Sports and Numbers

Newsletter

 

Bulletin

See updated cumulative player ratings and MVP analysis on the Dashboard page.  You can navigate there using NCAA Basketball --> Kansas Basketball --> Special Analyses.
 
Preview: Arizona at Kansas Print E-mail
Nov 24, 2007

Arizona at Kansas (Lawrence, KS)

 KansasArizona

Talent Indicators

  
Record4-0
3-1
AP Rank4
NR
Pomeroy Rating
(Updated daily)
18
158
Consensus Ranking
(Updated periodically - avg several computer ratings and polls)
5
45
RPI
(Used for schedule strength, not team strength)
148160
Best opponents defeated this season
(Ranking from Pomeroy)
vs Louisiana-Monroe (#156) W 107-78
vs Northern Arizona (#255) W 87-46
vs Northern Arizona (#255) W 76-69
vs UMKC (#290) W 81-62

Predictions
This section gives you a flavor of what different prediction techniques indicate for this game.

  
Vegas OddsmakersWin by 13.5
Est. Projection: 86-72
 
Prediction Tracker
(Average of several power ratings)
Win by 14.7
(Not enough data for good accuracy)
 
Sagarin Power Ratings (Predictor)Win by 12.5
(Not enough data for good accuracy)
 
Pomeroy
(Efficiency and Tempo-Adjusted)
Win 89-62
(Not enough data for good accuracy)
 
Last 10 Games (Venue Adjusted)
(Uses team performance and consistency over last 7 home/non-home games, whichever pertains to this game + 3 other most recent games regardless of location.  If 7 venue-appropriate games not available, fewer than 10 total games are used.)
Win by 21.7
95.4% chance of victory
(Not enough data for good accuracy)
 
Weighted Average of All Models Above
(30% Vegas + 20% Prediction Tracker + 15% Sagarin + 15% Pomeroy + 20% Last 10)

Win by 17.3
Est. Projection: 86-69
(Not enough data for good accuracy)

 

 

PSAN-Related Player Ratings - Cumulative This Season


Note: ePSAN70 weighs recent games more, but cPSAN70 weighs all games equally

Kansas

ePSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
ePSAN ("Total Impact")

 

PLAYER ePSAN70 ePSAN
Conner Teahan* 17.27 6.19
Brennan Bechard* 11.69 2.10
Tyrel Reed 7.50 10.62
Darnell Jackson 7.11 14.40
Brandon Rush 5.57 3.99
Rodrick Stewart 5.47 10.20
Mario Chalmers 5.05 14.05
Sherron Collins (OUT)
4.24 6.09
Darrell Arthur 3.68 9.63
Sasha Kaun 3.54 6.79
Cole Aldrich 3.30 3.82
Russell Robinson 2.21 6.36
Matt Kleinmann* 2.04 0.57
Jeremy Case* -6.06 -4.53
Brad Witherspoon* -14.74 -2.28
Chase Buford* -18.16 -3.26

 

 

* Rating not based on enough data.

Arizona

cPSAN70 ("Efficiency" - per 70 possessions)
cPSAN ("Total Impact")

  

PLAYER cPSAN70 cPSAN
Jordan Hill 4.38 10.14
Bret Brielmaier 3.44 4.60
Daniel Dillon 3.43 8.77
Chase Budinger 3.30 9.99
Jamelle Horne 3.15 4.20
Jerryd Bayless 1.27 4.16
Laval Lucas-Perry 0.70 0.65
Nic Wise 0.62 0.67
Jawann McClellan 0.04 0.14
Kirk Walters* 0.00 0.00
Mohamed Tangara* -47.67 -1.14

 

* Rating not based on enough data.


Player Analysis:
(largely based on ratings above)

Sophomore 6-9 F Jordan Hill leads the ratings for the Wildcats with the highest efficiency and total impact thus far this season.  He doesn't get all the attention that Jerryd Bayless gets, but he plays much more efficiently.  Hill has shot 78 percent from the field in his first four games, while averaging 13 PTS, 4.5 REB, 1 BLK in only 24 MIN/gm.  If Arizona were performing better as a team, Hill's overall ratings would be much more in line with KU's top players.

 

The other two major contributors with good efficiency have been Daniel Dillon and Chase Budinger.  Dillon's 3FG shooting makes his overall eFG% an impressive 57.5%, while he averages 2.3 STL.  Budinger is the second-leading scorer and does a bit of everything, shooting 53.1 eFG% with 16.5 PTS, 5 REB, 5 AST (2.4:1 AST:TO), and 16-of-16 from the FT line.  (KU's next free throw coach?)

 

Jerryd Bayless gets a ton of attention as the leading scorer (18 PTS) on 54.5 eFG%, and as set-up man (6 AST) in over 34 MIN/gm.  The problem is that Arizona does a terrible job of rebounding their missed shots.  That makes a missed shot a much bigger penalty than for other teams.  Bayless has a ton of missed shots, even though he is shooting at a decent average.  Thus, the net overall contribution of his field-goal shooting (2FG and 3FG) are just under zero.  Once you factor that in, his AST and DREB are what drive his rating.  And with Arizona's lackluster team performance, all that playing time doesn't reflect well on Bayless.

 

The Kansas attack is somewhat more balanced.  The top two contributors are Jackson and Chalmers, with Jackson having the much more effiicient season thus far.  The freshman Reed is having an outstanding start to his career, while Rodrick Stewart is enjoying a rebirth in his senior year.  Everyone's waiting for consistently strong efforts like the one Darrell Arthur displayed against Northern Arizona.  Watch for his ratings to climb as he gets settled in, but for now, he still needs to keep his shooting percentages up.  Sasha Kaun and Cole Aldrich are not counted on for much scoring output, but if they can grab rebounds, block shots, and make the shots from good setup passes, they will be fine.  Russell Robinson is off to a disappointing start, and now we learn he has tendinitis.  If this is a nagging injury, it could be a major drag on his contribution levels.  Fortunately, he's not an offensive go-to guy.  His perimeter shooting has always been suspect, so if he can exercise a bit more discipline, taking only the open shot, he could improve his efficiency.  Finally, Brandon Rush continues his recovery efforts.  He should play about 20 minutes against Arizona.  There's no telling how well he'll play given the understandable level of rustiness he feels. 

 

Highlighted Efficiency Rankings
Note: There are 341 Div-I teams
(Source: KenPom.com)

Kansas

Arizona

  • Offense #14 - Defense #44 - Tempo #143
  • Nation's 2nd best eFG%, including #19 3FG%, #2 2FG%
  • Dominate the TO category (#25 limit own, #13 forced)
  • Good at limiting opp OREB% (#49)
  • Poor use of FT line (#249 FT rate) but limit opp well (#33)
  • Terrible FT% (#312)
  • Own the BLK category (#7 limit own, #11 block opp)
  • Rank #2 in STL rate
  • Very high % of FG's assisted (#9)

Individual Player Highlights: (not yet listed)

  • Offense #66 - Defense #268 - Tempo #272
  • Great eFG% (#46) with good averages from 2FG and 3FG
  • Although they don't TO much (#42), they don't force either (#252)
  • Terrible OREB% (#271), not much better at preventing opp OREB (#189)
  • Dominate the FT line (#10 FT rate, #54 allowed)
  • Give up too high 3FG% (#274)
  • Excellent FT% (#39), but opponents also shoot well (#341, maybe fluke)
  • Rarely get blocked (#22)
  • Very high % of FG's assisted (#7)

Individual Player Highlights: (not yet listed)

Scoring Distribution:
  • On offense, KU relies more on 3FG's but not so much on FT's, while its opponents rely most heavily on 3FG's.
  • On offense, UA relies more on FT's but not so much on 2FG's, while its opponents rely much more on 3FG's at the expense of 2FG's.

 

Statistical Strengths and Weaknesses Analysis

 

** Denotes that team with advantage also ranks in Top 50 in that category
Clear Advantage for Kansas No Clear Advantage Clear Advantage for Arizona
Kansas 3pt FG%**    
Kansas TO rate**    
Arizona OREB    
Kansas PTS/Poss**    
Kansas eFG%**    
Kansas 2pt FG%**    
  Kansas OREB  
  Kansas % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Arizona % Poss STL by Opp  
  Kansas % Poss STL by Opp  
  Arizona TO rate  
  Kansas FT%  
  Arizona PTS/Poss  
  Arizona % own 2FGA's blocked  
  Arizona FT Rate  
  Arizona 2pt FG%  
  Arizona 3pt FG%  
    Arizona eFG%**
    Kansas FT Rate
    Arizona FT%**

 

 

Kansas will take above avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Kansas will have above avg % of FG's assisted
Arizona will take above avg % of its FG's from 3-pt
Arizona will have above avg % of FG's assisted
Kansas plays faster tempo than Arizona

 

Game Projections

(Not a prediction.  Read more details in "FAQ & Terms" section.)


 

Projected Boxscore

(Not enough game data for accuracy)

 

Kansas 86                            
Arizona 69                            
                               
Kansas                              
NAME MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Brandon Rush 15 1 2 2 4 0 1 8 1 2 3 2 1 1 1
Cole Aldrich 12 1 3 0 0 1 2 3 2 2 4 0 0 0 0
Darnell Jackson 22 4 7 0 1 3 3 11 4 3 7 0 1 1 1
Darrell Arthur 28 5 10 0 1 3 4 13 2 5 7 1 1 2 1
Jeremy Case 8 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Mario Chalmers 29 2 4 3 5 2 2 15 0 3 3 5 1 2 0
Rodrick Stewart 20 2 3 1 2 1 2 8 2 1 3 4 2 1 0
Russell Robinson 31 1 2 2 6 2 3 10 1 3 4 5 2 1 0
Sasha Kaun 20 3 4 0 0 2 5 8 3 2 5 0 1 0 1
Tyrel Reed 15 1 1 2 3 0 0 8 0 1 1 2 0 1 0
TOTALS 200 21 37 10 24 14 22 86 15 22 37 20 10 9 4
                               
Arizona                              
NAME MIN 2FGM 2FGA 3FGM 3FGA FTM FTA PTS OREB DREB TREB AST TO STL BLK
Jerryd Bayless 33 2 5 2 6 4 6 14 1 5 6 5 5 1 0
Chase Budinger 31 3 7 2 5 3 3 15 1 4 5 4 2 0 0
Jordan Hill 23 4 6 0 0 2 2 10 3 2 5 0 2 0 1
Jawann McClellan 32 3 6 0 2 2 3 8 0 4 4 3 3 1 1
Daniel Dillon 26 1 2 1 3 1 1 6 1 1 2 2 1 2 0
Jamelle Horne 18 2 4 0 1 1 1 5 2 3 5 0 0 1 1
Laval Lucas-Perry 13 1 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 2 1 0 0 0
Nic Wise 11 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 0
Bret Brielmaier 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 0
TOTALS 200 17 32 7 20 14 18 69 10 23 33 16 15 6 3

 

 

 

Projected Four Factor Performance

 

  • eFG% - Advantage KU 59-53%.
  • TURNOVERS - Advantage KU 23-15%
  • OFFENSIVE REBOUNDING - Advantage KU 39-31%
  • FREETHROW RATE (FTM/FGA) - Advantage UA 27-23%
  • OVERALL - Shooting and turnovers will provide the necessary boost for a fairly comfortable KU victory.

 

Kansas Players Projection

 

  • Highest Game Impact (cPSAN): Mario Chalmers
  • Highest Efficiency (cPSAN70): Tyrel Reed
  • Most likely to play more efficiently than season-to-date (projected cPSAN70 - season cPSAN70): Tyrel Reed, Mario Chalmers
  • Most likely to play less efficiently than season-to-date: Jeremy Case, Cole Aldrich

Sports and Numbers Projection: Kansas wins 86-69

 

Pre-Game Keys to Watch For

Keys to Watch For

Metric

Result

Edge (Comments)

Biggest projected scoring advantage is in eFG% (even though both teams projected to shoot well), so the most active shooters' percentages will be key for both sides.Arthur, Chalmers, Jackson to avg higher eFG% than Bayless, Budinger   
KU shouldn't turn the ball over.  Question is whether KU's vaunted steal machine can force Arizona's low-TO offense to cough it up. UA to limit TO rate to below 21%  
Arizona's best chance is to dominate the FT line.  If KU has a reasonable performance there, UA probably won't have a chance. KU to make 70% of its FT's and attempt at least 80% as many as UA FTA's.