Sports and Numbers

Newsletter

 
Recap: Kansas at Temple Print E-mail
Jan 3, 2010

Kansas 84 - Temple 52

 PSAN
"Total Impact" Ratings

All ratings are adjusted for quality of opponent

PSAN70
"Efficiency" Ratings

PSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions"

 

Ratings on the Court

Highest Composite: Sherron Collins
Lowest Composite: Juan Fernandez

 

 (PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.
For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.)

 

PLAYER PSAN-O PSAN-D PSAN-Comp
Sherron Collins 8.03 -3.45 11.48
Tyshawn Taylor 5.13 -2.85 7.97
Brady Morningstar 5.09 -1.89 6.98
Cole Aldrich 1.82 -4.11 5.93
Xavier Henry 4.25 -1.29 5.54
Markieff Morris 3.42 -2.06 5.48
Marcus Morris 2.15 -2.56 4.70
Tyrel Reed 1.69 -1.68 3.37
C.J. Henry* 3.15 1.10 2.05
Jeff Withey* 0.00 -0.25 0.25
Jordan Juenemann* 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elijah Johnson* 0.10 0.20 -0.10
Chase Buford* -0.18 0.20 -0.38
Conner Teahan* -1.07 -0.26 -0.82
Thomas Robinson* 0.27 1.35 -1.08

 

 

 

For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better

 

PLAYER PSAN-O PSAN-D PSAN-Comp
Lavoy Allen 2.14 1.35 0.79
Craig Williams 1.96 1.36 0.60
Luis Guzman -1.17 -1.63 0.46
Ramone Moore 1.44 1.05 0.38
Scootie Randall -0.01 0.04 -0.05
Ryan Brooks 0.62 0.81 -0.18
Carmel Bouchman* 0.00 0.40 -0.40
T.J. DiLeo* -0.58 -0.03 -0.54
Micheal Eric -1.56 -0.99 -0.57
Rafael DeLeon* -0.80 -0.03 -0.77
Khalif Wyatt* -1.27 0.00 -1.27
Rahlir Jefferson -1.62 0.52 -2.13
Juan Fernandez -3.05 0.05 -3.10

 

 

*Rating not based on enough data.

 

 

 

 Ratings on the Court

Highest Composite: Brady Morningstar
Lowest Composite: Rahlir Jefferson

 

 (PSAN70-O = Offensive efficiency, PSAN70-D = Defensive efficiency.
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better.)

 

PLAYER PSAN70-O PSAN70-D PSAN70-Comp
Brady Morningstar 13.39 -4.97 18.36
Sherron Collins 12.06 -5.18 17.24
Markieff Morris 8.98 -5.42 14.41
Tyshawn Taylor 8.29 -4.61 12.90
C.J. Henry* 18.94 6.60 12.33
Tyrel Reed 5.47 -5.43 10.90
Xavier Henry 7.44 -2.27 9.71
Cole Aldrich 2.94 -6.64 9.58
Marcus Morris 3.93 -4.67 8.60
Jeff Withey* 0.00 -5.24 5.24
Jordan Juenemann* 0.00 0.00 0.00
Elijah Johnson* 1.04 2.06 -1.02
Thomas Robinson* 1.42 7.12 -5.70
Chase Buford* -3.89 4.12 -8.01
Conner Teahan* -11.27 -2.68 -8.59

 

  

  

 For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better

 

PLAYER PSAN70-O PSAN70-D PSAN70-Comp
Craig Williams 7.49 5.18 2.30
Ramone Moore 4.65 3.41 1.24
Lavoy Allen 3.10 1.95 1.14
Luis Guzman -1.70 -2.36 0.66
Scootie Randall -0.03 0.14 -0.17
Ryan Brooks 0.75 0.97 -0.22
Micheal Eric -5.48 -3.48 -1.99
Juan Fernandez -3.78 0.06 -3.84
T.J. DiLeo* -4.86 -0.29 -4.57
Rahlir Jefferson -6.18 1.97 -8.15
Carmel Bouchman* 0.00 8.48 -8.48
Khalif Wyatt* -13.35 0.00 -13.35
Rafael DeLeon* -16.88 -0.72 -16.16

 

 

*Rating not based on enough data.

 

 

 

Player Performance Analysis

 

As Bill Self said, it didn't matter who was on the court for the Jayhawks, they played well.  In an unbelievable display of efficiency, the lowest ePSAN70-Comp for any KU player with at least 10 minutes was that of Marcus Morris ... a stellar +8.60!  Three guys rated above 14, five players above 10.  Where to begin when so many players were amazing?

 

We'll start with the heart and soul of this Jayhawks team, Sherron Collins.  The tough point guard set the tone early with his scoring outburst and maintained efficiency and poise all throughout.  He finished as the second-leading scorer (14 PTS) on 78 eFG% shooting (2-of-4 from downtown) and added 4 AST, 3 STL and 0 TO.  His combination of efficiency and playing time resulted in, by far, the best contribution on paper for the Jayhawks.

 

Next up, we'll examine two players who are often compared, as some believe one should replace the other in the starting lineup.  Both Tyshawn Taylor and Brady Morningstar had super efforts.  Morningstar was more efficient though, the most efficient of anyone this day.  In just 15 MIN, he made his one shot (3FG), dished 5 AST with 0 TO and even chipped in 3 REB.  Taylor played 26 MIN and tallied 8 PTS on 75 eFG%, 5 REB, 2 AST, 2 TO and 0 STL.  Remember, turnovers are more costly when the team is efficient on offense.  Either way, great job collectively at the number two position for KU this time around.

 

Both of the Morris twins had strong efforts, but on paper, Markieff was stronger.  Markieff shot better (67 vs 50 eFG%), grabbed more REB (4 vs 3), same STL and 1 more AST in only two-thirds the number of minutes his brother Marcus played.

 

Cole Aldrich hurt his cause with 3 TO and only a 50 eFG% on a day when everyone else was shooting lights out.  Though he pulled down 10 REB, only 1 was OREB.  Xavier Henry did a nice job of scoring on 56 eFG% shooting, but he didn't do much else to help and even committed 2 TO's.

 

Offensive and Defensive Performance

 

Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team.  That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense.  This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams.

 

 

(pts per 100 poss) Kansas Temple
Offensive Performance 150.7 94.0
Defensive Performance 73.6 104.2
ANALYSIS: These are just eye-popping figures for Kansas.  I can't recall ever seeing any better than this.  When KU had the ball, this was all about KU scoring at an out-of-this-world rate against a solid defense.  When Temple had the ball, sure the Owls struggled, but it was an absolute clinic by KU.

 

Four Factor Analysis

(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below)

 

What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team?

Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin)

Statistic MeasuredKansasTemple
eFG%38.1 
TO Rate 4.1
O-Reb%1.0
 
FreethrowsFT Pct2.8
 
FT Attempts 0.8
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pre-Game Projected Key Factors

 


At least 75% likely to be important:

  • Kansas TO% - KU did great (15%), well under the projected 21%.
  • Temple OREB% - Temple only grabbed 26% vs the 32% projected.

 

Between 50-75% likely to be important:

  • Temple TO% - Amazing job by Temple, the only facet of the game they excelled (9% vs projected 20%)
  • Temple eFG% - A paltry 29% won't do against anyone, let alone the nation's best.

 

Between 25-50% likely to be important:

  • Kansas OREB% - Slightly better than the 27% projected (29%) but nothing to write home about.
 
BOTTOM LINE - KU was projected to win 63-58, which was a 52/48% split of the points, but it actually won with a 62/38% split, an amazing performance.  KU had the edge in the two factors most likely to be important (Kansas TO% and Temple OREB%), while it was a split in the 50-75% likely to be important.  The single biggest of the factors was probably Temple's eFG% being so low, which was captured accurately.  The fact that Temple did so much better than expected in the FT-related categories but didn't even come close to making it a game is encouraging, as none of the FT categories showed up in the "likely to be important" factors.  But again, in a game where KU dominated in so many facets, it is difficult to judge the utility of the regression analysis for Four Factors.
 

Game Projections

 

 
Projection
Actual
Comments

 OVERALL RESULTS

 Final Score  KU 63-58  KU 84-52 
 Tempo (# poss)
 65  67 

 FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES

 eFG%  KU 50-44%  KU 61-29%
 So hard to believe KU could shoot this well against the Temple defense.
 TO Rate (lo better)  TU 21-20%  TU 15-9%
 
 O-Reb%  TU 32-27%
 KU 29-26%
 After 4 straight games of 45% or higher, KU now has 4 straight games of 31% or lower on OREB%.  So, which is the correct representation?
 FT Rate  KU 43-23%
 KU 35-31%
 
 Four Factors Overall
 No dominance in any factor, but slightly better shooting and FT line use is projected to compensate for poor rebounding and keep the Jayhawks undefeated.  The eFG% advantage was impossible to overcome, even with Temple's flawless ball control.  
 

PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played)

 Leading Scorers

 KU - X. Henry, Aldrich/Collins/Marcus Morris

 Opp - Brooks, Fernandez

 KU - X. Henry, Collins

 Opp - Brooks/Fernandez

 
 Highest PSAN-Comp
(game impact)

 KU - Aldrich

 Opp - Williams

 KU - Collins (Aldrich #4)

 Opp - Allen (Williams #2)

 
 Highest PSAN70-Comp
(efficiency)

 KU - Markieff Morris

 Opp - Moore

 KU - Morningstar (Markieff Morris #3)

 Opp - Williams (Moore #2)

 
 Highest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Morningstar, Markieff Morris

 Opp - Williams, Moore

 KU - Collins, Morningstar

 Opp - Williams

 
 Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Reed, Taylor

 Opp - Allen, Jefferson

 KU - None

 Opp - Jefferson, Fernandez

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh