Kansas 71 - Georgia Tech 66 cPSAN "Total Impact" RatingsPSAN ratings adjusted for quality of opponent | cPSAN70 "Efficiency" RatingscPSAN ratings expressed as "per 70 possessions" | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Anthony Morrow Lowest: Zach Peacock | PLAYER | cPSAN | | R. Robinson, G | 4.97 | | B. Rush, G | 4.41 | | S. Kaun, C | 3.47 | | R. Stewart, G | 2.21 | | D. Arthur, F | 1.22 | | M. Chalmers, G | 0.53 | | S. Collins, G | 0.49 | | C. Aldrich, C* | 0.00 | | D. Jackson, F | -0.88 | | PLAYER | cPSAN | | A. Morrow, G | 7.04 | | L. Clinch, G | 5.69 | | M. Causey, G | 2.25 | | D. Bell, G-F | 2.00 | | G. Lawal, F | 0.94 | | M. Miller, G | 0.62 | | A. Aminu, F-C | 0.51 | | L. Storrs, G* | 0.05 | | J. Smith, F | -0.70 | | Z. Peacock, F | -3.81 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Anthony Morrow Lowest: Zach Peacock | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | R. Stewart, G | 6.94 | | B. Rush, G | 6.20 | | R. Robinson, G | 5.96 | | S. Kaun, C | 5.44 | | D. Arthur, F | 2.61 | | S. Collins, G | 0.83 | | M. Chalmers, G | 0.66 | | C. Aldrich, C* | 0.00 | | D. Jackson, F | -1.71 | | PLAYER | cPSAN70 | | A. Morrow, G | 10.53 | | M. Causey, G | 6.47 | | L. Clinch, G | 6.38 | | D. Bell, G-F | 3.23 | | G. Lawal, F | 2.72 | | M. Miller, G | 2.08 | | A. Aminu, F-C | 1.08 | | L. Storrs, G* | 0.51 | | J. Smith, F | -1.35 | | Z. Peacock, F | -5.69 | *Rating not based on enough data. |
| Comments and ObservationsThe officiating made this a painful game to watch. Hard fouls were being allowed, while touch fouls got whistled. It felt as though KU was clearly the better team most of the game, but when Self decided to slow things down on offense (presumably to run out the clock), that's when things got ugly. Taking the air out of the ball, so to speak, also takes the pep out of players' steps. All sense of urgency was gone and replaced with a "hang on for a little while longer" attitude. I hope Self abandons this, but it's been like this many times before, so I'm guessing it will happen again. Despite three consecutive misses late in the game, KU shot 68% from the line to hang on. People may have cursed Russell Robinson for missing both his free throws when he could have iced the game, but he was the biggest reason KU even had a big lead to cushion itself with near the end. Offensive and Defensive Performance
Using the outcome of the game and the adjusted offensive and defensive efficiencies for each team, performance indicates (in PTS per 100 Possessions) how each team would have fared against an average team. That is, KU's offensive performance is how many points per 100 possessions KU would have scored against an average defense. This provides a standard performance we can compare across teams. | (pts per 100 poss) | Kansas | Ga Tech
| Offensive Performance | 99.8
| 125.6
| | Defensive Performance | 86.5
| 88.6
| Comments GT played significantly better offense, while KU played slightly better defense. On both sides of the ball, GT's performance was the deciding factor more than KU's performance. Though GT outplayed KU, it was not enough to overcome the gap in team strength. | Four Factor Analysis(Actual statistics moved to Game Projections table below) What did the difference in this statistic mean to each team? | Scoring Margin Advantage Gained (does not add up to game margin because teams may capitalize better or worse than average on TO's and OREB) | | Statistic Measured | Kansas | Georgia Tech | | eFG% | 7.8
| | | TO Rate | --
| --
| | O-Reb% | | 2.9
| | Freethrows | FT Pct | | 0.2
| | FT Attempts | 6.2
| |
Player Performance Analysis (Brief due to time constraints) Morrow and Clinch put on a show for GT. Clinch was the leading scorer and prolific shooter, but Morrow had the more efficient game. Causey's efficiency is high because he made most of his shots in limited playing time, but the boxscore can't capture how costly his last turnover was when GT was going for the tie with under 10 seconds left. The Kansas ratings were a bit more balanced but with deservedly lower ratings, since GT did outperform KU this game. Robinson had an unexpected offensive explosion, although he missed three consecutive free throws very late that could have iced the game. Rush and Kaun both shot well and each had numerous blocks. Kaun even made 5-of-6 free throws! It was a tough game for team stars, Jackson and Chalmers. Neither got established all that well, and both fouled out. Arthur got in foul trouble, and Collins shot poorly and turned it over. Rodrick Stewart actually had the most efficient game, making both his FG's and grabbing 3 REB in just 13 MIN. Game Projections | | Projection | Actual | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | KU 83-67 | KU 71-66
| | Tempo (# poss)
| 75 | 69 | | FOUR FACTORS(Team with advantage) | | eFG% | KU 57-47% | KU 59-51%
| Lots of good shooting on both sides.
| | TO Rate (lo better) | KU 29-21% | Even 26%
| GT negated an expected KU advantage. | | O-Reb% | KU 33-31% | GT 32-22%
| Really disappointing effort from Jayhawks.
| | FT Rate | KU 46-27% | KU 37-20%
| As expected
| Four Factors Overall
| FT attempts and eFG% drive KU advantage. | An unexpected tie in TO rate and nice boost for GT in OREB% helped balance the eFG% and FTA advantage of Kansas | | | Leading Scorers | KU - Chalmers, Arthur, Collins Opp - Morrow, Clinch | KU - Robinson, Chalmers, Rush, Collins Opp - Clinch, Morrow | Arthur scored a measley 6 PTS.
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS(Minimum 10 mins played) | Highest cPSAN (game impact)
| KU - Chalmers Opp - Morrow | KU - Robinson (Chalmers #6) Opp - Morrow | | Highest cPSAN70 (efficiency)
| KU - Chalmers Opp - Morrow | KU - Stewart (Chalmers #7) Opp - Morrow |
| | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Collins, Chalmers Opp - Miller, Morrow | KU - Stewart, Rush Opp - Clinch, Causey | | | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Rush, Stewart Opp - Causey, Clinch | KU - Jackson, Chalmers Opp - Peacock, Smith | Ouch! The exact group projected to do worse was the group that did best compared to season performance to date. | Pre-Game Keys to Watch For | Keys to Watch For | Metric | Result | Edge (Comments) | | KU's biggest projected scoring differential is due to free throw attempt disparity, something that hasn't been a KU strength most of the season. This may be an area of weakness GT has a chance to address this game. | GT free throw attempts within 5 of KU number
| KU took 9 more FT's | KANSAS | | OREB is expected to be a real battle. If either team can turn this into a significant advantage, it could be a difference maker. | Either team to have at least 7% advantage in OREB%
| GT had 10% edge
| GT - Helped keep things uncomfortably close for KU
| | GT is expected to struggle mightily shooting the 2FG, so it becomes paramount that they make their 3FG's if they are to get any offense. | GT to shoot at least 40% from 3FG
| GT shot 36.8%
| KANSAS
|
| |