Sports and Numbers

Newsletter

 
Preview: Oakland at Kansas Print E-mail
Nov 25, 2009

Oakland at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)

 KansasOakland

Performance Indicators

  
Record (conference)
3-02-2
AP Rank1
NR
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
17
(not enough data)
184
(not enough data)
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
1
(includes computer rankings with not enoug data)
176
(includes computer rankings with not enoug data)
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)

vs Memphis (#61) W 57-55

@ Tennessee Tech (#309) W 77-56
RPI
(Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .)

Current: 45

Forecast: 2

Current: 188

Forecast: 128

Projected NCAA Tournament Seed
(Latest consensus from The Bracket Matrix)
 #1 Seed
 #14 Seed
(Automatic bid only)

Prediction Models

  
Vegas OddsmakersWin by TBD
Est. Projection: TBD
 
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
 Win by TBD  
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) Win by 23.4  
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)

 Win 78-54
% chance of victory not available

 
 TeamRankings.com

(Use home rating for home team, road for road.  If fewer than 3 games played at corresponding locations, use "predictive" ratings for both teams but use specific home advantage rather than standard average homecourt advantage for all NCAA teams.)

Win by 29.3 
Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location.  NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court)
 Est. Projection: 76-53
93.4% chance of victory
 
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(40% Vegas + 10% Pred Trckr + 10% SagPred + 10% Pom + 10% TmRnkgs + 20% Last 7)

 Win by 24.5
Est. Projection: 77-53

 

 

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season

(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.  For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.  PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency.  The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.)

Kansas

 

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN-O ePSAN-D ePSAN-Comp
Cole Aldrich 6.69 -9.04 15.73
Sherron Collins 9.22 -5.05 14.27
Xavier Henry 9.58 -3.80 13.39
Markieff Morris 7.32 -2.44 9.76
Marcus Morris 5.88 -2.40 8.28
Tyrel Reed 2.68 -2.89 5.57
C.J. Henry 3.20 0.46 2.73
Elijah Johnson 2.84 0.35 2.48
Chase Buford* 1.28 0.24 1.04
Thomas Robinson -3.55 -3.37 -0.19
Conner Teahan -0.98 -0.13 -0.85
Jordan Juenemann* -1.56 0.46 -2.03
Tyshawn Taylor -7.20 -3.12 -4.07

 

 Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN70-O ePSAN70-D ePSAN70-Comp
C.J. Henry 14.62 2.12 12.49
Markieff Morris 7.19 -2.40 9.59
Cole Aldrich 3.45 -4.66 8.11
Xavier Henry 4.88 -1.94 6.82
Sherron Collins 4.30 -2.35 6.65
Chase Buford* 7.09 1.34 5.75
Marcus Morris 3.24 -1.33 4.57
Tyrel Reed 2.12 -2.28 4.40
Elijah Johnson 2.94 0.37 2.57
Thomas Robinson -3.77 -3.57 -0.20
Conner Teahan -2.13 -0.28 -1.85
Tyshawn Taylor -3.76 -1.63 -2.13
Jordan Juenemann* -10.16 3.02 -13.17

 

* Rating not based on enough data.

Oakland

  

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN-O PSAN-D PSAN-Comp
Keith Benson 3.26 -12.51 15.78
Johnathon Jones 1.26 -4.19 5.45
Will Hudson 2.93 -1.08 4.01
Drew Valentine* -0.06 -2.53 2.46
Ilija Milutinovic* 1.56 -0.58 2.14
Jay Thames* -0.13 -0.55 0.42
Drew Maynard -1.34 -0.03 -1.31
John Kast* -1.31 0.00 -1.31
Ledrick Eackles -6.77 -4.00 -2.77
Derick Nelson -4.72 -0.46 -4.27
Blake Cushingberry -3.62 0.77 -4.40
Larry Wright -15.56 3.11 -18.67

 

Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN70-O PSAN70-D PSAN70-Comp
Keith Benson 1.13 -4.35 5.48
Ilija Milutinovic* 3.73 -1.38 5.11
Drew Valentine* -0.09 -3.67 3.57
Will Hudson 1.34 -0.49 1.83
Johnathon Jones 0.37 -1.23 1.59
Jay Thames* -0.38 -1.58 1.21
Drew Maynard -1.13 -0.03 -1.11
Derick Nelson -1.55 -0.15 -1.40
Ledrick Eackles -6.55 -3.87 -2.68
Blake Cushingberry -2.23 0.48 -2.71
Larry Wright -5.75 1.15 -6.90
John Kast* -8.89 0.00 -8.89

 

* Rating not based on enough data.

 

Player Analysis:

(largely in context of ratings above)

 

It is certainly no surprise to most to see Cole Aldrich and Sherron Collins atop any ratings system for Kansas.  After all, they're both preseason All-Americans.  What's surprising so far is that Markieff Morris has better efficiency numbers on the season.  In fact, aside from the poor start from Tyshawn Taylor (last in both impact and efficiency), all of the other KU starters are also the most efficient on the team.  (C.J. Henry's stats technically "count" above, but that's because in his one game he averaged above the 8 min/g I use for the season cumulative stats.  I wouldn't put him in the same category as others just yet.)  Stats would argue that Reed should start over Taylor based solely on this season's numbers, but of course we know it's too early for numbers to tell a lot of the story, and Taylor could turn things around.

 

Aside from Xavier Henry's solid start to the season, the KU freshmen are not looking great right now.  Robinson's really struggling on offense, but his defense has been second best on the team in efficiency.  If he can get some shots to drop, things could change in a hurry this early in the season.

 

Oakland won't turn too many heads on paper.  The only way they're going to make the postseason is an automatic bid.  They have absolutely no quality wins and lost at home to Eastern Michigan (3-2) in the season opener.  But they do return two frontcourt players from last year's team who ranked well in Dean Oliver's Offensive Rating numbers (Keith Benson #14 and Will Hudson #65).  Both are great shooters, rebounders and shot-blockers, although Benson is signficantly better in each of those categories.  In fact, this season Benson's defensive efficiency are almost Aldrich-esque (-4.35 vs Aldrich's -4.66 - remember negative is better on defense).  Alas, when you look at the overall picture, aside from Benson, nobody has had a very good season for Oakland.  Larry Wright is probably the biggest drag so far, but there are a number of others who are on the wrong side of zero on both offense and defense.

 

 

 

Last 7 Game Analysis

 

  Kansas Oakland
Expected Score 75.7 52.9
Win 93.4% 6.6%
Win by 3 or less 3.2% 2.2%
Win by 10 or more 79.1% 1.3%

 

Down to the Wire?

 Margin of game was less than 1 point in 1.7% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis."  Many of these would be "overtime" games.

 

(Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing.  If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas.  In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added.  That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late.  This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense.  Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other.  This analysis will reflect that.  Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency.  Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games.  The results are what you see in the table.)

 

 

Opponent Four Factor Analysis

 

Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date.  Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game:

 

  Oakland Opp Advantage  
eFG% 45.00% 46.29% -6.0  
TO Rate 18.15% 20.33% 6.0  
OREB% 38.99% 29.53% 14.6  
FTA/FGA 32.08% 20.09% 8.8 FT Pct
      22.2 FT Attempts

 

ANALYSIS:  If not for the free throw line, Oakland might be staring at a winless record.  It's mostly their ability to get to the line, but they've also shot somewhat better than their opponents at the stripe.  A close second to FT attempts advantage is OREB%, where they've held a robust 10% advantage over opponents.  It's hard to believe this would hold against KU's frontline, but it is nonetheless a strength that the Jayhawks must be prepared to battle.

 

 

Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) 

 

** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category
Clear Advantage for Kansas No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Oakland
Oakland 3pt FG%**    
Oakland eFG%**    
Oakland PTS/Poss**    
Oakland FT Rate**    
Oakland 2pt FG%**    
Kansas TO rate    
Oakland % own 2FGA's blocked**    
Oakland % Poss STL by Opp**    
Kansas 2pt FG%**    
Kansas eFG%**    
  Kansas OREB  
  Kansas FT Rate  
  Kansas PTS/Poss  
  Kansas 3pt FG%  
  Kansas % Poss STL by Opp  
  Oakland FT%  
  Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Oakland TO rate  
  Kansas FT%  
  Oakland OREB  

 

************************************************************* 

Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Expect average-paced game

 

 

Game Projections

(Not a prediction.  Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.)

Manual adjustments: None.

 


Projected Boxscore

 

Kansas 77                            
Oakland 51                            
                               
Kansas                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
C.J. Henry 8 1 1 1 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole Aldrich 26 4 7 0 0 3 5 11 1 5 6 0 1 0 3
Conner Teahan 8 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Elijah Johnson 11 2 2 0 1 0 0 4 1 1 2 1 2 1 0
Marcus Morris 25 3 5 0 0 3 5 9 0 2 2 2 1 1 1
Markieff Morris 12 2 2 0 0 1 1 5 1 3 4 0 2 1 1
Sherron Collins 29 3 4 2 3 3 3 15 0 3 3 2 2 2 0
Thomas Robinson 11 1 4 0 0 2 5 4 1 4 5 1 1 1 1
Tyrel Reed 17 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 2 2 2 0 0 0
Tyshawn Taylor 26 1 3 0 1 2 4 4 0 2 2 4 4 1 0
Xavier Henry 27 3 5 2 3 5 5 17 1 4 5 1 2 1 0
TOTALS 200 20 34 6 13 19 28 77 5 26 31 13 16 8 6
                               
Oakland                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Blake Cushingberry 18 1 1 1 5 0 0 5 1 1 2 0 1 0 0
Derick Nelson 34 4 13 0 3 1 3 9 4 2 6 2 1 1 0
Drew Maynard 8 2 3 0 2 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
Drew Valentine 6 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0
Ilija Milutinovic 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Johnathon Jones 37 2 7 1 4 2 2 9 0 1 1 4 3 2 0
Keith Benson 32 5 10 0 0 2 2 12 2 4 6 0 2 0 2
Larry Wright 30 2 5 1 6 1 1 8 1 1 2 2 3 0 0
Ledrick Eackles 7 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0
Will Hudson 24 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 2 6 1 2 1 0
TOTALS 200 17 45 3 21 8 12 51 15 13 28 11 16 6 2

 

Projection Summary

 

 
Projection
Comments

 OVERALL RESULTS

 Final Score  KU 77-51  
 Tempo (# poss)
 71 

 FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES

 eFG%  KU 62-33%  Don't be surprised if it really does get this lopsided.
 TO Rate (lo better)  Tie 22%  
 O-Reb% Oak 37-28%
 Early season numbers and adjustments to conform the projection to expected tempo make this unreliable and unbelievable.
 FT Rate KU 60-18%
 Given that this was the single biggest advantage for Oakland coming in, let's see if this materializes (but see note above for OREB%).
 Four Factors Overall
 KU's overwhelming shooting advantage should seal the deal, while FT attempts advantage will put the nails in the coffin.  
 

PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played)

 Leading Scorers

 KU - X. Henry, Collins

 Opp - Benson, Jones/Nelson

 
 Highest PSAN-Comp
(game impact)

 KU - X. Henry

 Opp - Benson

 
 Highest PSAN70-Comp
(efficiency)

 KU - Markieff Morris

 Opp - Benson

 
 Highest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - X. Henry

 Opp - Wright

 Wright probably just because a -7 efficiency is a darn low bar.
 Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Aldrich

 Opp - Jones

 

 

Sports and Numbers Projection

Kansas wins 77-51

(not all prediction models included/complete)

 

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh