Sports and Numbers

Newsletter

 
Preview: Kansas at Arizona Print E-mail
Dec 22, 2008

Kansas at Arizona (Tucson, AZ)

 KansasArizona

Performance Indicators

  
Record8-2
7-3
AP RankNR
(36th most votes in AP)
NR
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
12 54
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
37
55
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)

vs Washington (#27) W 73-54

vs Gonzaga (#1) W 69-64
RPI
(Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .)

Current: 93

Forecast: 11

Current: 80

Forecast: 59

Prediction Models

  
Vegas Oddsmakers  Win by 2.0
Est. Projection: 71-69
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
 Win by 0.8 
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor)Win by 1.5 
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)

Win 70-66
68% chance of victory

 
 TeamRankings.com
(Use home rating for home team, road for road, use specific home advantage for home team)
 Win by 11.1
Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location.  NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court)
  Est. Projection: 70.7-70.6
50.7% chance of victory
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(40% Vegas + 10% Pred Trckr + 10% SagPred + 10% Pom + 10% TmRnkgs.com +10% Last 7)

 

 Win by 1.5
Est. Projection: 70-69

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season

(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact.  For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better.  PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency.  The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.)

Kansas

 

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN-O ePSAN-D ePSAN-Comp
Cole Aldrich 35.65 -30.83 66.48
Sherron Collins 14.05 -11.14 25.19
Tyshawn Taylor 8.13 -15.88 24.01
Brady Morningstar 12.81 -9.55 22.36
Marcus Morris 5.83 -13.05 18.88
Markieff Morris 3.80 -8.42 12.23
Tyrel Reed -0.02 -8.81 8.79
Travis Releford* 4.00 -1.25 5.25
Quintrell Thomas* 1.18 -3.69 4.87
Conner Teahan* -0.17 -3.05 2.88
Chase Buford* 2.28 0.52 1.76
Matt Kleinmann* 0.07 -0.28 0.36
Jordan Juenemann* -1.09 0.36 -1.45
Tyrone Appleton* -1.03 0.86 -1.89
Brennan Bechard* -1.94 0.15 -2.09

 

 Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER ePSAN70-O ePSAN70-D ePSAN70-Comp
Chase Buford* 17.77 4.05 13.72
Cole Aldrich 5.24 -4.53 9.78
Marcus Morris 1.17 -2.62 3.79
Tyshawn Taylor 1.13 -2.22 3.35
Brady Morningstar 1.89 -1.41 3.30
Travis Releford* 2.40 -0.75 3.15
Sherron Collins 1.64 -1.30 2.95
Markieff Morris 0.88 -1.96 2.84
Quintrell Thomas* 0.58 -1.82 2.40
Conner Teahan* -0.12 -2.10 1.98
Tyrel Reed 0.00 -1.56 1.56
Matt Kleinmann* 0.14 -0.53 0.67
Tyrone Appleton* -1.92 1.59 -3.51
Brennan Bechard* -10.67 0.80 -11.47
Jordan Juenemann* -10.20 3.37 -13.56

 

* Rating not based on enough data.

Arizona

  

Impact Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN-O PSAN-D PSAN-Comp
Jordan Hill 28.14 -26.64 54.78
Chase Budinger 27.37 -10.60 37.97
Zane Johnson 12.84 0.28 12.56
Kyle Fogg 12.21 2.60 9.61
Brendon Lavender* 2.58 -0.72 3.31
Nic Wise 0.20 -1.01 1.21
Jamelle Horne -1.38 -1.43 0.04
D.J. Shumpert* -1.26 -0.98 -0.28
David Bagga* -0.81 -0.33 -0.48
Alex Jacobson* -0.23 0.72 -0.95
Fendi Onobun -4.32 1.48 -5.80
Garland Judkins -8.63 5.34 -13.97

 

 

 

Efficiency Ratings

 

PLAYER PSAN70-O PSAN70-D PSAN70-Comp
Jordan Hill 4.06 -3.84 7.90
Zane Johnson 5.64 0.12 5.52
Chase Budinger 3.65 -1.41 5.06
Brendon Lavender* 3.14 -0.88 4.02
Kyle Fogg 3.37 0.72 2.65
Nic Wise 0.03 -0.14 0.17
Jamelle Horne -0.21 -0.22 0.01
Alex Jacobson* -0.17 0.53 -0.70
D.J. Shumpert* -7.46 -5.81 -1.65
Fendi Onobun -1.81 0.62 -2.43
Garland Judkins -2.69 1.67 -4.36
David Bagga* -7.67 -3.10 -4.57

 

* Rating not based on enough data.




Player Analysis:

(largely in context of ratings above)

 

Kansas faces one of its toughest tests of the season, particularly in the form of Arizona's frontcourt duo of Jordan Hill and Chase Budinger.  In last season's loss at Allen Fieldhouse, Budinger did more than any player on the court for either team with 27 PTS, 6 REB and 2 STL on 56.5 eFG% but also 5 TO's.  Hill happened to have one of his worst games of the season that night, something Jayhawk fans should not expect to be the case this time around.  The junior, Hill, is averaging an astounding 18.5 PTS/gm and nearly 12 REB/gm.  Keep in mind that Arizona's adjusted tempo rating is #300 in the nation, so he is averaging even more if you adjust for that.  Hill is shooting just under 60 eFG%, while Budinger is shooting a red-hot 64 eFG% (unbelievably 58% from 3FG).

 

As good as Hill and Budinger have been, there isn't all that much balance on this Arizona team, with only Zane Johnson and Kyle Fogg contributing much else positively.  Neither of those two plays more than 18 MIN/gm.  Both are shooting a high percentage from the field, with Johnson shooting 8-of-16 from behind the arc.  He doesn't play many minutes, but Kyle Fogg is rated #1 in the country in "Individual Offensive Rating" using Dean Oliver's formula (according to KenPom.com).  Since he does not use that many of the team's possessions, it doesn't turn out to mean much in terms of Fogg's overall impact, but I thought it worthy to mention.

 

Somewhat unusual for a major conference team that has a winning record is that two players are rated at a significantly negative efficiency rating despite playing 12+ minutes each.  Fendi Onobun and Garland Judkins have hurt the team more than any other player statistically speaking.  Both are shooting in the neighborhood of 40 eFG%.  Since Arizona has a great offense but very mediocre defense, none of the players get a very good defensive rating.  And these two struggle so much on offense that they get none of the credit for UA's offensive prowess.

 

On KU's side, it continues to be a team led by Cole Aldrich in terms of production.  But the MVP continues to be Sherron Collins.  This game presents the Kansas freshmen with their first road test, and it could mean a significant departure (negatively) from their averages.

 

 

Last 7 Game Analysis

 

  Kansas Arizona
Expected Score 70.59 70.74
Win 49.3% 50.7%
Win by 3 or less 9.2% 9.2%
Win by 10 or more 21.6% 22.4%

 

Down to the Wire?

 Margin of game was less than 1 point in 6.0% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis."  Many of these would be "overtime" games.

 

(Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing.  If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas.  In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added.  That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late.  This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense.  Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other.  This analysis will reflect that.  Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency.  Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 5,000 games.  The results are what you see below.)

 

Opponent Four Factor Analysis

 

Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date.  Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game:

 

  Arizona Opp Advantage  
eFG% 55.75% 47.72% 88.4  
TO Rate 20.19% 17.67% -17.1  
OREB% 34.78% 33.43% 4.4  
FT Rate 25.66% 15.24% 0.7 FT Pct
      48.3 FT Attempts

 

ANALYSIS:  The only area the Wildcats have struggled is in turnovers.  Otherwise, they're shooting it well from the field and attempting many more FT's than their opponents.  They don't get to the line an unusually high amount.  It's just that they are one of the absolute best at limiting opponents from getting there.  Although the rebounding has been tight on average, Arizona has been more consistent on the offensive rebounding side than on the defensive side.

 

Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
Note: There are 344 Div-I teams
(Source: KenPom.com)

Kansas

Arizona

Offense #28 - Defense #17 - Tempo #185
Strong defensive eFG% (#32), particularly 2FG% defense (#9) but also 3FG% defense (#50)
Excellent offensive rebounding (#15) and limiting opp OREB% (#48)
Great job on defense of BLK (#24) and STL (#46)
Very few 3FGA as % of FGA (#264)
Allow opp high % of FG's assisted (#256)

Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse)
Tall: C
Short: None

 

Other Factors:

Team is #332 in experience


Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)

Sherron Collins - #192 AST rate
Cole Aldrich - #42 OREB%, #42 DREB%, #36 BLK%
Marcus Morris - #36 OREB%
Markieff Morris - #171 BLK%

Offense #13 - Defense #160 - Tempo #300
Great shooting (#14 eFG%, #2 in 3FG%)
Don't force turnovers (#322)
Excellent at limiting opp use of FT line (#6 opp FT Rate)
Block well on defense (#47) but rarely STL (#265)
Remarkably low % of FG attempts are 3FG's (#332) but opposite is true for opponents (#313 lowest %)

 

Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse)
Tall: SF
Short: PG


Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)

Chase Budinger - #44 eFG%
Nic Wise - #159 AST rate
Jordan Hill - #127 eFG%, #9 OREB%, #25 DREB%, #30 BLK%

Scoring Distribution:

On offense, KU relies less than average on 3FG's, while its opponents get an extremely low percentage of points from 2FG's.
On offense, UA gets an above average percentage of points from 2FG's, while its opponents rely heavily on 3FG's and hardly at all on FT's.

 

Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) 

 

** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category
Clear Advantage for Kansas No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Arizona
Kansas FT%    
Kansas TO rate    
Kansas PTS/Poss**    
Kansas % Poss STL by Opp    
Kansas OREB**    
Arizona % Poss STL by Opp**    
Kansas 2pt FG%**    
  Arizona % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Kansas eFG%  
  Arizona 2pt FG%  
  Arizona TO rate  
  Arizona OREB  
  Kansas 3pt FG%  
  Arizona PTS/Poss  
  Arizona eFG%  
  Arizona FT Rate  
  Arizona FT%  
    Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked**
    Kansas FT Rate**
    Arizona 3pt FG%**

 

************************************************************* 

Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted
Arizona will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Arizona will have above avg % of FG's assisted
Expect slow-paced game

 

 

 

Game Projections

(Not a prediction.  Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.)

Manual adjustments: Minutes played for Arizona's Budinger and Wise (to avoid playing over 40 minutes as dictated by system automatically increasing better players' minutes in tighter games).

 


Projected Boxscore

 

Kansas 70                            
Arizona 71                            
                               
Kansas                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Brady Morningstar 31 1 2 2 3 1 1 9 1 1 2 2 1 1 0
Cole Aldrich 31 4 8 0 0 2 3 10 3 6 9 2 2 1 2
Conner Teahan 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Marcus Morris 13 3 6 0 0 1 2 7 2 3 5 1 1 1 1
Markieff Morris 12 1 3 0 1 1 2 3 2 3 5 1 2 0 1
Quintrell Thomas 6 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 3 0 1 0 0
Sherron Collins 38 4 8 2 6 2 2 16 1 1 2 5 2 1 0
Travis Releford 6 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Tyrel Reed 26 1 1 2 4 1 1 9 0 2 2 2 1 1 0
Tyshawn Taylor 32 3 5 1 3 2 2 11 0 2 2 5 2 2 0
TOTALS 200 19 36 7 18 11 15 70 11 21 32 18 12 7 4
                               
Arizona                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Chase Budinger 40 4 9 4 6 3 4 23 2 4 6 3 3 1 1
Fendi Onobun 9 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
Garland Judkins 14 1 3 0 1 1 2 3 1 0 1 2 1 0 0
Jamelle Horne 36 2 5 0 1 1 1 5 2 2 4 2 2 1 0
Jordan Hill 39 5 11 0 0 5 7 15 5 6 11 2 3 1 2
Kyle Fogg 12 1 2 0 0 2 2 4 1 1 2 1 0 0 0
Nic Wise 40 2 6 3 5 3 3 16 0 2 2 5 3 1 0
Zane Johnson 10 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 0
TOTALS 200 16 37 8 15 15 20 71 11 17 28 17 12 5 3

 

 

Projection Summary

 

 
Projection
Comments

 OVERALL RESULTS

 Final Score  UA 71-70  
 Tempo (# poss)
 62 

 FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES

 eFG%  KU 55-54%  Would be a very entertaining game, but surely not to Bill Self's liking for KU's defense.
 TO Rate (lo better)  Tie 19%
 
 O-Reb% KU 39-34%
 
 FT Rate UA 29-20%
 If KU can keep this category from going too far in Arizona's column, it could give the underdog Jayhawks a strong chance of pulling off the upset.
 Four Factors Overall
 With everything so tight, Arizona's projected advantage in FT attempts could be the difference.  
 

PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played)

 Leading Scorers

 KU - Collins, Taylor

 Opp - Budinger, Wise

 
 Highest PSAN-Comp
(game impact)

 KU - Aldrich

 Opp - Budinger

 
 Highest PSAN70-Comp
(efficiency)

 KU - Marcus Morris

 Opp - Johnson

 
 Highest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Marcus Morris, Reed

 Opp - Johnson, Fogg

 
 Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Aldrich, Markieff Morris

 Opp - Hill, Judkins

 As the line changed, Collins changed to Aldrich and Horne changed to Judkins in this pre-game projection.

 

Sports and Numbers Projection

Arizona wins 71-70

(all prediction models included)

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh