| Home |
| Kansas Basketball |
| NCAA Basketball |
| Basketball Conference Simulations |
| Basketball Player Ratings Explanation |
| Radio Appearances |
| Newsletter |
| Links |
| Contact |
2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis
NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.
(5) Pittsburgh vs. (12) Kent State
| Clear Advantage for Pittsburgh | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Kent State |
| Pittsburgh FT Rate | ||
| Pittsburgh Strength - Kent State OREB | ||
| Pittsburgh FT% | ||
| Pittsburgh 2pt FG% | ||
| Pittsburgh Strength - Kent State 2pt FG% | ||
| Kent State Points Per Possession | ||
| Pittsburgh Strength - Kent State eFG% | ||
| Pittsburgh Points Per Possession | ||
| Pittsburgh eFG% | ||
| Kent State % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Kent State FT% | ||
| Pittsburgh % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Kent State 3pt FG% | ||
| Kent State FT Rate | ||
| Pittsburgh OREB | ||
| Pittsburgh 3pt FG% | ||
| Kent State Strength - Pittsburgh TO rate | ||
| Kent State TO rate |
Other Notes: (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)
- Pittsburgh will take below avg # of 3FG's
- Pittsburgh will have above avg % of FG's assisted
- Expect average-paced game
Back to Main Bracket
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
Email this page to your friend
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy