Kansas State at Kansas (Lawrence, KS) | | Kansas | Kansas State
| | Performance Indicators
| | | Record (conference)
| 27-2 (13-1) | 24-4 (11-3)
| | AP Rank | 2
| 5
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 2
| 6
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 1
| 5
| RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 1 Forecast: 1 | Current: 5 Forecast: 5 | Projected NCAA Tournament Seed (Latest consensus from The Bracket Matrix) | #1 Seed
| #2 Seed
| | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by 8.5 Est. Projection: 79-71 | | Adjusted Vegas Line (NEW!) (Uses info from VegasExperts.com on line actions. Historical accuracy of line actions for both teams is taken into account to move the line or the over/under in the same/opposite direction as the action. Magnitude of movement depends upon historical accuracy level.)
| Win by 8.6 Est. Projection: 80-74 | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by 7.95 | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 7.78 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 79-71 78% chance of victory | | TeamRankings.com (Use home rating for home team, road for road. If fewer than 3 games played at corresponding locations, use "predictive" ratings for both teams but use specific home advantage rather than standard average homecourt advantage for all NCAA teams.) | Win by 1.3 | | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court) | | Est. Projection: 79-76 56% chance of victory
| Similar Opponent (Examines offensive performance against similar defensive teams and defensive performance against similar offensive teams. Threshold for similarity set at efficiencies of 5 pts/100 possessions above or below that of opponent in this game. If necessary, threshold adjusted to find a minimum of three games to analyze for offense and defense.) | Est. Projection: 85-81 59% chance of victory | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (30% Veg + 10% AdjVL + 10% PrTrk + 10% Sag + 10% KP + 10% TmRk + 10% L7 + 10% SimOp) | Win by 6.0 Est. Projection: 80-74
| |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 73.68 | -104.28 | 177.96 | | Marcus Morris | 85.69 | -28.21 | 113.90 | | Xavier Henry | 52.03 | -36.30 | 88.33 | | Markieff Morris | 33.85 | -26.84 | 60.69 | | Sherron Collins | 47.72 | -12.96 | 60.67 | | Brady Morningstar | 35.11 | -20.55 | 55.66 | | Tyrel Reed | 35.53 | -18.93 | 54.46 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 26.98 | -12.72 | 39.70 | | Jeff Withey* | 3.19 | -8.29 | 11.48 | | Elijah Johnson* | 6.89 | -3.78 | 10.67 | | C.J. Henry* | 9.87 | -0.53 | 10.39 | | Thomas Robinson* | -2.73 | -12.16 | 9.43 | | Conner Teahan* | -1.01 | -2.66 | 1.65 | | Chase Buford* | -0.14 | -0.38 | 0.24 | | Jordan Juenemann* | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.13 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 3.81 | -5.39 | 9.20 | | Jeff Withey* | 2.55 | -6.64 | 9.19 | | C.J. Henry* | 6.99 | -0.37 | 7.36 | | Marcus Morris | 4.73 | -1.56 | 6.28 | | Markieff Morris | 2.84 | -2.25 | 5.09 | | Tyrel Reed | 3.28 | -1.75 | 5.03 | | Xavier Henry | 2.63 | -1.83 | 4.46 | | Brady Morningstar | 2.59 | -1.51 | 4.10 | | Elijah Johnson* | 2.48 | -1.36 | 3.84 | | Sherron Collins | 1.99 | -0.54 | 2.53 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 1.69 | -0.80 | 2.49 | | Thomas Robinson* | -0.59 | -2.65 | 2.05 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.76 | -2.00 | 1.24 | | Chase Buford* | -0.31 | -0.85 | 0.54 | | Jordan Juenemann* | 0.53 | 0.94 | -0.41 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Kansas State Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Jacob Pullen | 78.13 | -36.38 | 114.51 | | Curtis Kelly | 45.24 | -62.58 | 107.81 | | Jamar Samuels | 43.56 | -36.42 | 79.98 | | Dominique Sutton | 41.06 | -34.57 | 75.63 | | Denis Clemente | 49.65 | -18.50 | 68.16 | | Rodney McGruder | 33.77 | -17.05 | 50.82 | | Jordan Henriquez-Roberts | 3.14 | -15.29 | 18.43 | | Luis Colon | 3.14 | -11.59 | 14.74 | | Martavious Irving | 0.74 | -8.39 | 9.13 | | Victor Ojeleye* | 4.65 | -2.69 | 7.34 | | Chris Merriewether* | -2.08 | -6.18 | 4.10 | | Wally Judge | -2.35 | -6.17 | 3.82 | | Nick Russell* | -6.88 | -3.99 | -2.90 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Curtis Kelly | 2.64 | -3.65 | 6.29 | | Rodney McGruder | 4.16 | -2.10 | 6.26 | | Jacob Pullen | 3.57 | -1.66 | 5.23 | | Jamar Samuels | 2.71 | -2.27 | 4.98 | | Dominique Sutton | 2.52 | -2.12 | 4.64 | | Jordan Henriquez-Roberts | 0.50 | -2.45 | 2.95 | | Denis Clemente | 2.09 | -0.78 | 2.87 | | Victor Ojeleye* | 1.46 | -0.84 | 2.30 | | Luis Colon | 0.44 | -1.63 | 2.08 | | Martavious Irving | 0.11 | -1.28 | 1.40 | | Chris Merriewether* | -0.36 | -1.06 | 0.71 | | Wally Judge | -0.32 | -0.83 | 0.51 | | Nick Russell* | -2.21 | -1.28 | -0.93 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Last 7 Game Projection | | Kansas | Kansas St. | | Expected Score | 75.9 | 78.7 | | Win | 43.8% | 56.2% | | Win by 3 or less | 6.9% | 6.8% | | Win by 10 or more | 23.3% | 33.9% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 4.5% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. (Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games. The results are what you see in the table.) Similar Opponent Projection | | Kansas | Kansas St. | | Expected Score | 84.9 | 81.7 | | Win | 59.1% | 41.0% | | Win by 3 or less | 7.3% | 6.9% | | Win by 10 or more | 35.1% | 20.9% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 4.7% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. (Methodology of Similar Opponent Analysis: Here, we look at games against opponents with similar offensive and defensive profiles to the opponent of interest to see how the teams are performing. For Kansas, we would look at its offensive performances against teams that have a defense that is within 5 pts/100 possessions efficiency above or below that of the opponent in this game. If this does not result in at least three appropriate comparisons, the threshold will be adjusted until it finds three. If there are more than three that are within the original threshold, all of those will be used. The same is done for defense but using offensive profiles of opponents. The analysis splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games. The results are what you see in the table.) Season Performance TrendsThe charts below show the trend for each team's performance this season. For each game, a team's offensive, defensive and overall performance is standardized. Thus, performance indicates how many points per 100 possessions a team would score (offense), yield (defense) or net (average of offense and inverse defense) for a game. It is based purely on its opponent's adjusted efficiencies and the resulting efficiency of the game played. The dotted lines represent the best-fit line (linear regression), indicating which way a team may be trending for the season overall.
ANALYSIS: The trends clearly favor KSU. Kansas has a flat offensive trendline with a clearly worsening defensive trend. The Wildcats have a flat offensive trend as well, but their defense is sloping the right direction. In fact, the overall trendline for K-State puts them at a higher rating coming into this game than Kansas, but the homecourt edge would offset that enough to make it essentially a toss-up. Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for K-State | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | Kansas OREB** | | | | K-State % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | K-State FT% | | | | K-State % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | | K-State 2pt FG% | | | | Kansas 3pt FG% | | | | K-State TO rate | | | | K-State eFG% | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp | | | | Kansas eFG% | | | | Kansas 2pt FG% | | | | K-State PTS/Poss | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss | | | | Kansas FT% | | | | Kansas TO rate | | | | K-State FT Rate | | | | K-State 3pt FG% | | | | | K-State OREB** | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked** | ************************************************************* | Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | K-State will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Expect uptempo game | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) Manual adjustments: None.
Projected Boxscore | Kansas | 81 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas St. | 74 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Brady Morningstar | 24 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cole Aldrich | 27 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | | Marcus Morris | 26 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Markieff Morris | 17 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Sherron Collins | 34 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Thomas Robinson | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | Tyrel Reed | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 23 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Xavier Henry | 28 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 19 | 39 | 7 | 17 | 22 | 31 | 81 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas St. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Chris Merriewether | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Curtis Kelly | 28 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Denis Clemente | 39 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Dominique Sutton | 27 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Jacob Pullen | 36 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | | Jamar Samuels | 28 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Luis Colon | 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Martavious Irving | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Rodney McGruder | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Wally Judge | 8 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | | TOTALS | 200 | 17 | 40 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 28 | 74 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 4 | Projection Summary | | Projection | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | KU 81-74 | | Tempo (# poss)
| 73 | | FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 53-47% | | | TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 23% |
| | O-Reb% | KSU 39-38%
| | | FT Rate | KU 55-47%
| | Four Factors Overall
| KU's better shooting and more trips to the charity stripe should provide the margin of victory on Senior Night. |
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | | Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, X. Henry Opp - Pullen, Clemente | | Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact)
| KU - Aldrich Opp - Pullen | | Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency)
| KU - Aldrich Opp - Kelly | | | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Taylor, Aldrich Opp - Samuels | | | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Reed, Collins Opp - Sutton, Colon | I'm not buyin' that Collins flubs his last time out in AFH. |
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 81-74(all prediction models included/complete) |
|