Kansas 94 - Winston Salem State 43 PSAN
Game Ratings Who contributed most to this game
without adjusting for how good the opponent was? | cPSAN
Comparative Game Ratings PSAN Game Ratings ... adjusted for quality of opponent | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Julian Wright
Lowest: Brian Fisher | PLAYER | PSAN | | Julian Wright | 7.88 | | Darrell Arthur | 6.76 | | Jeremy Case | 6.39 | | Mario Chalmers | 5.61 | | Brandon Rush | 4.70 | | Darnell Jackson | 4.08 | | Sasha Kaun | 4.02 | | Sherron Collins | 3.72 | | Russell Robinson | 3.67 | | Brady Morningstar | 3.60 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.37 | | Rodrick Stewart | 0.19 | | Brad Witherspoon* | 0.00 | | Brennan Bechard* | 0.00 | | PLAYER | PSAN | | Porter, A* | 0.00 | | McCandies, P* | 0.00 | | Murphy-Long, J* | -0.53 | | Floyd, D | -0.91 | | Carter, N | -2.14 | | Hines, C | -2.80 | | Moore, D | -3.40 | | Durham, J | -5.20 | | Lewis, G | -6.03 | | Wonge, D | -6.26 | | Peake, R | -7.34 | | Wray, L | -7.74 | | Fisher, B | -8.64 | *Rating not based on enough data. | Ratings on the CourtHighest: Julian Wright
Lowest: Brian Fisher | PLAYER | cPSAN | | Julian Wright | 5.30 | | Jeremy Case | 4.64 | | Darrell Arthur | 4.53 | | Mario Chalmers | 3.04 | | Brady Morningstar | 2.32 | | Darnell Jackson | 2.21 | | Sasha Kaun | 1.92 | | Brandon Rush | 1.90 | | Sherron Collins | 1.61 | | Russell Robinson | 1.21 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.37 | | Brad Witherspoon* | 0.00 | | Brennan Bechard* | 0.00 | | Rodrick Stewart | -0.75 | | PLAYER | cPSAN | | Floyd, D | 1.99 | | Porter, A* | 0.00 | | McCandies, P* | 0.00 | | Hines, C | -0.13 | | Carter, N | -0.52 | | Murphy-Long, J* | -0.53 | | Moore, D | -2.24 | | Durham, J | -2.99 | | Wonge, D | -3.82 | | Peake, R | -4.43 | | Lewis, G | -4.52 | | Wray, L | -5.42 | | Fisher, B | -6.21 | *Rating not based on enough data. | My Observations Winston Salem State was simply a televised practice. The important thing to see was whether the Jayhawks would stay focused the whole game, and for the most part they did. Except for a small early run that let WSS back to within two points, Kansas looked energetic, focused, somewhat more crisp, and didn't appear to play down to the level of its competition. Four Factor Analysis - SHOOTING - Huge advantage for KU (63% to 42%)
- OFFENSIVE REBOUNDING - As expected, a dominating performance on the glass for Kansas (37% to 18%)
- TURNOVERS - This could have been one area KU could have struggled, but it took great care of the ball. 14% TO rate for KU, vs 32% for WSS.
- FREETHROW RATE - Almost non-existent for WSS (made 1 of 9 FT's) versus a somewhat subpar FT rate of 18.5% (that's calculated by FTM divided by FGA)
Player Performance Analysis Not worth commenting much here. I will point out that Case and Morningstar's ratings were both pretty good, and they don't usually get much opportunity to play. Nice to see them contribute. |
NCAA Basketball 
