Kansas College Basketball Season Preview
2006-07
|
C.J. Giles
#33 - Junior
Center
6'10" - 235 lbs
|
Overall ePSAN70
for 2005-06 Season ==> +3.26
(adjusts for quality of opponent, playing
time, and weights recent games most)
|
2005-06 Season Per Game
Averages
|
|
Games |
MIN |
PTS |
REB |
AST |
TO |
STL |
BLK |
PF |
FG% |
FT% |
3FG% |
|
33 |
16.9 |
6.2 |
4.8 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
2.6 |
50.6 |
58.8 |
-- |
2005-06 Season ePSAN70
Component Ratings
Per
70 possessions, contribution from each "tangible" stat
category using exclusive
PSAN
calculations
Along with the "intangibles" makes up the ePSAN70
overall rating
|
|
2FG |
3FG |
FT |
AST |
REB |
STL |
TO |
BLK |
PF |
|
0.72 |
0 |
0.17 |
0.29 |
4.6 |
0.66 |
-1.62 |
1.46 |
-1.73 |
|
|
Game Impact (cPSAN)
2005-06 Season Trends
|
Improvement Index
-
+0.07
(Game-to-Game)
-
+0.09
(3-gm
Moving Avg)
|
Range is -1 to +1. Shows correlation between
cPSAN game rating and the game # (i.e., how deep into
season). Index of +1 indicates perfectly steady
improvement, and -1 indicates perfectly steady
worsening. "Game-to-Game" does this using each game #
and the corresponding player performance.
"3-gm Moving Avg" does this using each game # and the
average player performance over the 3 most recent games.
This helps iron out game-to-game variations in case they
are masking a true overall trend. |
Consistency Index
-0.23
|
Range is -1 to +1. Shows correlation between
cPSAN game rating and the cPSAN rating for the previous
game. Basically measures game-to-game consistency.
Positive index means that a good game is usually
followed up by another good game. A negative score
means the player usually performs poorly after a good
game and vice versa. |
Game-by-Game Ratings
This is a chart showing the impact the player made on each
game last season, using the cPSAN score. The cPSAN does
adjust for the quality of the opponent, but unlike the cPSAN70,
does not adjust for playing time. The rationale for using
this rating is that I wanted to measure the player's impact each
individual game as the season progresses, not just how well he
uses the time he's on court. For my overall season ratings
(ePSAN70), I like to adjust for playing time so we're comparing
fairly. So, don't be confused if a player's ratings on the
chart below don't match his ePSAN70 rating above ... one adjusts
for playing time, and the other doesn't.

|
|
Gm# |
Opponent |
|
1 |
Idaho St. |
|
2 |
Arizona |
|
3 |
Arkansas |
|
4 |
Nevada |
|
5 |
W. Illinois |
|
6 |
St. Joe's |
|
7 |
California |
|
8 |
Pepperdine |
|
9 |
N. Colorado |
|
10 |
New Orleans |
|
11 |
Yale |
|
12 |
Kentucky |
|
13 |
at Colorado |
|
14 |
Kansas St |
|
15 |
at Missouri |
|
16 |
Nebraska |
|
17 |
at Texas A&M |
|
18 |
at Iowa St |
|
19 |
Texas Tech |
|
20 |
Oklahoma |
|
21 |
at Nebraska |
|
22 |
Iowa State |
|
23 |
at Okla State |
|
24 |
Missouri |
|
25 |
Baylor |
|
26 |
at Texas |
|
27 |
Colorado |
|
28 |
at Kansas St. |
|
29 |
Okla St. |
|
30 |
Nebraska |
|
31 |
Texas |
|
32 |
Bradley |
|
Analysis
Midway through his freshman campaign, Giles was pegged as the starter
of choice ... and promptly got injured. It's been a struggle ever
since to live up to expectations. Last season, C.J. had moments of
glory (shutting down Leon Powe against Cal), but down the stretch, his
impact on games was rather limited. Fortunately, he stopped having
"bad" games, but he never really broke out much (with the exception
of Baylor and Colorado home games). Continued foul troubles plagued
his court time. But there is no question he can shake things up on
defense with his blocks and occasional strong rebounding games.
He hasn't yet found his consistency, and that may be what stands between
him and a future in the pros.
Giles was the #54-rated offensive rebounder in the country, #315 in
defensive rebounds, and an impressive #34 in blocks per possession.
Giles had a consistency index of -0.23, meaning that he generally
followed up good games with not-so-good ones and vice versa. If
the diagram above looks anything like your EKG when watching him play,
you know what I mean. No wonder, as consistency requires a state
of mental focus that Giles has yet to show for longer than a game.
(Has anyone forgotten that he once put the ball into his own basket on a missed freethrow?) As for improvement, that wasn't terribly evident last
season either.
All in all, last season would probably best be characterized as
slightly better than his freshman season but with the jury still out on
his legacy at Kansas.
What KU Fans Say
Comments from
KUSports.com Message Board:
- I think we're better off with more
consistency from him, not necessarily a higher level of performance.
So, if he gives us 20 minutes of consistent POSITIVE effort versus
10 "great" and 10 "erratic" minutes we'll be nearly impossible to
stop.
- Damnit this guy has the body to do some
damage. Lots of times I just think he doesn't have his head in the
game. Doesn't walk around with any swagger or confidence, always
looks dumbounded. Swats at a lot of shots and that results in fouls
when he could just put his arms straight up. If he hits a similar
learning curve like he did last year then he'll be good, but bottom
line for me, he needs to get his head right. If he doesn't look for
mr. arthur to have a lot of time to show his stuff.
- this kid has major potential but isn't
showing any of it...one major reason is a major lack of motivation
- He has great potential. Most likely not NBA
potential, but if he puts on some more weight and has a little luck
where he scores 20 in a couple of the early games, you never know.
I'm 100% sure that it's all a confidence issue with him. He's
gun-shy. It's easy to see. This is probably one of those guys who
needs more praise than criticism (even if he's needing to be
criticized) until he gets some sort of swagger to his psyche and
game.
Comments from Phog.net
Message Board:
- CJ is a really productive player when not in foul trouble.
- I'll amend that to "productive", and not really productive. His
inconsistency is annoying for sure. Still, I think he could explode
if he put his mind to it...
- Looking at the chart seems that there was a significant gap
between his performances at home and those on the road. (NOTE:
Further analysis showed this to be true -- will be discussed in
future on this site)
- I like the kid, but from my interactions with him, the next time
he puts his mind to something may be the first.
- I think at the end of the year CJ was finally learning to play
"in the system" and that's why we saw him level off a bit. I think
as he continues to learn how to play within the game we can expect
more out of him.
- I think this year is the make it or break it year for C.J. If he
is unable to focus and play consistently this year I doubt that he
does as a senior. I really believe that his raw athletic
ability has been somewhat of a curse for him. He has never seemed to
put as much into gaining good position both offensively or
defensively like Sasha does.
- When it comes down to it, he really hasn't played very well in 2
years except for just a few games. Giles at this point is very
limited in his ability to help the team. He has potential but
somewhere between the bench and the court he loses all his ability.
- KU fans have built CJ up as if he's supposed to be a first round
talent. His RSCI when he graduated HS was only 69 though -- 1 behind
DJ and 2 behind Galindo. CJ was never supposed to be a lottery pick
(or even a draft pick as that only averages out to the top 60/less
after international guys are added in). He was supposed to be a
college big man.
- I think the reason we expect more from CJ is that we've seen
flashes of what he's capable of doing when things are going right
for him. Last season's Cal game is a good example. He's
a tall, long athlete who can run, has decent hands a soft shot. He's
not fundamentally solid, doesn't handle the ball very well and
leaves his feet too early on defense, but he has the raw tools to be
an NBA player. He's a poor man's Marcus Camby, but his chances of
actually being Camby are only about 30-40% at this point due to his
lack of focus and commitment to improvement. And it's not just KU
fans who see this- NBA draft people have their eyes on CJ. If he
puts it together, he'll play professionally. But he could also lose
his spot in the rotation to Arthur and be a total non-factor.
Outlook for 2006-07 Season
Look for upcoming features to discuss this player's potential role on
the team this season.
|