Kansas vs Syracuse (Kansas City, MO)| | Kansas | Syracuse
| Performance Indicators
| | | | Record | 3-0 (Non-Home: 1-0)
| 3-1 (Non-Home: 1-0)
| | AP Rank | #22 | NR (27th most votes)
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 8 (Too early to be meaningful) | 45 (Too early to be meaningful)
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 16
| 29
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Washington (#78) W 73-54 | vs Florida (#51) W 89-83 | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 20 Forecast: 3 | Current: 6 Forecast: 23 | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | Win by 3.5 Est. Projection: 78-74 | | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | Win by 6.7 | | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 7.8
| | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 78-65 (Not listed - calculated from ratings) (Not listed) % chance of victory | | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court!) | Win by 10.4 73.0% chance of victory (Includes only 3 gms for KU, 4 gms for SU) | | Weighted Average of All Models Above (30% Vegas + 20% Prediction Tracker + 15% Sagarin + 15% Pomeroy + 20% Last 7) | Win by 6.0 Est. Projection: 77-71 | |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 10.03 | -12.08 | 22.10 | | Sherron Collins | 9.47 | -6.40 | 15.87 | | Markieff Morris | -0.93 | -9.09 | 8.16 | | Tyrel Reed | 0.07 | -6.41 | 6.48 | | Brady Morningstar | -1.84 | -8.07 | 6.23 | | Marcus Morris | 0.75 | -5.35 | 6.11 | | Travis Releford | 1.58 | -2.38 | 3.97 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -1.46 | -5.08 | 3.62 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.14 | -1.35 | 1.22 | | Chase Buford* | 0.53 | -0.02 | 0.55 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -0.27 | 0.08 | -0.35 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -0.04 | 0.37 | -0.41 | | Brennan Bechard* | -1.19 | 0.00 | -1.19 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -1.26 | 0.42 | -1.68 | | Quintrell Thomas | -4.80 | -2.79 | -2.01 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 5.45 | -6.56 | 12.01 | | Chase Buford* | 9.82 | -0.37 | 10.19 | | Sherron Collins | 3.86 | -2.61 | 6.46 | | Marcus Morris | 0.62 | -4.39 | 5.01 | | Travis Releford | 1.97 | -2.97 | 4.94 | | Markieff Morris | -0.55 | -5.41 | 4.86 | | Tyrel Reed | 0.04 | -3.52 | 3.56 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.34 | -3.43 | 3.08 | | Brady Morningstar | -0.83 | -3.65 | 2.82 | | Tyshawn Taylor | -0.92 | -3.20 | 2.28 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -1.12 | 0.34 | -1.45 | | Matt Kleinmann* | -0.20 | 1.72 | -1.92 | | Quintrell Thomas | -6.21 | -3.61 | -2.60 | | Brennan Bechard* | -14.55 | 0.00 | -14.55 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -23.23 | 7.68 | -30.91 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Syracuse
Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Arinze Onuaku | 18.16 | -2.67 | 20.82 | | Jonny Flynn | 20.01 | 4.13 | 15.89 | | Paul Harris | 9.76 | -3.64 | 13.41 | | Kris Joseph | 8.38 | -3.44 | 11.82 | | Rick Jackson | 2.10 | -7.24 | 9.34 | | Kristof Ongenaet | 4.38 | -2.43 | 6.80 | | Mookie Jones* | 2.76 | -0.46 | 3.23 | | Andy Rautins | 2.15 | -0.49 | 2.64 | | Brandon Reese* | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.83 | | Jake Presutti* | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.07 | | Sean Williams* | -0.36 | -0.08 | -0.28 | | Eric Devendorf | 0.02 | 6.03 | -6.01 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Arinze Onuaku | 6.30 | -0.93 | 7.23 | | Mookie Jones* | 5.81 | -0.98 | 6.79 | | Rick Jackson | 1.37 | -4.73 | 6.10 | | Kris Joseph | 4.02 | -1.65 | 5.66 | | Brandon Reese* | 5.25 | 0.00 | 5.25 | | Jonny Flynn | 5.57 | 1.15 | 4.42 | | Paul Harris | 3.16 | -1.18 | 4.34 | | Kristof Ongenaet | 2.72 | -1.51 | 4.22 | | Andy Rautins | 0.85 | -0.19 | 1.04 | | Jake Presutti* | -1.27 | 0.00 | -1.27 | | Eric Devendorf | 0.01 | 2.00 | -2.00 | | Sean Williams* | -3.38 | -0.74 | -2.64 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Player Analysis:
(largely in context of ratings above) It was clear that Aldrich and Collins would be the anchors for Kansas this season, but most people are probably surprised to see how much devastation Aldrich is causing opponents inside the paint. He is nearly twice as efficient as Collins overall, with a nearly equal impact on both ends of the floor. The Morris brothers have also been a clear positive for the Jayhawks, with Markieff's greater playing time contributing to his greater contribution thus far. Marcus has been the more efficient of the two, though, and the only one with the positive offensive rating. While Brady Morningstar has not been an offensive contributor very much, his defensive ratings have helped to make him a slightly positive contributor. Meanwhile, Travis Releford has been a solid contributor in games, so the reason for his lack of playing time must have something to do with his contributions between games. The speedy Tyshawn Taylor makes most of his impact on defense for now, until he can learn how to avoid charging fouls. Syracuse has more balance than the Jayhawks so far this season. Onuaku (junior forward) and Joseph (freshman forward) are the players with a strong mix of efficiency and overall impact. Flynn and Harris have had great impact but at a somewhat lower efficiency level. None of the Orangemen display the kind of balance on offense and defense that Aldrich and Collins bring to the court for Kansas. Flynn, for example, has a spectacular offensive rating but actually has a worse than zero defensive rating (positive ratings are bad on defense). Last 7 Game Analysis Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 5,000 games. The results are what you see below. | | Kansas | Syracuse | | Expected Score | 76.37 | 65.82 | | Win | 73.6% | 26.3% | | Win by 3 or less | 5.6% | 5.9% | | Win by 10 or more | 51.5% | 10.1% | Margin of game was less than 1 point in 3.7% of games. Highlighted Efficiency Rankings Note: There are 344 Div-I teams (Source: KenPom.com) | Kansas | Syracuse | | Not provided this game | Not provided this game
| Scoring Distribution: On offense, KU relies heavily on 2FG's at the expense of 3FG's, while its opponents do the exact opposite. On offense, SU is fairly balanced, while its opponents rely mostly on 2FG's and hardly score much from the FT line. |
Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Syracuse | | Syracuse % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Kansas TO rate | | | | Kansas 2pt FG%** | | | | Syracuse FT% | | | | Syracuse % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp | | | | Syracuse TO rate | | | | | Kansas eFG% | | | | Syracuse 3pt FG% | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss | | | | Syracuse PTS/Poss | | | | Syracuse eFG% | | | | Syracuse 2pt FG% | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Kansas OREB | | | | Kansas FT Rate | | | | Syracuse FT Rate | | | | | Kansas FT%** | | | | Syracuse OREB** | | | | Kansas 3pt FG% | ************************************************************* | Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Syracuse will take above avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Syracuse plays faster tempo than Kansas | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) No manual adjustments to projections were made for this game Projected Boxscore Too early to project boxscores from current data.
Sports and Numbers ProjectionKansas wins 77-71(includes limited models) | |