Sports and Numbers

 
Preview: Kansas State at Kansas Print E-mail
Jan 13, 2009

Kansas State at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)

 KansasKansas State

Performance Indicators

  
Record (conference)
11-4 (0-0)11-4 (0-1)
AP RankNR
NR
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
24
20
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
39
53
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)

vs Washington (#25) W 73-54
vs Tennessee (#27) W 92-85

@ Cleveland St. (#40) W 69-59
RPI
(Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .)

Current: 42

Forecast: 26

Current: 112

Forecast: 57

Prediction Models

  
Vegas OddsmakersWin by 6.0
Est. Projection: 74-68
 
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
 Win by 4.1  
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) Win by 6.6  
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)

 Win 71-68
62% chance of victory

 
 TeamRankings.com

(Use home rating for home team, road for road.  If fewer than 3 games played at corresponding locations, use "predictive" ratings for both teams but use specific home advantage rather than standard average homecourt advantage for all NCAA teams.)

Win by 22.9
 
  AccuScore Game Forecast

(Models how players and coaches have individually responded to similar conditions. Games are then simulated play-by-play over 10,000 times.)

 Win by 12.1
Est. Projection: 80-68
83% chance of victory
 
Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location.  NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court)
 Est. Projection: 75-71
61% chance of victory
 
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(40% Vegas + 8% Pred Trckr + 8% SagPred + 8% Pom + 8 % TmRnkgs + 8% Accu + 20% Last 7)

 Win by 7.1
Est. Projection: 75-68

 

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season

(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.  For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.  PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency.  The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.)

Kansas

 

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN-O ePSAN-D ePSAN-Comp
Cole Aldrich 52.74 -46.51 99.25
Brady Morningstar 26.54 -7.57 34.11
Sherron Collins 18.43 -8.03 26.46
Marcus Morris 10.78 -14.18 24.95
Tyrel Reed 16.33 -3.29 19.62
Markieff Morris 8.19 -10.64 18.83
Tyshawn Taylor 8.04 -8.17 16.20
Quintrell Thomas* 3.83 -5.77 9.61
Travis Releford 4.08 -4.82 8.90
Matt Kleinmann* 1.03 -0.58 1.60
Chase Buford* 1.09 0.18 0.91
Tyrone Appleton* -0.51 0.17 -0.67
Jordan Juenemann* -0.96 0.32 -1.28
Mario Little* -1.82 -0.12 -1.70
Conner Teahan* -4.70 -2.68 -2.02
Brennan Bechard* -2.67 0.19 -2.87

 

 Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN70-O ePSAN70-D ePSAN70-Comp
Cole Aldrich 4.90 -4.32 9.22
Chase Buford* 5.49 0.91 4.59
Quintrell Thomas* 1.52 -2.29 3.81
Marcus Morris 1.52 -2.00 3.53
Brady Morningstar 2.49 -0.71 3.21
Markieff Morris 1.23 -1.60 2.84
Travis Releford 1.24 -1.46 2.70
Tyrel Reed 1.97 -0.40 2.37
Matt Kleinmann* 1.51 -0.84 2.35
Sherron Collins 1.42 -0.62 2.04
Tyshawn Taylor 0.81 -0.82 1.63
Tyrone Appleton* -0.81 0.27 -1.08
Conner Teahan* -2.95 -1.68 -1.27
Mario Little* -2.52 -0.16 -2.35
Brennan Bechard* -10.82 0.79 -11.61
Jordan Juenemann* -10.04 3.32 -13.36

 

* Rating not based on enough data.

Kansas State

  

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN-O PSAN-D PSAN-Comp
Jamar Samuels 25.86 -20.28 46.14
Ron Anderson 13.88 -23.56 37.44
Dominique Sutton 8.43 -27.16 35.59
Darren Kent 9.11 -18.11 27.22
Luis Colon 18.84 -7.21 26.05
Jacob Pullen -1.78 -23.93 22.15
Denis Clemente 9.85 -9.81 19.66
Fred Brown 10.47 -4.77 15.24
Buchi Awaji 4.05 -4.66 8.72
Abdul Herrera* 1.19 -2.17 3.36
Victor Ojeleye* -1.19 -2.81 1.62
Justin Werner* -2.78 -2.15 -0.63
Chris Merriewether -7.43 -2.95 -4.48

 

 

 

Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN70-O PSAN70-D PSAN70-Comp
Abdul Herrera* 2.63 -4.81 7.44
Jamar Samuels 3.48 -2.73 6.21
Ron Anderson 1.88 -3.18 5.06
Dominique Sutton 1.00 -3.23 4.24
Luis Colon 2.77 -1.06 3.83
Darren Kent 1.19 -2.36 3.55
Buchi Awaji 1.29 -1.49 2.78
Denis Clemente 1.11 -1.10 2.21
Jacob Pullen -0.17 -2.25 2.08
Fred Brown 1.40 -0.64 2.03
Victor Ojeleye* -0.95 -2.24 1.29
Justin Werner* -1.61 -1.24 -0.36
Chris Merriewether -1.89 -0.75 -1.14

 

* Rating not based on enough data.




Player Analysis:

(largely in context of ratings above)

 

This is abbreviated, because I just don't have enough time today, sorry ...

 

Looking at the ratings above, it looks like KSU has much more balance, and indeed, they have one of the highest utilizations of bench minutes in the country.  While Pullen and Clemente are the leading scorers, they are nowhere near the top of the impact or efficiency charts.  Instead, it has been the play of Jamar Samuels and Ron Anderson that has stood out most statistically.  Both players shoot just under 60 eFG% and rebound well on both sides of the court as well as maintain a healthy AST:TO ratio.  Samuels adds BLK to his arsenal as well, while Anderson's greater DREB prowess contributes to his defensive rating.  Dominique Sutton rebounds well for his height and is excellent at swiping the ball, which contributes to his defensive rating.  Pullen and Clemente aren't as high on the chart because they aren't do all that much other than scoring.  Pullen turns it over nearly as often as he dishes assists.  Neither is shooting all that well nor rebounding much.

 

 

 

Last 7 Game Analysis

 

  Kansas Kansas St.
Expected Score 75.3 71.0
Win 60.6% 39.4%
Win by 3 or less 6.5% 6.7%
Win by 10 or more 36.5% 19.2%

 

Down to the Wire?

 Margin of game was less than 1 point in 4.4% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis."  Many of these would be "overtime" games.

 

(Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing.  If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas.  In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added.  That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late.  This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense.  Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other.  This analysis will reflect that.  Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency.  Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 8,000 games.  The results are what you see in the table.)

 

Opponent Four Factor Analysis

 

Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date.  Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game:

 

  Kansas St.
Opp Advantage  
eFG% 50.77% 42.80% 134.8  
TO Rate 19.65% 27.15% 79.1  
OREB% 43.67% 31.84% 66.2  
FT Rate 28.96% 32.01% -23.1 FT Pct
      39.1 FT Attempts

 

ANALYSIS:  If only KSU was hitting its freethrows, it would be winning handily in every single category.  Still, the Wildcats' ability to get to the charity stripe so much more often has netted them about a point per game over opponents.  The bulk of KSU's advantage comes from shutting down its opponents' eFG%, forcing TO's and getting lots of second chance opportunities.  Of those, it's the shooting disparity that reigns supreme though.

 

Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
Note: There are 344 Div-I teams
(Source: KenPom.com)

Kansas

Kansas State

Offense #24 - Defense #38 - Tempo #138
Great shooting defense (#35 in opp eFG%)
Particularly good at controlling 2FG% (#43 own, #14 opp)
Great offensive rebounding (#29)
Great job on defense of BLK (#30)
Allow opp high % of FG's assisted (#257) but also have a high % themselves (#20)

Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse)
Tall: C
Short: None

 

Other Factors:

Rank #35 in Effective Height
Team is #333 in experience
Unusually high/low % of points scored by positions:  Hi - PG ... Lo - SG, SF


Individual Player Highlights: (thru Jan 11)

Sherron Collins - #116 AST rate
Brady Morningstar - #116 eFG%
Cole Aldrich - #61 eFG%, #94 OREB%, #28 DREB%, #25 BLK%, #184 fouls drawn/40 min
Marcus Morris - #39 OREB%

Offense #56 - Defense #10 - Tempo #82
Terrific eFG% defense (#13 overall, #23 on 2FG%, #30 on 3FG%)
Force a ton of TO's (#12)
2nd best OREB% in nation, but strangely not strong at limiting opp OREB%
KSU games result in a ton of FT's by both sides (#17 own FT Rate, #329 limit opp FT Rate)
Struggle at making FT (#277 FT%)
Avoid getting own shots blocked (#18)

 

Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse)
Tall: None
Short: SF

 

Other Factors:

Team is #250 in experience
Extremely deep (#28 in bench minutes)
Unusually high/low % of points scored by positions:  Hi - PG ... Lo - SF


Individual Player Highlights: (thru Jan 11)

Jacob Pullen - #190 STL%
Darren Kent - #25 OREB%, #53 fouls drawn/40 min
Jamar Samuels - #49 TO Rate (lo), #121 BLK%, #21 fouls drawn/40 min
Dominique Sutton - #107 STL%
Ron Anderson - #51 OREB%, #116 fouls drawn/40 min
Luis Colon - #80 OREB%, #70 TO Rate (lo)

Scoring Distribution:

On offense, KU relies less than average on 3FG's, while its opponents get a higher percentage of points from 3FG'sat the expense of 2FG's and much higher than average from FT's.
On offense, KSU relies somewhat less on 2FG's and more on FT's, while its opponents rely unusually heavily on FT's.

 

 

Game Projections

(Not a prediction.  Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.)

Manual adjustments: Mario Little minutes played reflects his gradual return to the lineup.  Automatic projection did not have him playing any minutes at all.

 


Projected Boxscore

 

Kansas 77                            
Kansas St. 69                            
                               
Kansas                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Brady Morningstar 30 1 2 1 3 2 2 7 1 2 3 2 1 1 0
Cole Aldrich 30 4 6 0 0 7 8 15 3 7 10 1 2 1 3
Marcus Morris 14 2 5 0 0 2 4 6 2 3 5 1 2 1 1
Mario Little 10 0 1 0 0 2 3 2 1 3 4 2 2 0 0
Markieff Morris 13 1 3 0 1 3 4 5 2 3 5 1 2 1 1
Quintrell Thomas 7 1 1 0 0 2 3 4 1 2 3 0 1 0 0
Sherron Collins 37 3 7 2 5 6 8 18 1 2 3 4 4 2 0
Travis Releford 6 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
Tyrel Reed 24 1 1 1 4 2 3 7 0 1 1 1 1 1 0
Tyshawn Taylor 29 2 4 1 2 3 4 10 0 2 2 3 2 2 0
TOTALS 200 16 32 5 15 30 41 77 12 26 38 15 17 9 5
                               
Kansas St.                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Chris Merriewether 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
Darren Kent 27 2 5 0 1 5 7 9 3 3 6 1 3 1 0
Denis Clemente 34 2 6 2 4 3 3 13 1 1 2 2 2 1 0
Dominique Sutton 30 2 5 0 1 3 4 7 2 3 5 1 2 1 0
Fred Brown 16 1 3 2 5 1 2 9 1 1 2 1 2 0 0
Jacob Pullen 38 2 5 2 6 4 5 14 1 2 3 2 4 1 0
Jamar Samuels 16 2 5 0 0 4 8 8 2 2 4 1 1 1 1
Luis Colon 14 1 2 0 0 2 3 4 2 2 4 1 0 0 1
Ron Anderson 16 1 3 0 0 3 6 5 3 3 6 1 1 1 0
TOTALS 200 13 35 6 17 25 39 69 15 18 33 10 16 6 2

 

 

Projection Summary

 

 
Projection
Comments

 OVERALL RESULTS

 Final Score  KU 77-69  
 Tempo (# poss)
 70 
 

PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played)

 Leading Scorers

 KU - Collins, Aldrich

 Opp - Pullen, Clemente

 
 Highest PSAN-Comp
(game impact)

 KU - Aldrich

 Opp - Colon

 
 Highest PSAN70-Comp
(efficiency)

 KU - Aldrich

 Opp - Colon

 
 Highest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Little, Aldrich

 Opp - Colon, Anderson

 
 Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Reed, Morningstar

 Opp - Sutton, Pullen

 

 

Sports and Numbers Projection

Kansas wins 77-69

(all prediction models included/complete)

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh