Kent State at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)| | Kansas | Kent State
| Performance Indicators
| | | | Record | 4-1 (Home: 4-0)
| 3-2 (Road: 1-0)
| | AP Rank | #22 | NR
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 8 (Teams still not well connected) | 85 (Teams still not well connected)
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 16 (last week)
| 41 (last week)
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Washington (#58) W 73-54 | @ St. Louis (#129) W 76-74 (OT) | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 68 Forecast: 8 | Current: 116 Forecast: 74 | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by 13.0 Est. Projection: 74-61 | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by 13.8 | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 10.9 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 75-57 (Not listed - calculated from ratings) (Not listed) % chance of victory | | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court!) | Est. Projection: 74-58 85.8% chance of victory (Includes only 5 gms for each team) | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (30% Vegas + 20% Prediction Tracker + 15% Sagarin + 15% Pomeroy + 20% Last 7) | Win by 13.8 Est. Projection: 74-60 | |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 20.45 | -17.72 | 38.17 | | Brady Morningstar | 9.59 | -7.92 | 17.52 | | Sherron Collins | 9.71 | -5.15 | 14.86 | | Marcus Morris | 6.58 | -7.33 | 13.91 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 7.18 | -4.48 | 11.66 | | Markieff Morris | 0.13 | -6.93 | 7.06 | | Tyrel Reed | -1.01 | -5.23 | 4.22 | | Travis Releford | 1.03 | -1.11 | 2.14 | | Chase Buford* | 1.63 | -0.02 | 1.65 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -0.14 | -0.03 | -0.11 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -0.04 | 0.35 | -0.39 | | Conner Teahan* | -2.10 | -1.11 | -0.99 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -1.21 | 0.40 | -1.61 | | Quintrell Thomas* | -4.87 | -2.79 | -2.08 | | Brennan Bechard* | -2.07 | 0.16 | -2.23 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | Chase Buford* | 21.33 | -0.25 | 21.58 | | Cole Aldrich | 5.85 | -5.07 | 10.92 | | Marcus Morris | 2.53 | -2.82 | 5.34 | | Brady Morningstar | 2.65 | -2.19 | 4.85 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 2.30 | -1.43 | 3.73 | | Sherron Collins | 2.30 | -1.22 | 3.53 | | Markieff Morris | 0.05 | -2.91 | 2.96 | | Travis Releford | 0.93 | -1.00 | 1.93 | | Tyrel Reed | -0.35 | -1.79 | 1.45 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -0.37 | -0.08 | -0.29 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -0.15 | 1.27 | -1.42 | | Conner Teahan* | -3.59 | -1.90 | -1.69 | | Quintrell Thomas* | -5.20 | -2.98 | -2.22 | | Brennan Bechard* | -20.25 | 1.57 | -21.82 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -23.23 | 7.68 | -30.91 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Kent State
Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Al Fisher | 13.29 | -3.14 | 16.44 | | Brandon Parks | 4.91 | -4.30 | 9.21 | | Anthony Simpson | -1.13 | -9.11 | 7.98 | | Julian Sullinger | 7.62 | 1.98 | 5.64 | | Justin Greene | 2.43 | -2.53 | 4.96 | | Mike McKee | 4.64 | 1.23 | 3.41 | | Alex Grimsley* | 3.32 | 0.00 | 3.32 | | Frank Henry-Ala* | -0.07 | -1.14 | 1.07 | | Jordan Mincy | 2.05 | 2.75 | -0.70 | | Antonio DiMaria* | -2.31 | -0.79 | -1.52 | | Rashad Woods* | -0.30 | 1.80 | -2.10 | | Chris Singletary | -4.18 | 0.18 | -4.36 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Alex Grimsley* | 8.86 | 0.00 | 8.86 | | Justin Greene | 2.81 | -2.92 | 5.73 | | Al Fisher | 3.38 | -0.80 | 4.18 | | Brandon Parks | 1.93 | -1.69 | 3.61 | | Anthony Simpson | -0.44 | -3.54 | 3.10 | | Frank Henry-Ala* | -0.14 | -2.33 | 2.19 | | Julian Sullinger | 2.41 | 0.63 | 1.78 | | Mike McKee | 1.87 | 0.50 | 1.37 | | Jordan Mincy | 0.61 | 0.82 | -0.21 | | Chris Singletary | -1.18 | 0.05 | -1.23 | | Rashad Woods* | -0.30 | 1.79 | -2.08 | | Antonio DiMaria* | -9.87 | -3.37 | -6.50 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Player Analysis:
(largely in context of ratings above) Statistically speaking, this is definitely Cole Aldrich's team. Whether Brady Morningstar will continue to be a positive contributor depends on how he does against the meat of the schedule. Kent State is actually not a very weak opponent based on data so far, so this will actually be a nice test for Morningstar. Sherron Collins needs to get back on track on both ends of the court statistically, if the numbers are to begin conforming to what most people believe subjectively -- that Collins is the leader of this team. Just a few quick notes on Kent State's players. While KU has one player with the most overall impact on offense and defense (Aldrich), that is not so with KSU. It's clear that Al Fisher has led the way on offense, while Anthony Simpson has dominated the bulk of contributions on defense. Interestingly enough, it is Justin Greene who's been the most efficient overall, but he just hasn't played enough minutes to make his overall impact at the level of guys like Parks and Sullinger. Last 7 Game Analysis Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 5,000 games. The results are what you see below. | | Kansas | Kent State | | Expected Score | 73.63 | 58.60 | | Win | 86.7% | 13.2% | | Win by 3 or less | 5.2% | 4.1% | | Win by 10 or more | 64.1% | 3.0% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 3.2% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. Opponent Four Factor Analysis
Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date. Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game: | | Kent St | Opp | Advantage | | | eFG% | 52.94% | 48.02% | 27.5 | | | TO Rate | 13.08% | 28.77% | 55.1 | | | OREB% | 25.99% | 38.10% | -20.1 | | | FT Rate | 16.99% | 32.81% | -18.9 | FT Pct | | | | | -12.1 | FT Attempts
| ANALYSIS: It is clear where KSU had derived its greatest advantage -- turnovers. They force more than twice as many turnovers as they commit. Combined with a small eFG% advantage (the most important of the Four Factors, followed by TO Rate), they have managed their winning record thus far. The free throw line has not been kind in any way, where KSU's FT% is #325 in the country (out of 344), but they are not even taking as many as their opponents. Highlighted Efficiency Rankings Note: There are 344 Div-I teams (Source: KenPom.com) | Kansas | Kent State
| | Not provided this game | Not provided this game
| Scoring Distribution: On offense, KU relies heavily on 2FG's at the expense of 3FG's, while its opponents do the exact opposite. On offense, SU is fairly balanced, while its opponents rely mostly on 2FG's and hardly score much from the FT line. |
Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Kent State | | Kent State FT% | | | | Kansas OREB** | | | | Kansas 2pt FG%** | | | | Kent State FT Rate | | | | Kent State OREB | | | | Kent State % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | | Kansas FT% | | | Kansas PTS/Poss** | | | | | Kansas eFG% | | | | Kent State 3pt FG% | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Kent State PTS/Poss | | | | Kent State eFG% | | | | Kent State 2pt FG% | | | | Kent State % Poss STL by Opp | | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Kansas TO rate** | | | | Kansas 3pt FG%** | | | | Kent State TO rate** | ************************************************************* | Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Expect average-paced game | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) No manual adjustments to projections were made for this game Projected Boxscore Too early to project boxscores from current data.
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 74-60(using "Weighted Models" - still not a projected game) | |