3.07 | 76.63 |
| Corey Brewer | 3.04 | 74.20 |
| Taurean Green | 1.83 | 53.06 |
| David Huertas | 1.47 | 10.91 |
| Adrian Moss | 1.15 | 11.74 |
| Brett Swanson* | 0.38 | 0.42 |
| Walter Hodge | -0.39 | -6.78 |
| Jack Berry* | -0.94 | -0.71 |
* Played fewer than 20% of possessions.
Rating not based on enough data.
Florida boasts the two strongest players on the floor, in terms of this player ratings system anyway. Noah and Horford both have impressive efficiency (cPSAN70) ratings and "total impact" (cPSAN) ratings. They're not only playing extremely well, they are playing lots of minutes to contribute to the game. Richard, Humphrey, and Brewer round out the rest of the players who are reasonably efficient and play minutes.
Nova has a much more balanced attack, with Lowry and Foye leading the way. Foye's had a greater overall impact due to playing time, but Lowry has been slightly more efficient according to this model. Ray is the only other player with a +3.00 or better efficiency rating. The difference here is that Nova has lots of players in the +2.00 to +3.00 range, all of whom play significant minutes (Sheridan, Fraser, Cunningham).
The talent is top-heavy on Florida, while Nova is more balanced. But on the whole, it looks a bit like Florida has the better individual players by a slight nod in this ratings model.
Keep in mind, individual defense is almost always undervalued in this ratings system, because it is derived solely from boxscore statistics.
Efficiency Analysis |
|
|
Villanova |
Florida |
|
|
Other Efficiency Notes:
|
|
| Clear Advantage for Villanova | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Florida |
| Florida TO rate | ||
| Villanova TO rate | ||
| Villanova 3pt FG% | ||
| Florida OREB | ||
| Florida % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Villanova OREB | ||
| Villanova FT% | ||
| Florida FT% | ||
| Villanova Points Per Possession | ||
| Florida Points Per Possession | ||
| Villanova FT Rate | ||
| Florida eFG% | ||
| Florida 2pt FG% | ||
| Florida Strength - Villanova eFG% | ||
| Florida Strength - Florida 3pt FG% | ||
| Florida Strength - Florida FT Rate | ||
| Florida Strength - Villanova 2pt FG% | ||
| Florida Strength - Villanova % Poss Blocked by Opp |
A few things we should expect:
Florida is playing unbelievably well right now. Noah and Horford are a formidable duo, but then Nova can play with anybody. The matchups (efficiency analysis) seem to favor Florida a bit. That, combined with the slight edge in player talent, make Florida the likely favorite based on this analysis.
In a game where both sides shoot lots of 3FG's, whether those fall becomes a huge factor. So, nothing is certain here.
Sports and Numbers Prediction: Florida wins 72-71.
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For |
|||
|
Keys to Watch For |
Metric |
Result |
Edge (Comments) |
| 3-pt shootout can swing results either way | Either team with a 10% advantage in 3-pt percentage | ||
| Nova's best chance may be to win the TO game | UF to commit at least 40% more TO's than NOVA | ||
| Nova must contain the strong inside attack of Noah and Horford | Noah and Horford to combine for no more than 25 points and 15 rebounds. | ||
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
|
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy