Kansas at Arizona (Tucson, AZ)| | Kansas | Arizona
| Performance Indicators
| | | | Record | 8-2
| 7-3
| | AP Rank | NR (36th most votes in AP)
| NR
| Pomeroy Rating (Updated daily) | 12 | 54
| Consensus Ranking (Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls) | 37
| 55
| Best opponents defeated this season (Ranking from Pomeroy) | vs Washington (#27) W 73-54 | vs Gonzaga (#1) W 69-64 | RPI (Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current and forecast RPI from RPIForecast .) | Current: 93 Forecast: 11 | Current: 80 Forecast: 59 | Prediction Models | | | | Vegas Oddsmakers | | Win by 2.0 Est. Projection: 71-69 | Prediction Tracker (Average of several power ratings) | | Win by 0.8 | | Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor) | Win by 1.5 | | Pomeroy (Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted) | Win 70-66 68% chance of victory | | TeamRankings.com (Use home rating for home team, road for road, use specific home advantage for home team) | | Win by 11.1 | Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted) (Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location. NEW - This takes offense and defense into account separately to reflect how consistent teams have played on each end of the court) | | Est. Projection: 70.7-70.6 50.7% chance of victory | Weighted Average of All Models Above (40% Vegas + 10% Pred Trckr + 10% SagPred + 10% Pom + 10% TmRnkgs.com +10% Last 7) | | Win by 1.5 Est. Projection: 70-69 |
PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season(PSAN-O = Offensive impact, PSAN-D = Defensive impact. For PSAN-D, lower ratings are better. PSAN70 ratings are just PSAN expressed as "per 70 possessions" to reflect efficiency. The difference between ePSAN and PSAN is that "e" is enhanced and weighs recent games more - used for Kansas only.) Kansas Impact Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN-O | ePSAN-D | ePSAN-Comp | | Cole Aldrich | 35.65 | -30.83 | 66.48 | | Sherron Collins | 14.05 | -11.14 | 25.19 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 8.13 | -15.88 | 24.01 | | Brady Morningstar | 12.81 | -9.55 | 22.36 | | Marcus Morris | 5.83 | -13.05 | 18.88 | | Markieff Morris | 3.80 | -8.42 | 12.23 | | Tyrel Reed | -0.02 | -8.81 | 8.79 | | Travis Releford* | 4.00 | -1.25 | 5.25 | | Quintrell Thomas* | 1.18 | -3.69 | 4.87 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.17 | -3.05 | 2.88 | | Chase Buford* | 2.28 | 0.52 | 1.76 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.07 | -0.28 | 0.36 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -1.09 | 0.36 | -1.45 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -1.03 | 0.86 | -1.89 | | Brennan Bechard* | -1.94 | 0.15 | -2.09 | Efficiency Ratings
| PLAYER | ePSAN70-O | ePSAN70-D | ePSAN70-Comp | | Chase Buford* | 17.77 | 4.05 | 13.72 | | Cole Aldrich | 5.24 | -4.53 | 9.78 | | Marcus Morris | 1.17 | -2.62 | 3.79 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 1.13 | -2.22 | 3.35 | | Brady Morningstar | 1.89 | -1.41 | 3.30 | | Travis Releford* | 2.40 | -0.75 | 3.15 | | Sherron Collins | 1.64 | -1.30 | 2.95 | | Markieff Morris | 0.88 | -1.96 | 2.84 | | Quintrell Thomas* | 0.58 | -1.82 | 2.40 | | Conner Teahan* | -0.12 | -2.10 | 1.98 | | Tyrel Reed | 0.00 | -1.56 | 1.56 | | Matt Kleinmann* | 0.14 | -0.53 | 0.67 | | Tyrone Appleton* | -1.92 | 1.59 | -3.51 | | Brennan Bechard* | -10.67 | 0.80 | -11.47 | | Jordan Juenemann* | -10.20 | 3.37 | -13.56 | * Rating not based on enough data. | Arizona
Impact Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN-O | PSAN-D | PSAN-Comp | | Jordan Hill | 28.14 | -26.64 | 54.78 | | Chase Budinger | 27.37 | -10.60 | 37.97 | | Zane Johnson | 12.84 | 0.28 | 12.56 | | Kyle Fogg | 12.21 | 2.60 | 9.61 | | Brendon Lavender* | 2.58 | -0.72 | 3.31 | | Nic Wise | 0.20 | -1.01 | 1.21 | | Jamelle Horne | -1.38 | -1.43 | 0.04 | | D.J. Shumpert* | -1.26 | -0.98 | -0.28 | | David Bagga* | -0.81 | -0.33 | -0.48 | | Alex Jacobson* | -0.23 | 0.72 | -0.95 | | Fendi Onobun | -4.32 | 1.48 | -5.80 | | Garland Judkins | -8.63 | 5.34 | -13.97 | Efficiency Ratings | PLAYER | PSAN70-O | PSAN70-D | PSAN70-Comp | | Jordan Hill | 4.06 | -3.84 | 7.90 | | Zane Johnson | 5.64 | 0.12 | 5.52 | | Chase Budinger | 3.65 | -1.41 | 5.06 | | Brendon Lavender* | 3.14 | -0.88 | 4.02 | | Kyle Fogg | 3.37 | 0.72 | 2.65 | | Nic Wise | 0.03 | -0.14 | 0.17 | | Jamelle Horne | -0.21 | -0.22 | 0.01 | | Alex Jacobson* | -0.17 | 0.53 | -0.70 | | D.J. Shumpert* | -7.46 | -5.81 | -1.65 | | Fendi Onobun | -1.81 | 0.62 | -2.43 | | Garland Judkins | -2.69 | 1.67 | -4.36 | | David Bagga* | -7.67 | -3.10 | -4.57 | * Rating not based on enough data. |
Player Analysis:
(largely in context of ratings above) Kansas faces one of its toughest tests of the season, particularly in the form of Arizona's frontcourt duo of Jordan Hill and Chase Budinger. In last season's loss at Allen Fieldhouse, Budinger did more than any player on the court for either team with 27 PTS, 6 REB and 2 STL on 56.5 eFG% but also 5 TO's. Hill happened to have one of his worst games of the season that night, something Jayhawk fans should not expect to be the case this time around. The junior, Hill, is averaging an astounding 18.5 PTS/gm and nearly 12 REB/gm. Keep in mind that Arizona's adjusted tempo rating is #300 in the nation, so he is averaging even more if you adjust for that. Hill is shooting just under 60 eFG%, while Budinger is shooting a red-hot 64 eFG% (unbelievably 58% from 3FG). As good as Hill and Budinger have been, there isn't all that much balance on this Arizona team, with only Zane Johnson and Kyle Fogg contributing much else positively. Neither of those two plays more than 18 MIN/gm. Both are shooting a high percentage from the field, with Johnson shooting 8-of-16 from behind the arc. He doesn't play many minutes, but Kyle Fogg is rated #1 in the country in "Individual Offensive Rating" using Dean Oliver's formula (according to KenPom.com). Since he does not use that many of the team's possessions, it doesn't turn out to mean much in terms of Fogg's overall impact, but I thought it worthy to mention. Somewhat unusual for a major conference team that has a winning record is that two players are rated at a significantly negative efficiency rating despite playing 12+ minutes each. Fendi Onobun and Garland Judkins have hurt the team more than any other player statistically speaking. Both are shooting in the neighborhood of 40 eFG%. Since Arizona has a great offense but very mediocre defense, none of the players get a very good defensive rating. And these two struggle so much on offense that they get none of the credit for UA's offensive prowess. On KU's side, it continues to be a team led by Cole Aldrich in terms of production. But the MVP continues to be Sherron Collins. This game presents the Kansas freshmen with their first road test, and it could mean a significant departure (negatively) from their averages. Last 7 Game Analysis | | Kansas | Arizona | | Expected Score | 70.59 | 70.74 | | Win | 49.3% | 50.7% | | Win by 3 or less | 9.2% | 9.2% | | Win by 10 or more | 21.6% | 22.4% | Down to the Wire?
Margin of game was less than 1 point in 6.0% of simulated games from "Last 7 Game Analysis." Many of these would be "overtime" games. (Methodology of Last 7 Game Analysis: Here, we look at the last seven venue-appropriate games to see how the teams are performing. If the game takes place on the road for Kansas, for example, the analysis looks at the five most recent non-home games for Kansas. In addition, the two most recent games, regardless of venue, are added. That way, we get a picture of the how the team is performing of late. This season, the analysis also splits offense and defense. Teams often are more or less consistent on one side of the court than the other. This analysis will reflect that. Based on the strength of the opposing offense and defense they've played over the last seven games, each team's offense and defense is evaluated based on strength and consistency. Those numbers are then plugged into a simulation of 5,000 games. The results are what you see below.) Opponent Four Factor Analysis
Based on the cumulative season boxscore for the opponent, we can look at the Four Factors to see where the team has derived the bulk of its (dis)advantage in terms of scoring margin versus its opponents to date. Here is the breakdown for KU's opponent this game: | | Arizona | Opp | Advantage | | | eFG% | 55.75% | 47.72% | 88.4 | | | TO Rate | 20.19% | 17.67% | -17.1 | | | OREB% | 34.78% | 33.43% | 4.4 | | | FT Rate | 25.66% | 15.24% | 0.7 | FT Pct | | | | | 48.3 | FT Attempts | ANALYSIS: The only area the Wildcats have struggled is in turnovers. Otherwise, they're shooting it well from the field and attempting many more FT's than their opponents. They don't get to the line an unusually high amount. It's just that they are one of the absolute best at limiting opponents from getting there. Although the rebounding has been tight on average, Arizona has been more consistent on the offensive rebounding side than on the defensive side. Highlighted Efficiency Rankings Note: There are 344 Div-I teams (Source: KenPom.com) | Kansas | Arizona
| Offense #28 - Defense #17 - Tempo #185 Strong defensive eFG% (#32), particularly 2FG% defense (#9) but also 3FG% defense (#50) Excellent offensive rebounding (#15) and limiting opp OREB% (#48) Great job on defense of BLK (#24) and STL (#46) Very few 3FGA as % of FGA (#264) Allow opp high % of FG's assisted (#256)
Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: C Short: None Other Factors: Team is #332 in experience Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)
Sherron Collins - #192 AST rate Cole Aldrich - #42 OREB%, #42 DREB%, #36 BLK% Marcus Morris - #36 OREB% Markieff Morris - #171 BLK%
| Offense #13 - Defense #160 - Tempo #300 Great shooting (#14 eFG%, #2 in 3FG%) Don't force turnovers (#322) Excellent at limiting opp use of FT line (#6 opp FT Rate) Block well on defense (#47) but rarely STL (#265) Remarkably low % of FG attempts are 3FG's (#332) but opposite is true for opponents (#313 lowest %) Size (Tall = Position is Top 50 in minutes-weighted height, Short = #250 or worse) Tall: SF Short: PG Individual Player Highlights: (thru Dec 14)
Chase Budinger - #44 eFG% Nic Wise - #159 AST rate Jordan Hill - #127 eFG%, #9 OREB%, #25 DREB%, #30 BLK%
| Scoring Distribution: On offense, KU relies less than average on 3FG's, while its opponents get an extremely low percentage of points from 2FG's. On offense, UA gets an above average percentage of points from 2FG's, while its opponents rely heavily on 3FG's and hardly at all on FT's. |
Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) | ** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category | | Clear Advantage for Kansas | No Clear Advantage | Clear Advantage for Arizona | | Kansas FT% | | | | Kansas TO rate | | | | Kansas PTS/Poss** | | | | Kansas % Poss STL by Opp | | | | Kansas OREB** | | | | Arizona % Poss STL by Opp** | | | | Kansas 2pt FG%** | | | | | Arizona % own 2FGA's blocked | | | | Kansas eFG% | | | | Arizona 2pt FG% | | | | Arizona TO rate | | | | Arizona OREB | | | | Kansas 3pt FG% | | | | Arizona PTS/Poss | | | | Arizona eFG% | | | | Arizona FT Rate | | | | Arizona FT% | | | | | Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked** | | | | Kansas FT Rate** | | | | Arizona 3pt FG%** | ************************************************************* | Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Arizona will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt | | Arizona will have above avg % of FG's assisted | | Expect slow-paced game | |
Game Projections(Not a prediction. Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.) Manual adjustments: Minutes played for Arizona's Budinger and Wise (to avoid playing over 40 minutes as dictated by system automatically increasing better players' minutes in tighter games).
Projected Boxscore | Kansas | 70 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arizona | 71 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Kansas | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Brady Morningstar | 31 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Cole Aldrich | 31 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | | Conner Teahan | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Marcus Morris | 13 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Markieff Morris | 12 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | | Quintrell Thomas | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Sherron Collins | 38 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Travis Releford | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Tyrel Reed | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | | Tyshawn Taylor | 32 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 19 | 36 | 7 | 18 | 11 | 15 | 70 | 11 | 21 | 32 | 18 | 12 | 7 | 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arizona | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PLAYER | MIN | 2FGM | 2FGA | 3FGM | 3FGA | FTM | FTA | PTS | OREB | DREB | TREB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | | Chase Budinger | 40 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | Fendi Onobun | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Garland Judkins | 14 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | | Jamelle Horne | 36 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Jordan Hill | 39 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | Kyle Fogg | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | Nic Wise | 40 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | | Zane Johnson | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | | TOTALS | 200 | 16 | 37 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 71 | 11 | 17 | 28 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 3 | Projection Summary | | Projection | Comments | OVERALL RESULTS | | Final Score | UA 71-70 | | Tempo (# poss)
| 62 | | FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES
| | eFG% | KU 55-54% | Would be a very entertaining game, but surely not to Bill Self's liking for KU's defense. | | TO Rate (lo better) | Tie 19%
| | | O-Reb% | KU 39-34%
| | | FT Rate | UA 29-20%
| If KU can keep this category from going too far in Arizona's column, it could give the underdog Jayhawks a strong chance of pulling off the upset. | Four Factors Overall
| With everything so tight, Arizona's projected advantage in FT attempts could be the difference. |
| PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played) | | Leading Scorers | KU - Collins, Taylor Opp - Budinger, Wise | | Highest PSAN-Comp (game impact)
| KU - Aldrich Opp - Budinger | | Highest PSAN70-Comp (efficiency)
| KU - Marcus Morris Opp - Johnson | | | Highest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Marcus Morris, Reed Opp - Johnson, Fogg | | | Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date | KU - Aldrich, Markieff Morris Opp - Hill, Judkins | As the line changed, Collins changed to Aldrich and Horne changed to Judkins in this pre-game projection. |
Sports and Numbers ProjectionArizona wins 71-70(all prediction models included) | |