| Home |
| NCAA Basketball |
| Numbers Up |
| FAQ & Terms |
| Newsletter |
| Radio |
| Links |
| Contact |
| |
| Recap: Kansas at Arizona |
|
|
| Dec 25, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For PSAN70-D, lower ratings are better
*Rating not based on enough data.
My Observations
For about 51% of the game, KU showed signs that it could be solid against a decent team on the road, leading 44-35 with 18:57 to go in the game. In the span of 8:44, Arizona was up 64-50. During that stretch, every nightmare came true for fans of the inexperienced, inconsistent Jayhawks. KU fouled the Wildcats seemingly on every trip down the court, gave up a ton of offensive rebounds and even got posterized on an incredible one-handed alleyoop dunk. Basically, KU took a punch to the face and responded by doubling over in pain and crying. No one punched back. There were times when it looked like the Jayhawks really wanted to, but it was such a disorganized, frantic attempt that it never really had a chance.
Player Performance Analysis |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Arizona |
| Offensive Performance | 104.4 | 142.9 |
| Defensive Performance | 103.4 | 90.9 |
Comments As if having an eye-popping 142.9 offensive rating wasn't enough for Arizona, they also had to have a very solid defensive night. Against KU's sub-NCAA-average defense, this was a huge mismatch. KU had only a slightly above average offensive rating. | ||
(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below)
| What did the difference in this statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained | ||
| Statistic Measured | Kansas | Arizona | |
| eFG% | 0.3 | ||
| TO Rate | 4.6 | ||
| O-Reb% | 6.4 | ||
| Freethrows | FT Pct | 3.2 | |
| FT Attempts | 5.8 | ||
Projection | Actual | Comments | |
OVERALL RESULTS | |||
| Final Score | UA 71-70 | UA 84-67 | |
| Tempo (# poss) | 62 | 66 | |
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES | |||
| eFG% | KU 55-54% | UA 48.4-48.2% | Tight, as projected, but neither team shot that well. |
| TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 19% | UA 18-12% | KU did a good job of limiting TO's, but then UA doesn't usually force any. It was huge that KU couldn't force any this game. |
| O-Reb% | KU 39-34% | UA 50-33% | Looks like this could be a problem spot for KU the rest of the season. When your opponent misses, it should never be 50-50 who gets the ball. |
| FT Rate | UA 29-20% | UA 37-25% | No surprises here. |
| Four Factors Overall | With everything so tight, Arizona's projected advantage in FT attempts could be the difference. | Domination across the board. But it was the FTs that ultimately were most influential, as projected, if you include percentage and attempts together. | It is hard to remember the last time KU was beaten in every single factor. |
PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | |||
| Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, Taylor Opp - Budinger, Wise | KU - Collins, Marcus Morris Opp - Hill, Horne | |
| Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact) | KU - Aldrich Opp - Budinger | KU - Markieff Morris (Aldrich #4) Opp - Horne (Budinger #5) | |
| Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency) | KU - Marcus Morris Opp - Johnson | KU - Markieff Morris (Marcus #2) Opp - Horne (Johnson last) | |
| Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Marcus Morris, Reed Opp - Johnson, Fogg | KU - Markieff Morris, Marcus Morris Opp - Horne, Wise | Impressive given Markieff's projected struggles. |
| Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Aldrich, Markieff Morris Opp - Hill, Judkins | KU - Reed, Aldrich Opp - Budinger, Johnson | |
| |