|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recap: Kansas at MissouriFebruary 12, 2007 Kansas 92 - Missouri 74
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My ObservationsThis was nothing like the game I had expected. It was almost exactly what I had expected would happen in the first meeting in Lawrence, with KU scoring at will and rebounding well on the offensive end. Bill Self must have learned more from that first game than Mike Anderson did. For one, Kaun didn't get much playing time, which is not a reflection of his overall abilities but rather an adaptation to the speed of the game against Missouri. That much ballyhooed depth is more than just an elixir for tired starters. It lets the coach mix and match to present the most favorable arsenal of weapons on the floor against whatever the opposition throws against him. More games like this for KU, please. And save a couple for March. Four Factor Analysis
CONCLUSION - This was mostly about shooting, both from the field and the line. The MU crowd was booing all day, but KU took only 4 more FT's. KU broke the press and got better looks and drained them better all day long. Still, MU didn't shoot terribly (48 eFG%). No advantages in this game for MU. Player Performance AnalysisWhat a game for Julian Wright. Or was it Brendan Wright? Come on, announcers, he's not exactly a walk-on for an unknown team! I can't remember the last time any Jayhawk took 21 shots in a game, let alone make 14 of them. Add 12 rebounds (8 offensive), 5-7 from FT, 2 BLK, 2 AST, 1 STL for 33 points ... geez, we can forgive the 4 TO's this time. It's becoming clear that Wright's best games are those where he rebounds aggressively and gets open from about 12 feet or closer. Regardless, when he has his mind in the game and gets his hands on the ball, good things usually happen. The argument for him being the most efficient and biggest contributor to this team grows even more after this game. How about Darnell Jackson? I haven't heard much about his back, so I'm going to assume it's not bothering him too much. How could it, with some of the numbers he's been posting lately? He didn't miss any of his four field goals or two freethrows against MU. He had 6 REB (4 OR), 2 STL and 1 BLK in just 20 minutes. In conference play, he's been our most efficient player, and I'm not sure he'll be losing that spot after this game. Remember, Julian got his stats in 36 minutes. The other major star of this game was Brandon Rush. So nice to see him consistently near the top of my ratings finally. Our leading scorer is beginning to shine all-around again. Can you believe he shot 95 eFG%? That's just sick, considering he didn't take only short jumpers or anything. He took 3 three-pointers (and made all of them). He also chipped in 7 REB and 1 BLK, but also committed 3 TO's. As with Wright, I think we can forgive the turnovers, as he was a beast this day. His defense probably played a role in stopping MU shooters from getting hot from the perimeter. We may be seeing Rush getting better this season, unlike his late-season fade last year. That can only mean good things as we head into March. The only other KU player with solid stats was Sherron Collins. No surprise there, as Collins has been something of a wonderboy over the last several weeks. In 27 minutes, he missed both of his 3FG's and yet managed to shoot 5-9 anyway (55 eFG%), 7 AST but only 2 TO. Every drive to the basket seemed to result in a positive outcome. His minutes are now at parity with Chalmers and Robinson pretty much, so we may be seeing the evolution of a team with three interchangeable guards who play based on matchups and performance that day. Arthur had a lackluster, foul-plagued day, making the most of his 12 minutes by making 2-4 FG, getting 4 REB and even grabbing 3 STL. Chalmers, meanwhile, really struggled from the field. He shot only 1-of-8 but did make all four of his FT's. He chipped in 4 REB, 2 AST, 4 STL, 1 BLK and 2 TO's. The reason his rating doesn't look as bad as one might expect is that he played 34 minutes of an impressive team performance. There's credit in there somewhere, right? Some might argue that Robinson didn't have nearly as bad a game as his numbers would dictate. For one, this was a game that required KU to break the press and fend off constant pressure, meaning our guards needed to show poise and awareness. Robinson (like Chalmers and Collins) ended with only 2 TO's on such a day. He also added 5 AST, 1 BLK, 1 STL but shot only 1-5 FG and 2-4 FT. His defense on Matt Lawrence was probably a factor in the first half, although I wasn't tracking him much on defense this game. Kaun played just 8 ineffective minutes, missing his 3 shots, getting 2 REB and 1 BLK. This was too fast a game for Kaun, and Self adjusted accordingly. On MU's side, Grimes and Hannah were the players who really showed up. Unfortunately for MU, Hannah fouled out during the Tigers' last attempt at a late-game run. Before fouling out, Hannah had 19 PTS (61 eFG%), 4 REB, 5 AST, 3 STL but also committed a costly 5 TO. Grimes was a stud on the boards with 9 REB (3 OR), shot 6-9 FG, 4-4 FT, 1 BLK and only 2 TO in 28 minutes. By and large, the rest of the MU players struggled to contribute much. Matt Lawrence did a decent job of shooting but not much else. Marshall Brown really struggled with just 3 points in 19 minutes.
Email this page to your friendCopyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||