| Home |
| Kansas Basketball |
| NCAA Basketball |
| Basketball Conference Simulations |
| Basketball Player Ratings Explanation |
| Radio Appearances |
| Newsletter |
| Links |
| Contact |
2006 NCAA Tournament
Game-by-game Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis
NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left, and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.
(8) Kentucky vs. (16) University of Alabama-Birmingham (UAB)
| Clear Advantage for Kentucky | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for UAB |
| Kentucky OREB | ||
| UAB FT% | ||
| UAB 3pt FG% | ||
| Kentucky 3pt FG% | ||
| UAB OREB | ||
| UAB FT Rate | ||
| Kentucky Points Per Possession | ||
| Kentucky eFG% | ||
| UAB Points Per Possession | ||
| Kentucky 2pt FG% | ||
| UAB eFG% | ||
| UAB % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| UAB 2pt FG% | ||
| Kentucky TO rate | ||
| Kentucky % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Kentucky FT% | ||
| Kentucky FT Rate | ||
| UAB Strength - UAB TO rate |
Other Notes: (Technical glitch in the way "% of FG's assisted trends were calculated ... disregard that particular statistic for any team you read - but 3FG's and tempo calculations are correct)
- UAB will have above avg % of FG's assisted
- UAB plays faster tempo than Kentucky
Back to Main Bracket
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
Email this page to your friend
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy