| Home |
| Kansas Basketball |
| NCAA Basketball |
| Basketball Conference Simulations |
| Basketball Player Ratings Explanation |
| Radio Appearances |
| Newsletter |
| Links |
| Contact |
2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis
NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.
(7) Marquette vs. (10) Alabama
| Clear Advantage for Marquette | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Alabama |
| Marquette Strength - Marquette 3pt FG% | ||
| Marquette TO rate | ||
| Alabama % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Alabama 3pt FG% | ||
| Marquette Strength - Marquette FT% | ||
| Marquette eFG% | ||
| Marquette Points Per Possession | ||
| Alabama eFG% | ||
| Alabama 2pt FG% | ||
| Alabama Points Per Possession | ||
| Alabama FT% | ||
| Marquette OREB | ||
| Alabama FT Rate | ||
| Marquette 2pt FG% | ||
| Alabama TO rate | ||
| Alabama Strength - Alabama OREB | ||
| Alabama Strength - Marquette % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Alabama Strength - Marquette FT Rate |
Other Notes: (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)
- Marquette will have above avg % of FG's assisted
- Alabama will take below avg # of 3FG's
- Alabama will have below avg # of FG's assisted
- Marquette plays faster tempo than Alabama
Back to Main Bracket
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
Email this page to your friend
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy