Sports and Numbers

 
Preview: Kansas at Texas A&M Print E-mail
Mar 8, 2008

Kansas at Texas A&M (College Station, TX)

 KansasTexas A&M

Performance Indicators

  
Record27-3
(Road: 7-3)
22-8
(Home: 16-3)
AP Rank5
NR
(38th most votes)
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
1
18
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
6
34
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)

vs Kansas State (#13) W 88-74
vs Arizona (#21) W 76-72 (OT)

vs Texas (#10) W 80-63
vs Ohio State (#30) W 70-47
RPI
(Used for schedule strength, not team strength. Current from Pomeroy , end-of-season forecast from RPIForecast .)

Current: 9

Forecast: 7

Current: 43

Forecast: 43

Prediction Models

  
Vegas OddsmakersWin by 5
Est. Projection: 71-65
 
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
Win by 4.1
 
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor)Win by 5.2 
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)

Win 70-63
76% chance of victory

 
Last 7 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 5 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 2 other most recent games regardless of location.)
Win by 3.8
63.7% chance of victory
 
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(30% Vegas + 20% Prediction Tracker + 15% Sagarin + 15% Pomeroy + 20% Last 7)

Win by 4.8
Est. Projection: 70-65

 

 

 

Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
Note: There are 341 Div-I teams
(Source: KenPom.com)

Kansas

Texas A&M

Offense #1 - Defense #1 - Tempo #81
Excellent shooting (#5 eFG%, #6 on 2FG% and #25 on 3FG%) and strong shooting eFG% defense (#14)
Rank #11 in STL pct and #41 in avoiding own TO
Strong offensive rebounding (#21) and limit opp OREB% (#17)
Limit opp 2FG% extremely well (#4)
Dominate the BLK category (#6 limit own, #4 block opp)
Very low % of FGA's are 3FGA (#289) while opps very high (#255 lowest)
Very high % of FG's assisted (#43)

 

Individual Player Highlights: (thru Mar 6)

Mario Chalmers - #36 eFG%, #179 AST rate, #25 STL%
Russell Robinson - #82 FT Rate, #49 STL%
Darrell Arthur - #73 OREB%, #95 BLK%
Darnell Jackson - #17 eFG%, #140 DREB%
Sasha Kaun - #152 OREB%, #36 BLK%

Offense #39 - Defense #10 - Tempo #260
Excellent eFG% defense (#12), particularly 2FG% defense (#5)
Although avoid own TO's (#48), rarely force opp TO's (#322)
Excellent at limiting opp OREB% (#11)
Keep opp off FT line (#19 FT Rate defense)
Terrible FT% (#314)
Rarely get ball stolen (#18) but rarely STL it back (#324)
Not many 3FGA's from either team (#282 % of FGA's that are 3FGA, #65 limit opp)
Limit opp % of FG's assisted (#30)

 

Individual Player Highlights: (thru Mar 6)

Josh Carter - #7 TO Rate
Joseph Jones - #200 OREB%, #117 TO Rate
Bryan Davis - #191 BLK%
DeAndre Jordan - #160 OREB%, #68 DREB%, #102 BLK%

Scoring Distribution:

On offense, KU relies most heavily on 2FG's, while its opponents rely most heavily on 3FG's.
On offense, TAM relies much more on 2FG's at the expense of 3FG's, while its opponents rely much less than usual on FT's.

 

Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

(Note: These are based on raw statistics that are unadjusted for strength of opposition.) 

 

** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category
Clear Advantage for Kansas No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Texas A&M
Kansas TO rate**    
Texas A&M FT%    
Kansas % Poss STL by Opp    
Texas A&M % own 2FGA's blocked**    
Kansas 3pt FG%**    
  Texas A&M OREB  
  Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Texas A&M eFG%  
  Texas A&M 3pt FG%  
  Texas A&M FT Rate  
  Texas A&M 2pt FG%  
  Texas A&M PTS/Poss  
  Kansas PTS/Poss  
  Kansas eFG%  
  Texas A&M % Poss STL by Opp  
  Kansas 2pt FG%  
  Kansas OREB  
  Texas A&M TO rate  
  Kansas FT%  
    Kansas FT Rate**

 

************************************************************* 

Kansas will take below avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Texas A&M will have below avg % of FG's assisted
Kansas plays faster tempo than Texas A&M

 

 

 

Game Projections

(Not a prediction.  Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.)

No manual adjustments to projections were made for this game

 

Projected Boxscore

 

Kansas 72                            
Texas A&M 65                            
                               
Kansas                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Brandon Rush 31 2 6 2 5 1 2 11 1 4 5 2 1 1 1
Cole Aldrich 6 1 2 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 3 0 0 0 1
Darnell Jackson 28 4 7 0 0 2 2 10 2 5 7 1 1 1 1
Darrell Arthur 26 4 10 0 1 2 3 10 3 4 7 1 1 0 2
Mario Chalmers 32 2 4 2 4 2 2 12 0 3 3 4 2 2 1
Rodrick Stewart 9 1 2 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 0
Russell Robinson 30 1 2 1 3 2 3 7 1 2 3 3 2 2 0
Sasha Kaun 13 2 4 0 0 1 3 5 2 2 4 0 1 0 1
Sherron Collins 25 2 4 2 4 1 1 11 0 2 2 2 2 1 0
TOTALS 200 19 41 7 18 13 18 72 11 25 36 14 11 7 7
                               
Texas A&M                              
PLAYER MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Josh Carter 33 2 4 3 7 2 3 15 1 3 4 1 1 1 0
Joseph Jones 28 3 7 0 1 3 5 9 3 3 6 1 2 1 0
Donald Sloan 34 2 5 1 3 2 3 9 1 3 4 3 3 1 0
DeAndre Jordan 25 3 6 0 0 2 4 8 2 5 7 1 2 0 1
Bryan Davis 25 3 6 0 0 2 4 8 2 3 5 1 2 1 1
Dominique Kirk 35 1 3 1 4 2 2 7 1 3 4 3 2 1 1
Derrick Roland 14 1 3 1 3 1 2 6 0 2 2 1 1 0 0
Chinemelu Elonu 6 1 2 0 0 1 1 3 1 2 3 0 1 0 0
TOTALS 200 16 36 6 18 15 24 65 11 24 35 11 14 5 3

 

 

Projection Summary

 

 
Projection
Comments

 OVERALL RESULTS

 Final Score  KU 72-65  
 Tempo (# poss)
 67 

 FOUR FACTORS ADVANTAGES

 eFG%  KU 50-46%  Given TAM's impressive eFG% defense, KU's shooting percentage could fall short.
 TO Rate (lo better)  KU 21-16%  
 O-Reb% Tie at 31%
 Winner of this battle could be the victor. 
 FT Rate TAM 28-22% 
 Four Factors Overall
 KU's modest edge in eFG% and OREB% won't be offset by a similar edge in FT attempts, since TAM struggles at the line.  
 

PLAYER PROJECTIONS (10+ min played)

 Leading Scorers

 KU - Chalmers, Collins/Rush

 Opp - Carter, Jones/Sloan

 
 Highest cPSAN
(game impact)

 KU - Chalmers

 Opp - Carter

 
 Highest cPSAN70
(efficiency)

 KU - Jackson

 Opp - Carter

 
 Highest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Collins, Jackson

 Opp - Carter, Sloan

 None of the TAM players are projected to be much over their averages.
 Lowest efficiency vs season-to-date

 KU - Arthur, Rush

 Opp - Jones, Kirk

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sports and Numbers Projection

Kansas wins 72-65

(not all prediction models included)

 

 

Pre-Game Keys to Watch For

Keys to Watch For

Metric

Result

Edge (Comments)

 The only one of the four factors that is significantly correlated mutually for offense and defense for each team is eFG%.  Simply put, this game could well be decided by which team just shoots a better eFG%.  Shot selection and easy opportunities (fast breaks) would help.  Either team to have a 5% edge in eFG%   
 A peculiar stat: TAM's offense is highly correlated to its opponents' offensive rebounding percentage.  In ten road games, KU has had OREB% of at least 35% eight times.  Of the two games it didn't, it still had a higher OREB% than the opponent in one of them.  This may not bode well for TAM's offensive efficiency.  TAM to limit KU OREB% to 32% or lower   
 Sherron Collins has re-emerged as a powerful weapon for the Jayhawks.  When he is active on offense and limits his turnovers, things seem to go KU's way.  Collins to play at least 25 MIN, shoot at least 55 eFG% and have no more than 2 TO.
  
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh