|
Nov 17, 2008 |
Kansas 71 - UMKC 56 PSAN
"Total Impact" RatingsAll ratings are adjusted for quality of opponent | PSAN70
"Efficiency" RatingsPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Cole Aldrich
Lowest Composite: Femi Akinpetide (PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.
For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 4.15 | -0.83 | 4.98 | | Travis Releford | 2.90 | -0.86 | 3.75 | | Markieff Morris | -1.32 | -2.89 | 1.58 | | Marcus Morris* | -0.27 | -0.84 | 0.57 | | Sherron Collins | -0.07 | -0.29 | 0.22 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -1.15 | -0.87 | -0.28 | | Tyrel Reed | -0.57 | 0.01 | -0.58 | | Quintrell Thomas | -1.83 | -0.73 | -1.09 | | Brady Morningstar | -1.78 | -0.09 | -1.68 | | Conner Teahan* | -1.41 | 0.59 | -2.00 | For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | D. Brumagin | 2.76 | -1.13 | 3.90 | | J. Humphrey | -0.38 | -1.45 | 1.07 | | R. Hamilton | 1.32 | 0.29 | 1.03 | | L. Mushatt | -2.20 | -1.93 | -0.27 | | D. Brady | -0.57 | 0.10 | -0.68 | | T. McKinney-Jones | -0.37 | 0.73 | -1.10 | | S. Johnson | -0.86 | 0.94 | -1.81 | | D. Dibble | -1.25 | 0.65 | -1.89 | | F. Ford | -3.56 | -0.51 | -3.05 | | F. Akinpetide | -1.92 | 1.18 | -3.10 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Travis Releford
Lowest Composite: Conner Teahan (PSAN70-O = Offensive efficiency, PSAN70-D = Defensive efficiency.
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Travis Releford | 8.66 | -2.56 | 11.22 | | Cole Aldrich | 7.34 | -1.47 | 8.80 | | Marcus Morris* | -1.29 | -4.08 | 2.79 | | Markieff Morris | -1.76 | -3.88 | 2.11 | | Sherron Collins | -0.08 | -0.30 | 0.23 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -2.34 | -1.78 | -0.56 | | Tyrel Reed | -0.66 | 0.01 | -0.67 | | Brady Morningstar | -3.14 | -0.17 | -2.97 | | Quintrell Thomas | -5.92 | -2.38 | -3.53 | | Conner Teahan* | -13.68 | 5.77 | -19.45 | For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | D. Brumagin | 3.58 | -1.47 | 5.05 | | J. Humphrey | -0.77 | -2.96 | 2.19 | | R. Hamilton | 1.90 | 0.42 | 1.49 | | L. Mushatt | -2.68 | -2.34 | -0.33 | | T. McKinney-Jones | -0.71 | 1.42 | -2.13 | | D. Brady | -2.22 | 0.40 | -2.62 | | S. Johnson | -1.86 | 2.04 | -3.90 | | D. Dibble | -3.23 | 1.67 | -4.90 | | F. Ford | -7.68 | -1.09 | -6.59 | | F. Akinpetide | -6.78 | 4.17 | -10.95 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
|
Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | UMKC
| Offensive Performance
| 95.0
| 87.2 | | Defensive Performance | 87.5 | 95.3 | Comments This was a superb defensive effort by Kansas and a subpar offensive output. Overall, a slightly worse night for the Kangaroos than it was a good night for the Jayhawks. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | UMKC
| | eFG% | 13.9
| | | TO Rate | | 0.9
| | O-Reb% | 0.6
| | | Freethrows | FT Pct | 2.8
| | | FT Attempts | 10.2
| |
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 49-36% | | TO Rate (lo better) | UMKC 21-19% | | O-Reb% | KU 29-27%
| | FT Rate | KU 50-18% | Bottom Line
| The difference at the FT line nearly equaled the lopsided advantage the Jayhawks had in shooting from the field. Everything else was pretty even.
| | |