Nebraska at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)| | Kansas | Nebraska
| Performance Indicators
| | | Record (conference)
| 21-5 (10-1) | 16-8 (6-5) | | AP Rank | 15
| NR
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 11
| 64
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 12
| 66
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Washington (#20) W 73-54 home and away vs Kansas St. (#36) | vs Missouri (#8) W 56-51 vs Texas (#28) W 58-55 | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 8 Forecast: 8 | Current: 67 Forecast: 68 | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by 12.0 Est. Projection: 69-57 | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by 12.9 | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 11.7 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 67-56 89% chance of victory | | TeamRankings.com
(Use home rating for home team, road for road. If fewer than 3 games played at corresponding locations, use "predictive" ratings for both teams but use specific home advantage rather than standard average homecourt advantage for all NCAA teams.) | Win by 16.5
| | AccuScore Game Forecast
(Models how players and coaches have individually responded to similar conditions. Games are then simulated play-by-play over 10,000 times.) | Win by 12.8 Est. Projection: 73-60 85% chance of victory | | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court) | Win by 14.4 Est. Projection: 67-53 83% chance of victory | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (40% Vegas + 8% Pred Trckr + 8% SagPred + 8% Pom + 8 % TmRnkgs + 8% Accu + 20% Last 7) | Win by 12.9 Est. Projection: 69-56 | |
Last 7 Game Analysis | | Kansas | Nebraska | | Expected Score | 67.4 | 53.0 | | Win | 83.1% | 16.9% | | Win by 3 or less | 5.7% | 4.6% | | Win by 10 or more | 61.3% | 5.3% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 3.3% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. (Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games. The results are what you see in the table.) Highlighted Efficiency Rankings Note: There are 344 Div-I teams (Source: KenPom.com) | Kansas | Nebraska
| Offense #28 - Defense #11 - Tempo #96 Usually win the all-important eFG% battle (#16 eFG%, #10 opp eFG%) Terrible ball handling (#252 TO%) Particularly good at controlling 2FG% (#27 own, #8 opp) Control offensive rebounding on both sides (#37 own, #48 limit opp) Excellent perimeter shooting (#33 in 3FG%) Money from the FT line (#37 in FT%) Great job on defense of BLK (#28) Allow opp high % of FG's assisted (#263) Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: C Short: SF Effective Height: #36
Other Factors: Team is #335 in experience Team is #270 in Bench Minutes Unusually high/low % of points scored by positions: Hi - PG ... Lo - SG, SF Individual Player Highlights: (thru Feb 15)
Sherron Collins - #126 AST rate Brady Morningstar - #61 eFG% Cole Aldrich - #54 eFG%, #155 OREB%, #13 DREB%, #36 BLK% Marcus Morris - #27 OREB%, #110 STL%, #147 PF's drawn/40 min
| Offense #149 - Defense #17 - Tempo #305 Win the ballhandling game with ease (#48 limit own TO%, #2 forcing opp TO%) Anemic offensive rebounding (#338) Rarely block opp 2FGA's (#263 BLK%) STL% advantage on both sides (#49 limit own, #5 STL% on def) Opp take very high % of FG's from behind arc (#312 in limiting opp)
Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: None Short: All positions in bottom 20 Effective Height: #344 (LOWEST IN NATION!) Other Factors: Unusually high/low % of points scored by positions: Hi - None ... Lo - None Individual Player Highlights: (thru Feb 15)
Steve Harley - #145 TO Rate (lo), #173 STL% Cookie Miller - #160 AST Rate, #149 STL% Ade Dagunduro - #191 FT Rate, #150 STL% Paul Velander - #32 TO Rate (lo) Ryan Anderson - #93 STL%
| Scoring Distribution: On offense, KU relies somewhat less on 3FG's, while its opponents rely unusually low on 2FG's. On offense, NU relies much more on 3FG's than 2FG's, while its opponents have the same profile. |
Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Nebraska | | Nebraska OREB** | | | | Kansas FT%** | | | | Nebraska % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | Nebraska 2pt FG%** | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Nebraska PTS/Poss** | | | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | Kansas eFG%** | | | | Kansas 2pt FG%** | | | | | Nebraska eFG% | | | Kansas 3pt FG%** | | | | | Kansas OREB | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss | | | | Nebraska 3pt FG% | | | | | Nebraska % Poss STL by Opp** | | | Nebraska FT% | | | | Nebraska FT Rate | | | | | Nebraska TO rate** | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Kansas TO rate** | ************************************************************* | Nebraska will take above avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Nebraska will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Kansas plays faster tempo than Nebraska | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) Manual adjustments: None.
Projected Boxscore | Kansas | 66 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nebraska | 51 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Brady Morningstar | 32 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Cole Aldrich | 31 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | | Marcus Morris | 19 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Mario Little | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Markieff Morris | 16 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | Sherron Collins | 36 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | | Travis Releford | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Tyrel Reed | 23 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 27 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 16 | 29 | 6 | 15 | 16 | 22 | 66 | 8 | 23 | 31 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nebraska | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Ade Dagunduro | 27 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | Brandon Richardson | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cookie Miller | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | | Paul Velander | 26 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Ryan Anderson | 27 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Sek Henry | 28 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Steve Harley | 33 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | Toney McCray | 18 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | TOTALS | 200 | 11 | 29 | 5 | 16 | 14 | 20 | 51 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 2 | Projection Summary | | Projection | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | KU 66-51 | | Tempo (# poss)
| 65 | | FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 57-41% | | | TO Rate (lo better) | NU 29-23% | Get ready for another turnover festival from the Jayhawks. Should be interesting to see if NU actually does have this high a TO% of its own though. | | O-Reb% | KU 33-15%
| Combined with 41 eFG%, you can see why NU is only projected to score 51.
| | FT Rate | KU 50-44%
| | Four Factors Overall
| The extreme advantage in eFG% overshadows all, as KU should coast to victory on that alone. |
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | | Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, Aldrich Opp - Dagunduro, Harley | | Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact)
| KU - Aldrich Opp - Anderson | | Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency)
| KU - Little Opp - McCray | | | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Little, Morningstar Opp - None | Unusual not to have any players expected to play better than usual.
| | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Reed, Marcus Morris Opp - Richardson, Dagunduro | Reed is only KU player expected to have a significantly worse game than usual. But with his game, one more made 3FG could be the difference. |
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 66-51(all prediction models included/complete) |
Pre-Game Keys to Watch For | Keys to Watch For | Metric | Result | Edge (Comments) | For Nebraska, this game is all about turnovers. In particular, it's their ability to steal the ball from KU. If that's not an area they are really controlling, they don't stand a chance. Projections have them already forcing a high rate of turnovers, but if they want to win, they'll have to push even harder.
| NU to force at least 30% TO Rate and have at least 10 STL. | | | | We know Nebraska won't get offensive rebounds, so if they are held to a poor eFG%, that should be game-set-match for the Jayhawks. | KU to limit NU to 45 eFG% or lower | | |
|