Temple at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)| | Kansas | Temple
| Performance Indicators
| | | | Record | 7-2
| 5-3
| | AP Rank | NR (34th most votes in AP)
| NR (43rd most votes in AP)
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 15 | 57
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 55
| 38
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Washington (#38) W 73-54 | vs Tennessee (#20) W 88-72 | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 138 Forecast: 17 | Current: 11 Forecast: 34 | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by 10.5 Est. Projection: 74-64 | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by 10.3 | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 11.0 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 72-60 89% chance of victory | | TeamRankings.com (Use home rating for home team, road for road, use specific home advantage for home team) | | Win by 5.7 | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court!) | Est. Projection: 75-67 69.9% chance of victory | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (40% Vegas + 10% Pred Trckr + 10% SagPred + 10% Pom + 10% TmRnkgs.com +10% Last 7) | Win by 8.6 Est. Projection: 73-65 | |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 30.50 | -28.49 | 58.99 | | Sherron Collins | 12.37 | -10.59 | 22.96 | | Brady Morningstar | 7.79 | -9.15 | 16.94 | | Marcus Morris | 6.51 | -10.36 | 16.87 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 1.96 | -12.49 | 14.46 | | Tyrel Reed | 3.21 | -8.90 | 12.11 | | Markieff Morris | 0.91 | -8.70 | 9.61 | | Quintrell Thomas | 2.87 | -4.31 | 7.18 | | Travis Releford* | 4.10 | -1.93 | 6.03 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.05 | -2.97 | 2.92 | | Chase Buford* | 2.33 | 0.53 | 1.80 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.66 | 0.92 | -0.26 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -1.11 | 0.37 | -1.48 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -1.05 | 0.87 | -1.93 | | Brennan Bechard* | -1.98 | 0.15 | -2.13 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | Chase Buford* | 17.76 | 4.04 | 13.72 | | Cole Aldrich | 4.90 | -4.58 | 9.49 | | Travis Releford* | 2.67 | -1.25 | 3.92 | | Marcus Morris | 1.48 | -2.36 | 3.85 | | Quintrell Thomas | 1.53 | -2.30 | 3.83 | | Sherron Collins | 1.60 | -1.37 | 2.97 | | Brady Morningstar | 1.26 | -1.48 | 2.75 | | Markieff Morris | 0.23 | -2.20 | 2.43 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 0.31 | -1.99 | 2.30 | | Tyrel Reed | 0.60 | -1.67 | 2.27 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.03 | -1.99 | 1.96 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 1.54 | 2.15 | -0.62 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -1.91 | 1.59 | -3.50 | | Brennan Bechard* | -10.68 | 0.80 | -11.48 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -10.22 | 3.38 | -13.60 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Temple
Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Dionte Christmas | 22.39 | -8.59 | 30.97 | | Lavoy Allen | 12.87 | -6.34 | 19.21 | | Ryan Brooks | 17.91 | 0.45 | 17.46 | | Semaj Inge | 8.06 | -2.63 | 10.68 | | Sergio Olmos | 5.72 | -4.06 | 9.78 | | Scootie Randall* | 4.70 | -0.16 | 4.85 | | Micheal Eric* | -1.40 | -5.30 | 3.89 | | Luis Guzman | -0.01 | -2.20 | 2.19 | | Ramone Moore | 0.94 | 0.43 | 0.51 | | Rafael DeLeon* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | Craig Williams* | -3.33 | 0.47 | -3.80 | | T.J. DiLeo* | -6.41 | -0.88 | -5.53 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Scootie Randall* | 5.38 | -0.18 | 5.56 | | Dionte Christmas | 3.26 | -1.25 | 4.51 | | Lavoy Allen | 2.68 | -1.32 | 4.00 | | Sergio Olmos | 2.03 | -1.44 | 3.48 | | Ryan Brooks | 2.75 | 0.07 | 2.68 | | Micheal Eric* | -0.78 | -2.95 | 2.17 | | Semaj Inge | 1.39 | -0.45 | 1.84 | | Luis Guzman | 0.00 | -0.44 | 0.43 | | Ramone Moore | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.16 | | Rafael DeLeon* | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | | T.J. DiLeo* | -7.77 | -1.07 | -6.70 | | Craig Williams* | -13.73 | 1.93 | -15.66 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Player Analysis:
(largely in context of ratings above) Cole Aldrich stands head and shoulders above the rest of the players this game. But Temple's top two players in efficiency are better on paper than anyone other than Aldrich for KU so far this season. Five days before his own personal holiday, Dionte Christmas will try to snap KU's 29-game home winning streak with the help of Lavoy Allen and Ryan Brooks, primarily. The thing to remember about Dionte Christmas is that he takes a TON of his team's shots and uses more of their possessions than anyone else, and he still manages to shoot nearly 59 eFG%. Probably the one thing holding back his offensive efficiency numbers is his utter lack of offensive rebounding. Of course, it's hard to grab your own offensive rebounds when you're a wing taking plenty of jumpers. That's probably the primary factor, as evidenced by his tenacious defensive rebounding skills (17% of available DREB). While KU's Aldrich is an outlier (in a good way), the rest of KU's team is quite balanced in terms of efficiency. None of them are tearing it up, but no one is stinking it up either. The lowest-rated player is Tyrel Reed, who still clocks in at 2.27 (vs NCAA average player of zero). Still, it must trouble KU fans that so much of the contributions (impact) are coming from players who are rated much lower on the efficiency chart. Taylor and Reed, for example, are playing lots of minutes but somewhat inefficiently. It's a young team, so it is hard to say anything definitive just yet other than "the Jayhawks are struggling" for now. Last 7 Game Analysis Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 5,000 games. The results are what you see below. | | Kansas | Temple | | Expected Score | 75.42 | 67.20 | | Win | 69.9% | 30.1% | | Win by 3 or less | 6.9% | 6.7% | | Win by 10 or more | 45.6% | 11.6% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 4.7% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. Opponent Four Factor Analysis
Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date. Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game: | | Temple | Opp | Advantage | | | eFG% | 51.38% | 48.68% | 25.0 | | | TO Rate | 20.79% | 19.32% | -8.2 | | | OREB% | 31.87% | 32.48% | -1.7 | | | FT Rate | 18.26% | 22.25% | 3.5 | FT Pct
| | | | | -18.5 | FT Attempts
| ANALYSIS: It's a good thing the Owls are shooting so well compared to their opponents, otherwise they would really be struggling. Opponents are really doing a number on Temple at the FT line, where they are attempting about 20% more FT's than the Owls each game. But it's the eFG% advantage, particularly the 50.3 vs 45.3% on 2FG's that is driving Temple's winning record so far. Highlighted Efficiency Rankings Note: There are 344 Div-I teams (Source: KenPom.com) | Kansas | Temple
| Offense #36 - Defense #18 - Tempo #182 Strong defensive eFG% (#28), particularly 2FG% defense (#11) Excellent offensive rebounding (#10) Great job on defense of BLK (#26) and STL (#48) Very few 3FGA as % of FGA (#262) Very high % of FG's assisted (#46)
Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: C Short: None Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)
Sherron Collins - #192 AST rate Cole Aldrich - #42 OREB%, #42 DREB%, #36 BLK% Marcus Morris - #36 OREB% Markieff Morris - #171 BLK%
| Offense #49 - Defense #90 - Tempo #249 Don't force many turnovers (#265) Pitiful use of the FT line (#308 FT Rate) Allow high 3FG% (#257) Rarely get own 2FG's blocked (#27)
Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: PG, SG, C Short: PF Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)
Dionte Christmas - #197 eFG% Lavoy Allen - #155 OREB%
| Scoring Distribution: On offense, KU relies less than average on 3FG's, while its opponents get an extremely low percentage of points from 2FG's. On offense, TU gets an extremely low percentage of points from FT's, while its opponents rely heavily on 3FG's. |
Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Temple | | Temple % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Temple FT Rate | | | | Kansas TO rate | | | | | Kansas 3pt FG% | | | Kansas OREB** | | | | | Kansas FT% | | | | Kansas eFG% | | | | Temple 2pt FG% | | | | Temple eFG% | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss | | | | Temple OREB | | | | Temple TO rate | | | | Kansas 2pt FG% | | | | Temple PTS/Poss | | | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | Temple FT% | | | | Temple % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Temple 3pt FG% | | ************************************************************* | Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Temple will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Expect slow-paced game | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) No manual adjustments to projections were made for this game
Projected Boxscore | Kansas | 75 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Temple | 69 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Brady Morningstar | 30 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cole Aldrich | 30 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | Conner Teahan | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Marcus Morris | 14 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Markieff Morris | 13 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | Quintrell Thomas | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Sherron Collins | 37 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | Travis Releford | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Tyrel Reed | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Tyrone Appleton | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 30 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 18 | 37 | 6 | 17 | 21 | 29 | 75 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Temple | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Dionte Christmas | 36 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Ryan Brooks | 34 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Semaj Inge | 30 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | Lavoy Allen | 29 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Ramone Moore | 10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Sergio Olmos | 29 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | | Luis Guzman | 26 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Micheal Eric | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 16 | 37 | 8 | 19 | 13 | 18 | 69 | 12 | 20 | 32 | 18 | 13 | 7 | 4 | Projection Summary | | Projection | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | KU 75-69 | | Tempo (# poss)
| 66 | | FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | Tie 50% | Given KU's strong eFG% defense, this is surprising. Likely a compensation for other factors that are projected to be in greater favor for KU, but the overall score margin still needing to be close.
| | TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 20% | | | O-Reb% | KU 39-36%
| Interesting battle to watch here.
| | FT Rate | KU 39-23%
| Projection shows this to be the cause of game-set-match for KU. | Four Factors Overall
| More tight than some might want to believe, but in the end, it will be KU's ability to get to the FT line much more often that will seal the victory. Still, it is interesting that Temple's offensive performance rating is projected to be so high (125.4). |
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | | Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, Aldrich/Taylor Opp - Christmas, Brooks | | Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact)
| KU - Aldrich Opp - Allen | | Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency)
| KU - Marcus Morris Opp - Moore | | | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Marcus Morris, Reed Opp - Moore, Allen | | | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Collins, Aldrich Opp - Olmos | Not usually a recipe for success for KU.
|
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 75-69(includes all prediction models) | |