|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preview: Kansas at DePaulDecember 2, 2006 Kansas at DePaul (Chicago, IL)
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This SeasonExplanation of
Ratings
* Rating not based on enough data.
|
DePaulcPSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70
possessions)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PLAYER | cPSAN70 | cPSAN |
| Thijin Moses* | 6.82 | 2.96 |
| Lorenzo Thompson* | 5.26 | 2.28 |
| Wilson Chandler | 2.39 | 10.58 |
| Marcus Heard | 1.84 | 5.67 |
| Cliff Clinkscales | 1.26 | 1.87 |
| Wesley Green | 1.08 | 1.58 |
| Karron Clarke | 0.57 | 2.04 |
| Draelon Burns | 0.25 | 0.74 |
| Will Walker | 0.24 | 0.65 |
| Sammy Mejia | -1.13 | -4.84 |
| Jabari Currie | -2.93 | -7.57 |
* Rating not based on enough data.
Having just returned from a trip, I won't get too much into this. DePaul appears to rely most on contributions from Wilson Chandler and Marcus Heard. Neither is particularly efficient, however, as you might expect given DePaul's poor performance this season. Sammy Mejia and Jabari Currie have had the most negative impact, the former mostly because of 4-21 shooting from behind the arc. Other than that, Mejia actually isn't performing too badly. The problem is that the last time the senior guard shot anywhere over 30% from three-point land was his freshman season. Chandler is the consistent scoring threat inside, and he's only a sophomore at 6-8 and 230 pounds. He may have a rough time because of foul trouble against KU's much deeper front line.
Nevertheless, there are plenty of big bodies for DePaul to challenge KU's inside strength. Chandler, Heard, and Green will be the major tests for Darrell Arthur and Julian Wright. It shouldn't be too big a "test" though, as the athleticism for those two should cause matchup problems for the Blue Demons.
KU's backcourt has been coming around a bit more of late. Robinson has been solid pretty much the whole season, while Chalmers is just now coming into his own in terms of perimeter shooting. He has also been driving into the lane with success. Once KU starts facing stronger opponents, the backcourt may have to step up their game more, as inside shots get more and more tough to come by.
A couple of players who have interesting storylines are Rush and Kaun. Rush has performed below preseason expectations all season long, but his strong work on defense and clutch performance in a win against Florida continue to show his value to the team. If he breaks through with a strong and efficient offensive game to go with all the other things he's doing, his bandwagon will start to fill up once more. Kaun has been off ever since his return from a knee injury. In limited minutes, he has shown very little offense or defense and has missed some easy dunks. From what Coach Self says, Sasha should be fine after some time to get reconditioned and readjusted. It will be interesting to see if this game provides that opportunity.
Highlighted Efficiency Statistics |
|
|
Kansas |
DePaul |
|
|
Other Efficiency Notes:
|
|
NOTE: From top to bottom, the statistics are sorted
such that, at the top are the greatest advantages to the team on the left,
and at the bottom are the greatest advantages for the team on the right.
| Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for DePaul |
| Kansas Strength - Kansas 2pt FG% | ||
| Kansas eFG% | ||
| Kansas TO rate | ||
| DePaul FT Rate | ||
| Kansas Strength - Kansas Points Per Possession | ||
| DePaul FT% | ||
| Kansas 3pt FG% | ||
| DePaul OREB | ||
| Kansas Strength - DePaul % Poss STL by Opp | ||
| Kansas % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Kansas Strength - DePaul Points Per Possession | ||
| DePaul 3pt FG% | ||
| Kansas Strength - DePaul eFG% | ||
| DePaul TO rate | ||
| DePaul 2pt FG% | ||
| DePaul % Poss Blocked by Opp | ||
| Kansas FT Rate | ||
| Kansas OREB | ||
| Kansas FT% | ||
| Kansas % Poss STL by Opp |
| Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted |
| Kansas plays faster tempo than DePaul |
If there are any clear advantages in this game, they point in the favor of Kansas. DePaul's best hope is to minimize those advantages for KU, which are:
Kansas may be poised to have a very efficient offensive game, as they will likely shoot well from the field, not turn it over too often, and have shown a strong ability to grab offensive rebounds all season long. Too many weapons for Kansas. The only thing that is the "X factor" here is the venue. If KU loses poise on the road, anything could happen, but that's not the likely event.
Sports and Numbers Prediction: Kansas wins 79-67.
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For |
|||
|
Keys to Watch For |
Metric |
Result |
Edge (Comments) |
| DePaul has shut down offensive rebounds for opponents before, so if KU struggles shooting, the offensive rebounds better be there | If KU shoots less than 50% eFG, KU to grab at least 35% of available O-Reb (calculated as KU O-Reb / [KU O-Reb + DU D-Reb]) | ||
| Though not a clear advantage for either side, one of the less favorable categories for KU is DePaul's ability to steal from them. On the road, KU may be careless with the ball. | DePaul to have STL on 12% of KU poss. | ||
|
Sports and Numbers Newsletter - sign
up here Get notified of updates to the site. Some features written exclusively for newsletter. |
|
|
Copyright © 2006 Sports and
Numbers. All Rights
Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy
Policy