|
Recap: Kansas vs Washburn (Exhibition) |
|
|
|
Nov 4, 2008 |
Kansas 98 - Washburn 79 PSAN
"Total Impact" RatingsAll ratings are adjusted for quality of opponent | PSAN70
"Efficiency" RatingsPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Cole Aldrich
Lowest Composite: Conner Teahan (PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.
For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 1.38 | -3.45 | 4.83 | | Tyrel Reed | 6.08 | 1.97 | 4.11 | | Quintrell Thomas | 2.36 | -0.48 | 2.84 | | Tyrone Appleton* | 2.19 | 0.18 | 2.02 | | Sherron Collins | 4.90 | 3.61 | 1.29 | | Brennan Bechard* | 0.00 | 0.36 | -0.36 | | Marcus Morris* | -0.92 | 0.09 | -1.01 | | Travis Releford | -1.41 | -0.31 | -1.10 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -0.94 | 0.36 | -1.30 | | Markieff Morris | -1.90 | 0.37 | -2.27 | | Brady Morningstar | 1.07 | 3.75 | -2.69 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -2.72 | 0.19 | -2.91 | | Conner Teahan | -1.92 | 2.15 | -4.07 | For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Jonathan Leopaul | 3.97 | 1.05 | 2.92 | | Nate Daniels | 2.22 | -0.52 | 2.74 | | Paul Byers | -0.54 | -2.78 | 2.24 | | Garrett Love* | 1.92 | 0.00 | 1.92 | | Lekheythan Malone | 2.73 | 1.15 | 1.58 | | William McNeill | 2.19 | 1.43 | 0.76 | | Darnell Kimble | 2.99 | 2.23 | 0.76 | | Moriba DeCoteau* | 0.00 | 0.19 | -0.19 | | Jeremie Hart | -3.19 | -2.60 | -0.59 | | DeAndre Eggins | 1.66 | 2.46 | -0.79 | | Steve Feighny* | -0.94 | 0.00 | -0.94 | | Logan Stutz | 0.74 | 2.15 | -1.41 | | Mario Scott | -3.97 | -0.75 | -3.21 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Cole Aldrich
Lowest Composite: Conner Teahan
(PSAN70-O = Offensive efficiency, PSAN70-D = Defensive efficiency.
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Tyrone Appleton* | 12.90 | 1.05 | 11.86 | | Cole Aldrich | 2.57 | -6.41 | 8.97 | | Quintrell Thomas | 5.96 | -1.22 | 7.17 | | Tyrel Reed | 7.40 | 2.40 | 5.00 | | Sherron Collins | 5.77 | 4.24 | 1.52 | | Travis Releford | -3.56 | -0.77 | -2.78 | | Brady Morningstar | 1.30 | 4.57 | -3.27 | | Brennan Bechard* | 0.00 | 4.18 | -4.18 | | Marcus Morris* | -4.66 | 0.46 | -5.12 | | Markieff Morris | -4.79 | 0.93 | -5.71 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -6.00 | 0.43 | -6.42 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -5.55 | 2.09 | -7.64 | | Conner Teahan | -5.23 | 5.83 | -11.06 | For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Garrett Love* | 33.89 | 0.00 | 33.89 | | Nate Daniels | 7.13 | -1.67 | 8.80 | | Jonathan Leopaul | 7.37 | 1.95 | 5.42 | | Paul Byers | -0.71 | -3.64 | 2.93 | | Lekheythan Malone | 4.83 | 2.04 | 2.79 | | William McNeill | 7.75 | 5.05 | 2.70 | | Darnell Kimble | 5.55 | 4.15 | 1.40 | | Jeremie Hart | -6.26 | -5.11 | -1.15 | | DeAndre Eggins | 2.55 | 3.77 | -1.22 | | Moriba DeCoteau* | 0.00 | 1.72 | -1.72 | | Logan Stutz | 1.74 | 5.05 | -3.31 | | Mario Scott | -5.19 | -0.98 | -4.20 | | Steve Feighny* | -6.63 | 0.00 | -6.63 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
|
Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. For the exhibition games, I am estimating team efficiencies. For Kansas, I am using the #24 offensive efficiency and defensive effiency from last season, reflecting KU's AP ranking of #24. For Washburn, I am using the #300 offensive and defensive efficiencies, reflecting a fairly weak team but leaving room for them to be somewhat decent for their lower division. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Washburn
| Offensive Performance
| 112.2 | 114.2 | | Defensive Performance | 113.0
| 107.0
| Comments Kansas won this game handily, but it was Washburn that performed better, considering strength of opponent. In particular, the Jayhawks really struggled on defense. Neither team played well defensively, but KU's effort was truly shameful. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | Washburn
| | eFG% | 26.2
| | | TO Rate | -- | --
| | O-Reb% | | 3.0
| | Freethrows | FT Pct | 3.4
| | | FT Attempts | 0.6
| |
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 67-45% | | TO Rate (lo better) | Tied 23% | | O-Reb% | WU 44-36%
| | FT Rate | KU 41-29% | Bottom Line
| An overwhelming shooting advantage put this game away for the Jayhawks. Washburn held the advantage on the boards, but this was mitigated by KU's advantage in shooting percentage at the FT line. | | |