| |
| Recap: Temple at Kansas |
|
|
| Dec 21, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better
*Rating not based on enough data.
My Observations
Is it just me, or does this team look like a different team every time out? It rarely looks like the same team from one timeout to the next sometimes. In the end, it was a relief to see KU's defense as the MVP of this game. That has to be the anchor until the young players get a firmer grasp on their offensive roles. Also, did Self ask the team not to crash the offensive boards? It didn't even look like they were trying to get stickbacks sometimes, but of course a lot of that was due to Aldrich's absence (foul trouble) and/or his propensity to take long jump shots. Probably the most impressive thing to me was that the Jayhawks didn't let up in the last 10 minutes or so and basically were never challenged seriously once they pulled away in the last quarter of the game.
Player Performance Analysis |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Temple |
| Offensive Performance | 113.8 | 110.0 |
| Defensive Performance | 84.1 | 95.2 |
Comments Temple performed fairly well on both sides of the ball, but not the extent that KU did, particularly on defense where KU turned in an overall stifling effort. The funny thing is that these performance numbers are almost exactly the same as each team's adjusted efficiency numbers coming into the game. That is, both teams essentially performed at exactly their expected levels on both sides of the ball. | ||
(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below)
| What did the difference in this statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained | ||
| Statistic Measured | Kansas | Temple | |
| eFG% | 8.2 | | |
| TO Rate | 1.0 | ||
| O-Reb% | 0.5 | ||
| Freethrows | FT Pct | 1.1 | |
| FT Attempts | 3.9 | ||
Projection | Actual | Comments | |
OVERALL RESULTS | |||
| Final Score | KU 75-69 | KU 71-59 | Kudos to Pomeroy's prediction of 72-60, almost perfect! |
| Tempo (# poss) | 66 | 64 | |
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES | |||
| eFG% | Tie 50% | KU 59-51% | Troubling to see the Jayhawks give up such a high eFG% again, but they sure did shoot lights out themselves. |
| TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 20% | KU 20-19% | Mostly because KU was able to limit TO's in the 2nd half to just three. |
| O-Reb% | KU 39-36% | TU 19-17% | Turned out to be as close as projected, but wow did both teams fail to crash the boards on offense! |
| FT Rate | KU 39-23% | TU 23-11% | This was a shocker and completely opposite of trends going into the game. Had the Jayhawks not shot lights out, their failure to utilize the FT line could have been fatal. |
| Four Factors Overall | More tight than some might want to believe, but in the end, it will be KU's ability to get to the FT line much more often that will seal the victory. Still, it is interesting that Temple's offensive performance rating is projected to be so high (125.4). | As evidence has shown, an advantage in eFG% trumps an avantage in FT Rate usually. It was the case for KU on this day. | Very different game than projected in terms of where the advantages would be, but in the end, it added up to a fairly predictable result. |
PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | |||
| Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, Aldrich/Taylor Opp - Christmas, Brooks | KU - Collins, Aldrich Opp - Christmas, Allen | |
| Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact) | KU - Aldrich Opp - Allen | KU - Taylor (Aldrich #2) Opp - Allen | |
| Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency) | KU - Marcus Morris Opp - Moore | KU - Aldrich (Marcus Morris #5) Opp - Allen (Moore #6) | |
| Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Marcus Morris, Reed Opp - Moore, Allen | KU - Taylor, Morningstar Opp - Allen, Christmas | |
| Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Collins, Aldrich Opp - Olmos | KU - Reed, Marcus Morris Opp - Eric, Olmos | Wow, the two KU players struggling most were projected to prosper most. |
| |