Oakland at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)| | Kansas | Oakland
| Performance Indicators
| | | Record (conference)
| 3-0 | 2-2 | | AP Rank | 1
| NR
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 17 (not enough data)
| 184 (not enough data)
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 1 (includes computer rankings with not enoug data)
| 176 (includes computer rankings with not enoug data)
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Memphis (#61) W 57-55 | @ Tennessee Tech (#309) W 77-56 | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 45 Forecast: 2 | Current: 188 Forecast: 128 | Projected NCAA Tournament Seed (Latest consensus from The Bracket Matrix) | #1 Seed
| #14 Seed (Automatic bid only) | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by TBD Est. Projection: TBD | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by TBD | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 23.4 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 78-54 % chance of victory not available | | TeamRankings.com
(Use home rating for home team, road for road. If fewer than 3 games played at corresponding locations, use "predictive" ratings for both teams but use specific home advantage rather than standard average homecourt advantage for all NCAA teams.) | Win by 29.3 | | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court) | Est. Projection: 76-53 93.4% chance of victory | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (40% Vegas + 10% Pred Trckr + 10% SagPred + 10% Pom + 10% TmRnkgs + 20% Last 7) | Win by 24.5 Est. Projection: 77-53 | |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 6.69 | -9.04 | 15.73 | | Sherron Collins | 9.22 | -5.05 | 14.27 | | Xavier Henry | 9.58 | -3.80 | 13.39 | | Markieff Morris | 7.32 | -2.44 | 9.76 | | Marcus Morris | 5.88 | -2.40 | 8.28 | | Tyrel Reed | 2.68 | -2.89 | 5.57 | | C.J. Henry | 3.20 | 0.46 | 2.73 | | Elijah Johnson | 2.84 | 0.35 | 2.48 | | Chase Buford* | 1.28 | 0.24 | 1.04 | | Thomas Robinson | -3.55 | -3.37 | -0.19 | | Conner Teahan | -0.98 | -0.13 | -0.85 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -1.56 | 0.46 | -2.03 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -7.20 | -3.12 | -4.07 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | C.J. Henry | 14.62 | 2.12 | 12.49 | | Markieff Morris | 7.19 | -2.40 | 9.59 | | Cole Aldrich | 3.45 | -4.66 | 8.11 | | Xavier Henry | 4.88 | -1.94 | 6.82 | | Sherron Collins | 4.30 | -2.35 | 6.65 | | Chase Buford* | 7.09 | 1.34 | 5.75 | | Marcus Morris | 3.24 | -1.33 | 4.57 | | Tyrel Reed | 2.12 | -2.28 | 4.40 | | Elijah Johnson | 2.94 | 0.37 | 2.57 | | Thomas Robinson | -3.77 | -3.57 | -0.20 | | Conner Teahan | -2.13 | -0.28 | -1.85 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -3.76 | -1.63 | -2.13 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -10.16 | 3.02 | -13.17 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Oakland
Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Keith Benson | 3.26 | -12.51 | 15.78 | | Johnathon Jones | 1.26 | -4.19 | 5.45 | | Will Hudson | 2.93 | -1.08 | 4.01 | | Drew Valentine* | -0.06 | -2.53 | 2.46 | | Ilija Milutinovic* | 1.56 | -0.58 | 2.14 | | Jay Thames* | -0.13 | -0.55 | 0.42 | | Drew Maynard | -1.34 | -0.03 | -1.31 | | John Kast* | -1.31 | 0.00 | -1.31 | | Ledrick Eackles | -6.77 | -4.00 | -2.77 | | Derick Nelson | -4.72 | -0.46 | -4.27 | | Blake Cushingberry | -3.62 | 0.77 | -4.40 | | Larry Wright | -15.56 | 3.11 | -18.67 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Keith Benson | 1.13 | -4.35 | 5.48 | | Ilija Milutinovic* | 3.73 | -1.38 | 5.11 | | Drew Valentine* | -0.09 | -3.67 | 3.57 | | Will Hudson | 1.34 | -0.49 | 1.83 | | Johnathon Jones | 0.37 | -1.23 | 1.59 | | Jay Thames* | -0.38 | -1.58 | 1.21 | | Drew Maynard | -1.13 | -0.03 | -1.11 | | Derick Nelson | -1.55 | -0.15 | -1.40 | | Ledrick Eackles | -6.55 | -3.87 | -2.68 | | Blake Cushingberry | -2.23 | 0.48 | -2.71 | | Larry Wright | -5.75 | 1.15 | -6.90 | | John Kast* | -8.89 | 0.00 | -8.89 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Player Analysis:(largely in context of ratings above) It is certainly no surprise to most to see Cole Aldrich and Sherron Collins atop any ratings system for Kansas. After all, they're both preseason All-Americans. What's surprising so far is that Markieff Morris has better efficiency numbers on the season. In fact, aside from the poor start from Tyshawn Taylor (last in both impact and efficiency), all of the other KU starters are also the most efficient on the team. (C.J. Henry's stats technically "count" above, but that's because in his one game he averaged above the 8 min/g I use for the season cumulative stats. I wouldn't put him in the same category as others just yet.) Stats would argue that Reed should start over Taylor based solely on this season's numbers, but of course we know it's too early for numbers to tell a lot of the story, and Taylor could turn things around. Aside from Xavier Henry's solid start to the season, the KU freshmen are not looking great right now. Robinson's really struggling on offense, but his defense has been second best on the team in efficiency. If he can get some shots to drop, things could change in a hurry this early in the season. Oakland won't turn too many heads on paper. The only way they're going to make the postseason is an automatic bid. They have absolutely no quality wins and lost at home to Eastern Michigan (3-2) in the season opener. But they do return two frontcourt players from last year's team who ranked well in Dean Oliver's Offensive Rating numbers (Keith Benson #14 and Will Hudson #65). Both are great shooters, rebounders and shot-blockers, although Benson is signficantly better in each of those categories. In fact, this season Benson's defensive efficiency are almost Aldrich-esque (-4.35 vs Aldrich's -4.66 - remember negative is better on defense). Alas, when you look at the overall picture, aside from Benson, nobody has had a very good season for Oakland. Larry Wright is probably the biggest drag so far, but there are a number of others who are on the wrong side of zero on both offense and defense. Last 7 Game Analysis | | Kansas | Oakland | | Expected Score | 75.7 | 52.9 | | Win | 93.4% | 6.6% | | Win by 3 or less | 3.2% | 2.2% | | Win by 10 or more | 79.1% | 1.3% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 1.7% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. (Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games. The results are what you see in the table.) Opponent Four Factor Analysis
Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date. Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game: | | Oakland | Opp | Advantage | | | eFG% | 45.00% | 46.29% | -6.0 | | | TO Rate | 18.15% | 20.33% | 6.0 | | | OREB% | 38.99% | 29.53% | 14.6 | | | FTA/FGA | 32.08% | 20.09% | 8.8 | FT Pct | | | | | 22.2 | FT Attempts | ANALYSIS: If not for the free throw line, Oakland might be staring at a winless record. It's mostly their ability to get to the line, but they've also shot somewhat better than their opponents at the stripe. A close second to FT attempts advantage is OREB%, where they've held a robust 10% advantage over opponents. It's hard to believe this would hold against KU's frontline, but it is nonetheless a strength that the Jayhawks must be prepared to battle. Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Oakland | | Oakland 3pt FG%** | | | | Oakland eFG%** | | | | Oakland PTS/Poss** | | | | Oakland FT Rate** | | | | Oakland 2pt FG%** | | | | Kansas TO rate | | | | Oakland % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | Oakland % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Kansas 2pt FG%** | | | | Kansas eFG%** | | | | | Kansas OREB | | | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss | | | | Kansas 3pt FG% | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp | | | | Oakland FT% | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Oakland TO rate | | | | Kansas FT% | | | | Oakland OREB | | ************************************************************* | Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Expect average-paced game | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) Manual adjustments: None.
Projected Boxscore | Kansas | 77 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Oakland | 51 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | C.J. Henry | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Cole Aldrich | 26 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | | Conner Teahan | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Elijah Johnson | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Marcus Morris | 25 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Markieff Morris | 12 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Sherron Collins | 29 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | Thomas Robinson | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Tyrel Reed | 17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 26 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | | Xavier Henry | 27 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 20 | 34 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 28 | 77 | 5 | 26 | 31 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 6 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Oakland | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Blake Cushingberry | 18 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Derick Nelson | 34 | 4 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Drew Maynard | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Drew Valentine | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Ilija Milutinovic | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Johnathon Jones | 37 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | | Keith Benson | 32 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | Larry Wright | 30 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | | Ledrick Eackles | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Will Hudson | 24 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 17 | 45 | 3 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 51 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 2 | Projection Summary | | Projection | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | KU 77-51 | | Tempo (# poss)
| 71 | | FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 62-33% | Don't be surprised if it really does get this lopsided. | | TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 22% |
| | O-Reb% | Oak 37-28%
| Early season numbers and adjustments to conform the projection to expected tempo make this unreliable and unbelievable. | | FT Rate | KU 60-18%
| Given that this was the single biggest advantage for Oakland coming in, let's see if this materializes (but see note above for OREB%). | Four Factors Overall
| KU's overwhelming shooting advantage should seal the deal, while FT attempts advantage will put the nails in the coffin. |
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | | Leading Scorers | KU - X. Henry, Collins Opp - Benson, Jones/Nelson | | Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact)
| KU - X. Henry Opp - Benson | | Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency)
| KU - Markieff Morris Opp - Benson | | | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - X. Henry Opp - Wright | Wright probably just because a -7 efficiency is a darn low bar. | | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Aldrich Opp - Jones | |
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 77-51(not all prediction models included/complete) |
|