|
Recap: Kansas vs UNLV (NCAA Tournament) |
|
|
|
Apr 18, 2008 |
Kansas 75 - UNLV 56
cPSAN
"Total Impact" RatingsPSAN ratings adjusted for quality of opponent | cPSAN70
"Efficiency" RatingscPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Russell Robinson
Lowest: Kendall Wallace | PLAYER | cPSAN | | Russell Robinson | 8.73 | | Mario Chalmers | 6.85 | | Brandon Rush | 3.94 | | Darnell Jackson | 3.68 | | Sherron Collins | 3.11 | | Darrell Arthur | 2.15 | | Sasha Kaun | 0.83 | | Tyrel Reed* | 0.71 | | Conner Teahan* | 0.00 | | Jeremy Case* | 0.00 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.00 | | Cole Aldrich* | -0.30 | | PLAYER | cPSAN | | W. Adams | 7.67 | | R. Rougeau | 3.22 | | J. Darger | 1.36 | | M. Rutledge* | 0.03 | | S. Hoffman* | 0.00 | | T. Cage* | 0.00 | | C. Terry | -0.14 | | M. Shaw | -1.08 | | C. Bailey | -2.35 | | K. Wallace | -2.45 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Russell Robinson
Lowest: Kendall Wallace | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | Tyrel Reed* | 31.95 | | Russell Robinson | 14.46 | | Mario Chalmers | 9.00 | | Darnell Jackson | 6.58 | | Sherron Collins | 5.14 | | Brandon Rush | 4.89 | | Sasha Kaun | 3.71 | | Darrell Arthur | 2.91 | | Conner Teahan* | 0.00 | | Jeremy Case* | 0.00 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.00 | | Cole Aldrich* | -4.40 | | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | W. Adams | 9.02 | | R. Rougeau | 5.15 | | J. Darger | 2.26 | | M. Rutledge* | 0.23 | | S. Hoffman* | 0.00 | | T. Cage* | 0.00 | | C. Terry | -0.16 | | M. Shaw | -3.22 | | C. Bailey | -4.04 | | K. Wallace | -5.76 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
|
Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | UNLV
| Offensive Performance
| 130.4 | 110.0 | | Defensive Performance | 82.3 | 97.3
| Comments Scintillating performance for KU on both ends of the court. UNLV did better than an average team, but against KU, that still results in a lopsided loss. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this
statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained
(not necessarily supposed to add up to final margin) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | UNLV
| | eFG% | 29.2 | | | TO Rate | --
| --
| | O-Reb% | | 4.3 | | Freethrows | FT Pct | | 4.3 | | FT Attempts | | 10.7
|
FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 63-32% | | TO Rate (lo better) | Tie at 16%
| | O-Reb% | UNLV 25-21%
| | FT Rate | UNLV 60-24% | Bottom Line
| A little misleading, as UNLV held its own or handily won three of the four categories. The problem was that the biggest of all, eFG%, was dominated by KU about as well as I've seen in any game.
| |
|