Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

 

Preview: UCLA vs Florida

April 3, 2006

UCLA (2) vs Florida (3) - NCAA Tournament 2006

  UCLA Florida

Talent Indicators

   
Records 32-6 32-6
Sagarin Power Ranking 6 2
Pomeroy Power Ranking 5
Last 5: #3
1
Last 5: #1

Predictions

   
Vegas Oddsmakers   Win by 1
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor)   Win by 2.5
Pomeroy Ratings   Win by 2.5

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings

Explanation of Ratings

UCLA Ratings
cPSAN (totals)
cPSAN70 (per 70 possessions)

PLAYER cPSAN70 cPSAN
Nican Robinson* 7.32 0.33
Luc Richard Mbah a Moute 6.53 162.67
Lorenzo Mata 5.36 33.88
Ryan Hollins 4.52 68.87
Arron Afflalo 4.47 126.40
Michael Fey* 3.35 8.51
Cedric Bozeman 3.34 61.39
Janou Rubin* 3.17 4.52
Alfred Aboya 3.01 30.12
Jordan Farmar 2.34 56.72
Darren Collison 1.31 21.16
Michael Roll 1.27 15.50
Ryan Wright 0.52 3.50
DeAndre Robinson* -3.40 -0.91
Kelvin Kim* -7.32 -1.47

* Played fewer than 20% of possessions.
Rating not based on enough data.

 

Florida Ratings
cPSAN (totals)
cPSAN70 (per 70 possessions)

PLAYER cPSAN70 cPSAN
Joakim Noah 9.00 203.73
Al Horford 6.54 155.52
Garrett Tyler* 4.51 4.34
Chris Richard 4.10 66.11
Corey Brewer 3.38 86.22
Lee Humphrey 3.31 87.78
Taurean Green 2.30 70.23
David Huertas 1.66 12.94
Adrian Moss 1.41 14.50
Brett Swanson* 0.42 0.47
Walter Hodge -0.20 -3.48
Jack Berry* -0.91 -0.68

* Played fewer than 20% of possessions.
Rating not based on enough data.


Player Analysis:
(largely based on ratings above)

Obviously, with two loaded teams playing their best ball, there is no shortage of talent in this game.  There are excellent performers on both sides, although Florida's Noah stands head-and-shoulders above the rest in terms of overall season contributions and efficiency at doing so (cPSAN70).

Noah and Horford form possibly the most powerful duo in the country.  Both have performed more efficiently than any UCLA player, despite the Bruins' most impressive credentials of Mbah a Moute and Mata.

The edge to overall player talent here goes to Florida by a slight margin.  Whereas the Gators' talent is concentrated very heavily in Noah and Horford, with five players rated +3.00 or better in cPSAN70, the Bruins sport six players rated above +3.00.  Give the quality depth advantage to UCLA by a slight margin.

Both teams sport lower-rated players who have the ability to really change the flow of the game.  UCLA's Farmar uses up an unusually high percentage of his team's possessions, so whether he does that in a good or bad way is key to their performance.  For Florida, Green is also a playmaker with the ability to shoot 3FG's (39%).  On the balance, his contributions have not added up as well as his teammates, but he has the ability to really change the game.  Brewer is also another sharpshooter for the Gators, but his overall rating puts him on solid ground.  His shooting can take the game over, too.  Just ask George Mason.

Efficiency Analysis

UCLA

Florida

  • UCLA plays at a snail's pace (#306), with an excellent offense (#24) and suffocating defense (#3)
  • UCLA's strong offense is keyed by its outstanding shooting (#24) and excellent offensive rebounding (#49), but is slowed by a propensity to turn the ball over (#229)
  • On defense, UCLA has no weaknesses, with its strongest aspect being opponents' eFG% (#34) and "weakest" being the ability to force TO's (#88)
  • Farmar ranks #41 in the nation in % of team possessions used.  This means that Farmar is making most of the plays that result in the end of a possession (good or bad)
  • Mbah a Moute ranks #46 in % of OREB's grabbed, and #62 for DREB
  • UF plays at a slightly above-average pace and is one only two teams in the country (Texas) with a Top 10 offense (#6) and defense (#8)
  • UF's excellent offense is keyed by its strong eFG% (#3) and tremendous ability to use the FT line (#20)
  • Similarly, on defense, UF's strengths are at holding opponents' shooting down (#17) and keeping them off the freethrow line (#43), but they are also decent at forcing TO's (#87) and preventing OREB (#101)
  • UF does an excellent job at the blocking game, ranking #17 at blocking opponents and #52 at avoiding blocks
  • Humphrey ranks #8 in eFG%
  • Horford ranks #40 in eFG%, #52 in % of DREB's grabbed, and #89 in BLK rate
  • Noah ranks #23 in eFG%, #72 in % of DREB's grabbed, #56 in FT rate, #26 in BLK rate
  • Brewer ranks #78 in STL rate

 

Other Efficiency Notes:
  • On offense, UCLA is fairly balanced in where it gets its points, while its opponents rely heavily on 2FG's.
  • On offense, UF relies a bit less than average on 2FG's, while its opponents rarely use FT's and score more from 2FG's than from 3FG's..

Efficiency Strengths and Weaknesses Translated Into Advantages

Explanation of Terms

Clear Advantage for UCLA No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Florida
  Florida TO rate  
UCLA Strength - UCLA OREB    
  Florida OREB  
  UCLA 2pt FG%  
  Florida Points Per Possession  
  UCLA eFG%  
  UCLA Points Per Possession  
  Florida eFG%  
  Florida 2pt FG%  
  UCLA FT Rate  
  Florida FT Rate  
  Florida 3pt FG%  
  UCLA % Poss Blocked by Opp  
  Florida % Poss Blocked by Opp  
    Florida Strength - UCLA 3pt FG%
    Florida Strength - UCLA FT%
    UCLA TO rate
    Florida Strength - Florida FT%
  • Florida will take below avg % of 3FG's
  • Florida will have below avg % of FG's assisted
  • Florida plays faster tempo than UCLA

Game Outlook

A few things we should expect:

  • Both teams may commit lots of TO's, but UCLA will most likely commit more
  • UF will make better use of the freethrow line
  • UCLA may struggle shooting 3FG's
  • UCLA should have a slight advantage on the boards
  • UF may have an advantage in blocks

Factors that contribute to efficiency (points per possession) mostly seem to tip in Florida's favor.  The fact that UCLA will likely commit more TO's, use the FT line less effectively, and struggle shooting from the perimeter will all make it difficult for the Bruins to keep pace with Florida.  The saving grace for UCLA may be its ability to rebound more effectively and keep their possessions alive (though this is not a clear advantage for them).  And even though UCLA may struggle from the perimeter, it's not as clear a trend as the others.  The burden will be on Farmar, Afflalo, and company to have a big perimeter shooting night.

The other issue that will be key is which team's "X factor" player has a bigger game ... UCLA's Farmar or Florida's Green?  Both players had good games in the semifinals.  But Florida's offense will flow through its inside players and won't concentrate on the 3FG unless it falls behind.  Farmar is more likely to have a big game there.

There is no clear-cut choice, however.  And ultimately, the biggest determining factor in a game between two heavyweights is simply who brings their best game to the table.  If both decide to bring their "A" games, we should see Florida prevail in a close one.

Sports and Numbers Prediction: Florida wins 65-61.

Pre-Game Keys to Watch For

Keys to Watch For

Metric

Result

Edge (Comments)

UCLA must make its outside shots on a somewhat consistent basis UCLA to shoot at least 35% on 3FG's    
If either team's "X factor" has a significantly bigger game than his counterpart, it could be swing the game Farmar (UCLA) vs Green (UF) - Either to score at least 8 more points than the other    
A significant rebounding edge for either team could be the difference needed in efficiency Either team to grab at least 55% of all rebounds    


Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy