Home
Kansas Basketball
NCAA Basketball
Basketball Conference Simulations
Basketball Player Ratings Explanation

Football

Radio Appearances
Newsletter
Links
Contact

 

 

Preview: Kansas vs Ball State

November 23, 2006

Kansas vs Ball State (Las Vegas, NV)

  Kansas Ball State

Talent Indicators

   
Div I Records 3-1 2-1
RPI 170 320
Sagarin Power Ranking 41 244
Pomeroy Pythagorean Rating 27 239
Best games this season (RPI) vs Tennessee State (#137) W89-54 vs Prairie View A&M (#202) W65-48

Predictions

   
Vegas Oddsmakers Win 78-57  
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) Win by 19.5  
Analysis of Variance
(Uses level and consistency of team performance - power ratings)
83.6% chance of victory  
Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted Prediction Win 75-49  
 

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season

Explanation of Ratings
Note: ePSAN70 weighs recent games more, but cPSAN70 weighs all games equally

Kansas

ePSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
ePSAN ("Total Impact")
 

NAME ePSAN70 ePSAN
Darrell Arthur 7.92 19.77
Julian Wright 6.26 18.56
Jeremy Case* 5.21 1.76
Darnell Jackson 4.57 9.65
Russell Robinson 2.77 8.58
Mario Chalmers 2.43 6.64
Sherron Collins 2.14 4.60
Sasha Kaun 1.42 0.35
Brandon Rush 0.79 2.41
Brady Morningstar 0.44 0.30
Brennan Bechard* -0.80 -0.09
Matt Kleinmann* -1.37 -1.15
Rodrick Stewart* -2.62 -2.11
Brad Witherspoon* -5.80 -0.46

* Rating not based on enough data.

Ball State

cPSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
cPSAN ("Total Impact")
 

 
 
PLAYER cPSAN70 cPSAN
Jalon Perryman 5.20 9.22
Chris Ames (Injured) 3.61 2.02
Zack Garcia* 3.33 0.08
Anthony Newell 1.29 2.77
Brandon Lampley* 0.00 0.00
Steve Horton -0.81 -1.79
Rashaun McLemore -0.84 -0.67
Ahmaad Cook* -1.52 -0.11
D'Andre Peyton -1.63 -2.93
Micah Rollin -1.78 -2.28
Julien 'Skip' Mills -3.77 -1.32
Peyton Stovall -4.73 -10.47
Jarelle Redden -7.64 -5.70

* Rating not based on enough data.

 


Player Analysis:
(largely based on ratings above)

The only players with significant playing time who have positive overall ratings for Ball State are Jalon Perryman nad Anthony Newell.  Unfortunately for them, Chris Ames is out with a broken jaw.  In the first three games, there isn't a whole lot of great play going on outside of Perryman.  He is doing pretty much everything well except maybe 3FG shooting, which is unfortunate since he is a 6-4 shooting guard.  He has managed to avoid TO's so far, though we'll see if that trend continues against KU's tough defense.

Steve Horton and D'Andre Peyton have so-so numbers in the first 3 games.  Horton is passing extremely well (7:1 AST:TO ratio!) but is shooting miserably (29% overall).  Peyton is struggling with TO's and somewhat subpar shooting.

The other major player, Peyton Stovall (6-1 G), averages nearly 32 min/g but is really hurting with his shooting.  He does have a fair AST:TO ratio of 1.8:1, but with all the minutes he's playing, his productivity is just not keeping pace ... at least on paper.  Ball St. followers probably have a different feel for his play.

For KU, things are starting to get back to normal after a tough early loss.  Leading the way in the ratings are freshman dynamo Darrell Arthur and highlight-magnet Julian Wright.  They both dominate the stats but in slightly different ways.  Arthur is more of a scoring and rebounding machine up front, while Wright does everything from AST to STL to BLK, all while scoring and rebounding at a nice clip.  It is somewhat surprising that KU's top 3 performers are all frontline players, when everyone expected KU's backcourt to be its biggest strength.

Darnell Jackson continues to produce.  He relies a lot upon others creating his opportunities, but he is converting and showing up in the right place at the right time.  Meanwhile, Russell Robinson continues to be the team's heart and soul.  As of today, Robinson is one of two players (Wright) whose game-to-game rating variability are significant in accounting for KU's team variability.  He is extremely important to KU's game, but it would be oh so nice if he could shoot better.

Sherron Collins had himself a stellar game against Tennessee State, going 4-6 from behind the arc.  Sasha Kaun is being eased back into things after a partially torn patellar tendon.  He played 9 minutes the last game and showed that he is ready to be an efficient contributor.  Look for his +1.42 efficiency rating to climb steadily from here and probably nestle somewhere around the +4 level.

Brandon Rush is clearly talented and very capable of changing the game.  Opponents will focus on him given his national reputation, so some of the depressed rating you see is simply that.  But it is increasingly obvious that he is playing nowhere near what he's capable of and what many fans expected.  Although his overall averages look pretty good right now (scoring, rebounding, shooting percentages), the dynamics of each game have been such that his contributions were not as important when he provided them, and his lack of contributions came at particularly important times (i.e., ORU loss).  Regardless, it is extremely unlikely that Rush's efficiency rating will hover this low for very long.  A simple law of averages would say he is due for some really good games over the next couple of weeks.  I'm sure KU hopes it starts this weekend.

 

 

Efficiency Analysis

Kansas

Ball State

  • KU plays at a below-average tempo, with a strong offense and defense.
  • KU typically wins the shooting percentage battle (eFG%) and controls the offensive glass on both sides.
  • KU loses and forces a lot of steals.
  • KU usually wins the blocks game on both ends
  • KU shoots an unusually low number of shots from behind the arc.

 

  • BSU plays at a snail's pace, with an average offense and terrible defense.
  • On offense, BSU shoots terribly but does a great job at keeping the ball and stellar job at rebounding on the offensive glass.
  • On defense, BSU does a terrible job keeping opponents off the offensive glass but is one of the nation's best at forcing TO's.
  • BSU hardly blocks any shots.
  • Nobody shoots particularly well on either side in BSU's games.
Other Efficiency Notes:
  • On offense, KU relies very heavily on 2FG's, while its opponents slightly favor the 3FG.
  • On offense, BSU tends to score more than usual from FT's at the expense of 3FG's, while opponents favor 2FG's at the expense of 3FG's.

 

Game Outlook

A few things we can expect from the efficiency analysis above:

  • KU will own the offensive glass
  • BSU will not shoot a high percentage from the field
  • KU is likely to turn the ball over often
  • Tempo should be somewhat slow
  • BSU won't block many shots
  • KU will score more than usual from the inside (or at least 2FG's)

Keep in mind that the only adjusted figures for efficiency are the overall offense/defense and tempo.  All the other stuff (i.e., offensive rebounding, eFG%, TO's) are from raw figures.  So, that means we have to realize that Ball State's specific category strengths have come while playing an extremely weak schedule (N. Colorado, Prairie View, Chattanooga).  And although KU's schedule hasn't been much more impressive, it's strong adjusted figures for offense and defense make its strengths in other categories more plausible.

With Sasha Kaun available for some minutes now, KU should be able to dominate Ball State inside.  Any perimeter scoring for the Jayhawks would be icing on the proverbial cake.  And it's not hard to imagine that happening, just that KU will probably focus on its inside game first.  Also, keep in mind that KU plays Florida the next night, so if they are comfortably ahead in the 2nd half, the backups should get lots of playing time.  That may keep the score a bit closer than you'd normally expect.

If BSU is to have any chance at keeping it close, it has to be forcing KU turnovers, keeping the tempo ultra slow, and hoping KU doesn't shoot well from the field.

Sports and Numbers Prediction: Kansas wins 78-55.  (incidentally, Vegas odds were not out when I made this prediction ... eerily similar)

 

 

Pre-Game Keys to Watch For

Keys to Watch For

Metric

Result

Edge (Comments)

BSU must force KU into lots of TO's Kansas to commit TO's on more than 25% of possessions (avg game 70 poss = 17.5 TO's)    
Faster the tempo, the more it favors Kansas Is tempo <65 possessions or 75+?  Anything in between probably won't influence much    
KU will own the offensive glass, so BSU better keep KU's shooting percentage very low KU eFG% of less than 45%    


Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign up here
Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter.

Email this page to your friend

Copyright © 2006 Sports and Numbers. All Rights Reserved.  Terms of Use  Privacy Policy