Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

Preview: Texas at Kansas

March 2, 2007

Texas at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)

  Kansas Texas

Talent Indicators

   
Div I Records 26-4 22-7
AP Rank 3 15
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
2 18
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
6 21
RPI 16 31
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)
vs Florida (# 6) W 82-80 (OT)
@ Oklahoma (# 24) W 67-65
vs Texas A&M (# 3) W 98-96 2OT
@ Oklahoma (# 24) W 68-58

Predictions
This section gives you a flavor of what different prediction techniques indicate for this game.

   
Vegas Oddsmakers Win by 9
Est. Projection: 79-70
 
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
TBD  
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) Win by 11.5  
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)
Win 79-67
88% chance of victory
 
Last 10 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 7 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 3 other most recent games regardless of location.  If 7 venue-appropriate games not available, fewer than 10 total games are used.)
Win by 11.3
97.1% chance of victory
 
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(30% Vegas + 20% Prediction Tracker + 15% Sagarin + 15% Pomeroy + 20% Last 10)
Win by 10.6
Est. Projection: 79-68
(Does not include Prediction Tracker)
 
 

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season

Explanation of Ratings
Note: ePSAN70 weighs recent games more, but cPSAN70 weighs all games equally

Kansas

ePSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
ePSAN ("Total Impact")
 

PLAYER ePSAN70 ePSAN
Julian Wright 6.61 135.35
Darnell Jackson 6.51 72.04
Jeremy Case* 5.36 11.13
Mario Chalmers 5.16 113.80
Darrell Arthur 4.91 69.51
Brady Morningstar* 4.76 8.78
Sherron Collins 4.62 81.83
Sasha Kaun 4.37 55.27
Russell Robinson 4.25 83.17
Brandon Rush 3.81 91.86
Brennan Bechard* 2.90 1.70
Rodrick Stewart* 1.88 6.54
Matt Kleinmann* 0.02 0.03
Brad Witherspoon* -5.83 -2.30

* Rating not based on enough data.

Texas

cPSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
cPSAN ("Total Impact")
 

 
 
PLAYER cPSAN70 cPSAN
Kevin Durant 7.64 191.98
Craig Winder* 5.58 19.06
Dexter Pittman* 4.50 16.58
Connor Atchley 3.05 39.37
D.J. Augustin 2.78 69.13
Damion James 2.75 51.58
A.J. Abrams 1.84 45.79
Matt Hill 1.55 8.70
Justin Mason 0.72 15.41
Harrison Smith* -0.99 -1.09
J.D. Lewis* -1.82 -8.22
Ian Mooney* -4.21 -2.48

* Rating not based on enough data.

 


Player Analysis:
(largely based on ratings above)

More Note that Durant's rating is so much more disproportionate to his teammates than that of Julian Wright.  Texas opponents know that Durant is the one player that will kill them, but he still manages to score nearly 30 points a game.  It's really incredible, but his adjusted efficiency level does not tower over that of Julian Wright.  Why?  Because for all his efforts, Texas still hasn't performed nearly at the level that Kansas has.

There is significant balance throughout the Jayhawk lineup.  The least efficient player is still the 3rd biggest contributor (Rush, ePSAN).  There are forwards at the top of the efficiency chart (ePSAN70), while plenty of guards are near the top for total impact (ePSAN).  You never know who's going to come up big for KU, and that may be what keeps opponents up at night scouting the team.

See my comprehensive player analysis based on conference-only ratings here.

 

 

Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
Note: There are 336 Div-I teams
(Source: KenPom.com)

Kansas

Texas

  • Offense #18 - Defense #1 - Tempo #61
  • Very solid in the all-important eFG% category: #32 shooting, #3 allowed
  • Rank #30 in 2FG% shooting and #2 in 2FG% allowed
  • Rank #35 in 3FG% allowed
  • Ranked #37 in forcing TO's by opponents, including #17 in STL
  • Dominant rebounding on both ends (#29 O-REB%, #19 opp O-REB%)
  • Dominates the blocking game, #2 in BLK and #32 in avoiding BLK
  • Ranks #311 in % of FGA's that are 3FG

Individual Player Highlights: (thru Sun Feb 25)

  • Mario Chalmers - #7 STL rate
  • Russell Robinson - #135 FT rate, #74 STL rate
  • Julian Wright - #182 O-Reb%, #115 D-Reb%, #102 BLK rate
  • Darrell Arthur - #61 O-Reb%, #47 BLK rate
  • Offense #3 - Defense #58 - Tempo #103
  • Excellent job of controlling the ball but poor at forcing TO's (#16 lowest TO rate, #249 at forcing)
  • Rank #38 in O-Reb%
  • Rank #31 in keeping opponents' FT rate low
  • Great % shooting behind the arc (#19) and great at minimizing opponent 2FG% (#21)
  • Excellent at blocking opponents (#20)
  • Opponents take a ton of their shots from 3FG (#262 lowest)

Individual Player Highlights: (thru Sun Feb 25)

  • Kevin Durant - #19 D-Reb%, #142 BLK rate
  • A.J. Abrams - #80 TO rate (good)
  • D.J. Augustin - #150 FT rate, #24 AST rate
  • Damion James - #153 FT rate, #198 BLK rate
  • Connor Atchley - #191 O-Reb%, #44 BLK rate
Scoring Distribution:
  • On offense, KU relies very heavily on 2FG's, while its opponents rely heavily on 3FG's at the expense of 2FG's.
  • On offense, UT relies more on 3FG's at the expense of 2FG's, while its opponents rely very heavily on 3FG's.

Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category  
Clear Advantage for Kansas No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Texas
Texas 2pt FG%**    
Kansas 3pt FG%    
Kansas TO rate    
Kansas OREB**    
  Texas % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Texas eFG%  
  Texas FT%  
  Kansas PTS/Poss  
  Kansas eFG%  
  Texas % Poss STL by Opp  
  Texas OREB  
  Texas PTS/Poss  
  Kansas 2pt FG%  
  Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Kansas % Poss STL by Opp  
  Texas 3pt FG%  
  Texas TO rate  
  Texas FT Rate  
    Kansas FT%
    Kansas FT Rate**

 

Texas will take above avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Texas will have below avg % of FG's assisted
Expect uptempo game

 

 

Game Outlook

What a fascinating matchup.  The nation's 3rd most efficient offense (Texas) takes on the #1-rated defense (Kansas) with conference championship implications on the line.  Looking at overall season statistics, we might expect the following for this game:

  • UT will struggle shooting except for 3FG's, but UT is expected to take a very high percent of its shots from deep anyway.
  • KU should have an easier time with offensive efficiency, as they will keep TO's low, get plenty of second-chance opportunities and make a high percentage from behind the arc.
  • Though Texas may not shoot a terribly high percentage there, UT should own the freethrow line in this game.
  • It should be an uptempo game. (72 possessions versus NCAA average of 67)

It's not really a question of whether Durant will have a big game.  He always does.  The real question is how hard he has to work for his points and whether his teammates will provide enough support to give them victory.

There's good reason to believe that KU will be efficient on offense this game.  The two factors that have correlated most with KU's offensive efficiency and Texas' defensive efficiency have been eFG% and TO rate.  From the strengths and weaknesses analysis above, we can see that KU is expected to keep its TO's low.  The eFG% will be more of a challenge, but given the expected faster tempo, there should be plenty of fastbreak opportunities and somewhat lax defense that can keep KU's offense flowing.  The fact that the Jayhawks are expected to own the offensive boards will also drive their offensive efficiency higher.

When Texas has the ball, it will mostly be about their eFG%.  Can they shoot well against KU's vaunted defense?  KU hasn't allowed 40 eFG% in its last five games, and hasn't allowed 50 eFG% in its last seven.  Not coincidentally, it was Texas A&M who last accomplished that feat (53.7) in a huge showdown.  We'll see if KU has learned from their lapses in that game.  The freethrow line may also play a significant role for Texas, as the Jayhawks have a tendency to foul more than their opponents.  Durant and Augustin may have a field day at the line if KU isn't careful.

Most of the predictive factors for this game point to a comfortable Jayhawk win.  It's on their home floor, and they're playing for a #1 seed in the NCAA's as well.  The reason it's difficult to believe it will be an easy win for KU is that anything can happen when a team has Kevin Durant, KU failed the last time such a big showdown happened, and Texas is playing for a share of the conference title themselves.  The safest prediction is for this game to fall somewhere between what the stats argue and what the tension dictates.

Sports and Numbers Prediction: Kansas wins 81-75.

 

 

Pre-Game Keys to Watch For

Keys to Watch For

Metric

Result

Edge (Comments)

KU has a tendency to struggle in games where its TO rate is high.  In a game against offensive juggernaut Texas, it can't afford to waste possessions. KU to limit TO's to 20% of possessions    
Texas has a propensity to give up offensive boards, especially on the road.  To have a chance, they must keep KU away from second-chance points. UT to limit KU O-Reb% to 33% (calculated as KU OR / [KU OR + UT DR])    
Durant is going to score.  KU has to keep the rest of the team from shooting effectively. KU to limit non-Durant players to 45 eFG% or less    


Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy