|
Recap: Kansas vs Emporia State (Exhibition) |
|
|
|
Nov 11, 2008 |
Kansas 103 - Emporia State 58 PSAN
"Total Impact" RatingsAll ratings are adjusted for quality of opponent | PSAN70
"Efficiency" RatingsPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Sherron Collins
Lowest Composite: Lamar Wilbern (PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.
For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Sherron Collins | 7.80 | -1.59 | 9.39 | | Cole Aldrich | 5.26 | -3.27 | 8.53 | | Marcus Morris | 1.97 | -2.17 | 4.14 | | Brady Morningstar | 1.87 | -1.26 | 3.13 | | Brennan Bechard* | 2.39 | -0.04 | 2.42 | | Quintrell Thomas | 0.95 | -1.10 | 2.05 | | Tyrel Reed | 0.94 | -0.89 | 1.83 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 1.25 | -0.04 | 1.28 | | Markieff Morris | -0.74 | -1.55 | 0.81 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -0.24 | 0.16 | -0.40 | | Travis Releford | -0.66 | 0.20 | -0.86 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -0.95 | 0.00 | -0.95 | | Conner Teahan | -1.15 | 0.36 | -1.50 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -1.98 | 0.16 | -2.14 | For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Adam Holthaus | 3.61 | 0.83 | 2.78 | | Alex Pyle | 3.54 | 0.94 | 2.60 | | Jordan Stout* | -1.28 | -1.37 | 0.08 | | Doug Moore | -0.70 | -0.41 | -0.29 | | Dustin Burdolski* | -0.64 | 0.00 | -0.64 | | Tim Niles* | -1.52 | 0.07 | -1.59 | | Spencer Allen | -1.36 | 0.65 | -2.02 | | Matt Boswell | 0.24 | 2.32 | -2.07 | | Robert Moores | -0.91 | 1.82 | -2.72 | | Dustin Andrews | -0.95 | 2.08 | -3.03 | | Jeremiah Box | -0.98 | 2.52 | -3.50 | | Shang Ping | -3.56 | 0.62 | -4.18 | | Lamar Wilbern | -5.77 | 2.27 | -8.04 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest Composite: Cole Aldrich
Lowest Composite: Shang Ping
(PSAN70-O = Offensive efficiency, PSAN70-D = Defensive efficiency.
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better.) | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 10.87 | -6.74 | 17.61 | | Sherron Collins | 14.49 | -2.95 | 17.45 | | Brennan Bechard* | 12.68 | -0.19 | 12.86 | | Marcus Morris | 4.59 | -5.03 | 9.62 | | Quintrell Thomas | 2.71 | -3.16 | 5.86 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 5.15 | -0.15 | 5.30 | | Brady Morningstar | 3.16 | -2.12 | 5.28 | | Tyrel Reed | 1.74 | -1.65 | 3.40 | | Markieff Morris | -1.84 | -3.83 | 2.00 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -0.99 | 0.65 | -1.63 | | Travis Releford | -1.74 | 0.53 | -2.27 | | Conner Teahan | -3.04 | 0.94 | -3.99 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -3.87 | 0.31 | -4.18 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -8.86 | 0.00 | -8.86 | For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Alex Pyle | 6.57 | 1.75 | 4.82 | | Adam Holthaus | 6.09 | 1.40 | 4.69 | | Jordan Stout* | -7.94 | -8.46 | 0.52 | | Doug Moore | -2.61 | -1.52 | -1.09 | | Spencer Allen | -1.81 | 0.86 | -2.67 | | Matt Boswell | 0.60 | 5.74 | -5.13 | | Jeremiah Box | -1.45 | 3.74 | -5.19 | | Robert Moores | -1.87 | 3.75 | -5.62 | | Tim Niles* | -7.04 | 0.34 | -7.38 | | Dustin Burdolski* | -7.94 | 0.00 | -7.94 | | Dustin Andrews | -2.94 | 6.45 | -9.40 | | Lamar Wilbern | -9.74 | 3.83 | -13.58 | | Shang Ping | -12.02 | 2.11 | -14.13 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
|
Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. For the exhibition games, I am estimating team efficiencies. For Kansas, I am using the #24 offensive efficiency and defensive effiency from last season, reflecting KU's AP ranking of #24. For Emporia State, I am using the #300 offensive and defensive efficiencies, reflecting a fairly weak team but leaving room for them to be somewhat decent for their lower division. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Emporia State
| Offensive Performance
| 124.1 | 88.3
| | Defensive Performance | 87.3
| 118.3 | Comments Kansas was clearly superior on both ends of the court. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | Emporia State
| | eFG% | 34.4
| | | TO Rate | 3.2
| | | O-Reb% | 9.0 | | | Freethrows | FT Pct | 0.4
| | | FT Attempts | 2.6
| |
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 68-41% | | TO Rate (lo better) | KU 21-17% | | O-Reb% | KU 44-17%
| | FT Rate | KU 22-19% | Bottom Line
| When KU shot, the shot effectively went in two-thirds of the time. When it didn't, KU got the rebound nearly half of the time. You do the math ... a Four Factors thorough domination from the Jayhawks. | | |