Bulletin
|
Early editions of previews and recaps are often emailed to newsletter subscribers in advance. If you'd like to receive advance copies, click on "Newsletter" above or enter email on menu to the left to sign up. |
|
Recap: Missouri at Kansas (abbreviated and late) |
|
|
|
Feb 18, 2008 |
Kansas 90 - Missouri 71
cPSAN
"Total Impact" RatingsPSAN ratings adjusted for quality of opponent | cPSAN70
"Efficiency" RatingscPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Keon Lawrence
Lowest: Marshall Brown | PLAYER | cPSAN | | Brandon Rush | 5.51 | | Sasha Kaun | 4.53 | | Sherron Collins | 4.35 | | Russell Robinson | 3.76 | | Mario Chalmers | 3.69 | | Darnell Jackson | 2.72 | | Darrell Arthur | 2.18 | | Cole Aldrich | 2.13 | | Jeremy Case* | 0.00 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.00 | | Tyrel Reed* | 0.00 | | Rodrick Stewart | -0.50 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.73 | | PLAYER | cPSAN | | K. Lawrence | 10.65 | | L. Lyons | 2.08 | | V. Volkus | 0.79 | | M. Anderson Jr.* | 0.65 | | J. Horton* | 0.51 | | J.T. Tiller | -0.07 | | D. Carroll | -0.13 | | J. Safford | -0.19 | | M. Lawrence | -0.87 | | M. Brown | -1.78 | | D. Butterfield* | -3.76 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Sasha Kaun
Lowest: Marshall Brown | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | Sasha Kaun | 13.19 | | Sherron Collins | 6.86 | | Cole Aldrich | 6.71 | | Brandon Rush | 6.31 | | Darrell Arthur | 5.88 | | Russell Robinson | 5.08 | | Mario Chalmers | 4.36 | | Darnell Jackson | 3.68 | | Jeremy Case* | 0.00 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.00 | | Tyrel Reed* | 0.00 | | Rodrick Stewart | -1.57 | | Conner Teahan* | -27.61 | | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | K. Lawrence | 11.20 | | M. Anderson Jr.* | 4.12 | | L. Lyons | 3.43 | | V. Volkus | 2.71 | | J. Horton* | 2.40 | | J.T. Tiller | -0.08 | | D. Carroll | -0.20 | | J. Safford | -0.60 | | M. Lawrence | -0.97 | | M. Brown | -6.12 | | D. Butterfield* | -28.43 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
| Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Missouri | Offensive Performance
| 132.9 | 118.1 | | Defensive Performance | 85.4 | 100.4 | Comments KU performed better on both sides of the ball by a wide margin. When MU had the ball, both teams were about equally responsible for MU's efficiency, while it was primarily KU's strong offense that resulted in such great efficiency for the Jayhawk offense. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | Missouri | | eFG% | 7.1
| | | TO Rate | | 6.5
| | O-Reb% | 12.7
| | | Freethrows | FT Pct | 6
| | | FT Attempts | -
| - | Comments The biggest factor for KU was its dominance on the offensive glass, followed by better shooting from the floor. The rare turnover disadvantage for KU was negated by a better percentage at the FT line. |
|
|