|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preview: Kansas at NebraskaJanuary 28, 2007 Kansas at Nebraska (Lincoln, NE)
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This SeasonExplanation of
Ratings
* Rating not based on enough data.
|
NebraskacPSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70
possessions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PLAYER | cPSAN70 | cPSAN |
| Aleks Maric | 5.59 | 61.63 |
| Choul Laam* | 4.04 | 0.82 |
| Marcus Perry | 3.62 | 27.30 |
| Jim Ledsome | 3.44 | 11.56 |
| Charles Richardson Jr. | 3.03 | 45.69 |
| Ryan Anderson | 2.85 | 27.58 |
| Jamel White | 2.01 | 21.10 |
| Paul Velander | 1.08 | 4.44 |
| Jay-R Strowbridge | 0.17 | 1.01 |
| Sek Henry | -0.26 | -2.84 |
| Chris Balham* | -0.40 | -0.75 |
| Mike Smith* | -2.36 | -3.43 |
| Kyle Marks* | -2.95 | -5.89 |
| Nick Krenk* | -3.18 | -2.24 |
| Kris Douse | -3.29 | -5.07 |
| Glenn White* | -3.97 | -1.17 |
* Rating not based on enough data.
Player analysis provided not provided here but will be here in future write-ups.
Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
|
|
|
Kansas |
Nebraska |
Individual Player Highlights: (thru Sun Jan 21)
|
Individual Player Highlights: (thru Sun Jan 21)
|
Other Efficiency Notes:
|
|
Strengths and weaknesses table not provided here for this game but will return in future previews.
KU is a different team on the road, and Nebraska is a different team at home. Most of the season trends are going to be skewed in the Cornhuskers' direction as a result. First, let's look at what those season trends would dictate, without taking into account the venue for this game:
Sounds like a recipe for an easy KU victory, right? But KU doesn't shut down opponents' offensive rebounds on the road much and even struggled at home against lowly Colorado. Blocks are less frequent on the road for KU. Margin of turnovers has been much less in favor of Kansas the last several games, so it's easier to imagine that NU would win that battle or at least stay even. And since the overall efficiency numbers show NU's offense having something of a chance against KU's defense, then it could be a long day for the Jayhawks, who have a tendency to make life difficult for themselves on offense.
Nebraska is only 1-4 in its last five games, but they split the two home games during that stretch, including an understandable one-point loss to Texas. With a player the caliber of Maric, a strong home record, and KU's inconsistency, the Jayhawks should actually be only a slim favorite in this one. What actually happens tomorrow is a product of chance, so even though KU should be a slim favorite, I am going with the Cornhuskers for the upset. Not what I want as a KU fan, but this one just doesn't smell right.
Sports and Numbers Prediction: Nebraska wins 65-63.
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For |
|||
|
Keys to Watch For |
Metric |
Result |
Edge (Comments) |
| KU must return to its rebounding dominance to shut down NU's offense and keep its own offense alive. | KU to hold at least 8% advantage in O-REB% (calculated for each team as O-REB / [O-REB + opp D-REB]) | ||
| NU has to seize its expected ability to force KU turnovers | NU to force at least 22% TO rate on KU possessions | ||
| NU will use the 3FG plenty, but even KU may exploit the perimeter as most of NU's opponents have | Either team with advantage of at least 8% in 3FG shooting percentage | ||
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
|
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy